14 Lesta Nediam LNC2017-08-07 1545 +bocivus328

Lesta Nediam LNC2017-08-07 1545 +bocivus328
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VYGRa4q9ds&lc=z233ibc55zfcibrevacdp43bkabzsuda4sdb3s3pj35w03c010c
https://pastebin.com/P64NHMUN
__

+bocivus238 __ Here are _some_ notes. By intentionally and systematically withholding, crippling and obscuring *"sufficient proof"* for claims ("sufficient proof" is a specialised lie system term which refers to any *singular* thing that _necessarily proves_ a claim to be _true and real_ without requiring a _subjective_ assessment) a person is *forced to trust* the people who are making the claim.

Those who make claims without providing "sufficient proof" (and instead provide only their word with the appearances of proof) can be referred to as *"story tellers".*

Perhaps these story tellers are telling the truth but perhaps they are not. The audience who listens to these story tellers cannot be _certain_ and are forced to trust (something that happens passively and instantly).

Those in the audience who trust the lie system's story tellers are at risk of believing *every* claim they are told - including _absurd_ reality-based fantasies. Just so long as the claim (story, tall tale or suggestion) is "rooted in reality" and is "plausible" (to the listener) it will be believed so long as the story teller is _trusted._

And those who have lost trust in the lie system's story tellers are at risk of doubting *every* claim they are told - including all that is true and real. (A disastrous situation!)

That's the basic situation we _all_ find ourselves in (by being born _into_ the lie system). There are countless examples of claims being presented to the population without "sufficient proof" (and only the appearances of proof) and you will notice them everywhere once you know what to look for. (And stop mistaking proof's appearances for actual proof.)

When you have confirmed for yourself that this is really happening (and that it cannot be accidental) you will be able to rise above the *"planned dichotomy"* (which is an endless time-wasting drama about "real versus fake" nonsense).

Some people have picked up on the fact that _actual proof_ ("sufficient proof") for claims _are not_ being provided (especially when it could and should be) and those people - _not realising it is the lie system's *"presentation protocol"*_ - are being lured into committing the *"fallacy of the conspiracy theorist".*

Those people who have been lured into the fallacy typically respond to a lie system claim with the following sentiment: _"You should be able to prove your claim but you haven't - therefore your claim is false"._

In an "honest system" this would be a reasonable reaction because honest people always go to great trouble to prove a claim they are making _with_ "sufficient proof" where it would exist. But this is not the case in a lie system. The lie system _intentionally_ avoids providing such evidence.

(When a person's belief is formed as a result of "proof's appearances" it is termed an _"unjustified belief"_ in lie system nomenclature and when a person's belief is formed as a result of genuine "sufficient proof" it is termed a _"justified belief"_ - but these nuances are beyond the scope of this reply.)

Those people who have the reaction above haven't yet grasped that this is how the lie system routinely goes about *presenting* claims - including (and especially) *true* claims. (False claims _must_ be presented in this manner because lies _cannot_ have "sufficient proof" else they would be true claims!)

However - what's important to note is not whether a claim is true or false but that it can be doubted in the first place. _Why_ a (true) claim can be doubted is _where_ the *perceptual magic trick* takes place.

Until this is genuinely understood and that the "presentation protocol" is _deliberate_ (which is the real "conspiracy") the lie system remains _imperceptible._

When a person rejects a *true* claim they are literally rejecting reality itself. When a person rejects something that is true their mind must adjust in order to accommodate it as a truth. The person's mind must somehow "rewire" itself to _make true_ what is in reality false! (A disastrous situation!)

This is especially dangerous because the person is (unwittingly) put on a path to insanity by way of a self-induced psychosis. There is more to these notes of course but without writing a 56-page essay this will have to do!


____________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ

Lesta on Twitter
https://twitter.com/lestanediam

Lesta on Google Plus
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.