Hey I just wanted to make one last quick statement. My job is done here. Admins will rethink the rule. Matter of revising teams removed from competition is on their hands now.
I only wanted  to clear up some issues with the rule itself and dealing with it.

I myself believe that the rule itself is constructed in a way that makes it too hard to prove teams their wrongs and I was just following this path. I am sorry if I failed teams who I wanted to support and I'm sorry if I made more harm for them than good. But I was was just trying to do something for a good cause in my own eyes.

About the rule itself: I think that there will be plenty of time to discuss it before the next season begins, but I want just to ask admins not to force the rule too hard until that and just act in extreme situations. Because these teams who were removed from competition with their roster changes wouldn't make any impact. And I can understand that changing more than 50% of team can be harmful. I want to propose an idea to use two simple rules instead of one complicated or just adding examples of how this rule can be abused:
1. Do not use more than 4 recently added players (We could use something like unverified status to mark them, so leaders can see it more clearly who they can and who they cannot use)
2. Adding player from a higher tier (adding four guys from prem to open team in mid season). - similar to deafult merc rule where you should ask admin if you can add more experienced player in the roster.

Also I wanted to apologize if anyone was annoyed with me or felt insulted by me, but I really thought that this discussion to should have place, because I think it needed and still needs to have one.