Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jul 26th, 2014
223
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 7.32 KB | None | 0 0
  1. I think you need to educate yourself and learn that the Republican Party that represents the past AND the present has always voted in majority (90-100%) favor of anti-slavery and pro-civil rights movement laws, while the Democratic party has always voted against it (Never exceeding 40% support all the way up until the Civil Rights Act of 1964) . It was the exact party Obama represents that denied African Americans civil rights for so many years. They've implanted the idea into heads similarly as lazy as yours that it's the other way around and when approached with the truth, they turn and say "Well the parties have switched sides since then" (Based on only a few members of each party switching, not based on fundamental ideas that would only show Democrats to seem more towards Marxist values). No. Fact is that the Democratic Party used to have morals and a code that it was reasonably respected for and it lived by it and didn't always take the weaker candidate just for an easy win. Now that is all that you hear from this organized criminal establishment and in many ways it has (not single-handed) completely changed the way politics is perceived and practiced in America.
  2.  
  3. It has always been known that Hollywood and The Communist Party were affiliated until the 1950's. When we banned Communists, the party dissolved into the Democratic Party and today many passages from the Communist platform exist within the Democratic parties platform. I know you don't know this so I am not bashing, I am simply offering you a chance to learn the truth. It is not unreasonable AT ALL to assume that Obama has tried, in at least several (sometimes subtle) ways to fundamentally change the way our Constitution is acknowledged in order to enact a Commie/Socialist agenda, nearly always failing. Obamacare was pro-private market exchange and has proven to be hurting recipients of healthcare everywhere....They've wanted Canada's socialized healthcare system since they've had it, this bill was Obama's legacy but always supposed to fail....He's so adored by people like you that it will never be his fault that his bill failed...They will say it's because we need a single-payer system. By the time Obama's bill would reach full wrath, people will be desperate for ANY healthcare they can get....Nevermind that it's proven to be the worst. In the end, a whole population can die with inadequate but equal treatments that are free, but pre-Obamacare a large part of a population can receive the best healthcare there is. Survival 101: Don't tie yourself to a tree at night.
  4.  
  5. If you truly gave a shit, you would know the facts and have objectivity in mind. The fact that you deny all Republicans a fair say because they are racist....makes you just as bad, if not worse for being an obvious hypocrite. How do you view Obama as a Republican? He ran for office in 2008 on a center-right agenda, if you were not aware that is a pro-Republican agenda. He is the exact opposite. Why would someone lie about moderation and clearly display a one-sided left-wing agenda? Considering who Obama was raised and taught by, he'd be completely denying his past that he's shared with us to be anything other than a Communist. It's literally a very fundamental argument that has been around since the dawn of civilization....Do the people help themselves? or... Do the people get to be helped if they cannot or WILL not help themselves? In many tribes that exist today, each person must help themselves by letting others help them, and if you don't help yourself then you are exiled. Today's argument is that you shouldn't help yourself if you feel you can't or simply don't want to. Not wanting to = Telling the government you have anger issues when you don't to receive SSD and other life-supporting benefits. I've personally seen this work with members of my family. Communism exists today in America, and it's blatant that it's only purpose in a Free-Market society is to destroy it....These ideas cannot converge and studies have shown that there's nothing worse to a free-market in terms of innovation (A cure for AIDS would be innovative.....) than Left-Wing race-based regulations, restricting it. They said Nixon was wrong for Affirmative Action and often say his presidency marked the end of the Civil Rights Movement but Obama says he's going to do stuff for black families and children constantly. Now, when it comes down to it -- they fudge the numbers very VERY well and clearly know that they would be sued and the bill would be overturned if it were to help blacks more than it would help anyone else. When the bills only address issues rampant in black communities and are advertised as originally drafted for blacks on that premise, then it is effectively Affirmative Action. Only a half black president can gesture help towards the blacks when he knows he really can't do that and can get away with it? It's gross and insulting to MLK Jr. and the entire Civil Rights movement to be as racist as that, as a black man representing progress within society. Blacks always say that White people voted for Obama out of "white guilt". So give me a fucking talking-point break already. :p
  6.  
  7. It takes a true believer in the media to say the things you say and think the way you do. So if you believe in that, believing in one word someone random from the internet has to say makes you no less foolish. The fact that you'd acknowledge a rational, well-thought response and tried understanding it before you even begin to try and dismantle it, is beyond my expectation line for a born victim who supports the Democratic party. If you'd open up your eyes, you'd know that Obama never referred to himself as a "man" but always as a black man. It's so important to know who originally incited the racial tension, to begin with. I thought equality made it so that it didn't matter? Democrats never find it strange that a selling point on Obama's presidency was that he'd be the first African American president, by his own side nevertheless. Who made it about his race? Refer to Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Had a Dream" speech. It's of no importance if you stand by and waive at Obama as his job title is PRESIDENT and his job is to be a LEADER, while he has never been one. George Washington was unanimously chosen as President for 1 reason and 1 reason only...He was liked by the Right and the Left politicians and had a talent for bringing them together / leading them into a productive state where neither side would be fit to complain. Obama, no matter his intent, has effectively practiced and achieved the EXACT opposite result. He gets away with most of it because of your lack of knowledge. You owe it to yourself to either decide to truly care by learning yourself or not caring ever again....Without sheep like you, the world would be a much better place and the media would never have gotten to you in the first place....Read the article and its sources, know who wrote it all, and judge with careful objectivity. Believing in what you believe feels a lot better when you're okay with what someone else believes, as long as they've established their beliefs through a reasonable means that they worked hard to obtain. Worshipping easy-to-disperse talking point lingo then reciting it as if it's understood is what defended the Nazi's and the Gestapo (SS) for so long. Feeding the machine that you don't know works but are told works. Makes sense....Put your life savings into Bitcoins.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement