API tools faq
paste
Advertisement
Guest User

nerds

a guest
Jan 27th, 2015
265
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 17.59 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. On 22/01/2015, at 23:17, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  2. > Present?
  3. 

  4. On 22/01/2015, at 23:18, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  5. > Aye but in bed
  6. 

  7. On 22/01/2015, at 23:18, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  8. > Dammit.
  9. 

  10. On 22/01/2015, at 23:18, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  11. > What are you on?
  12. 

  13. On 22/01/2015, at 23:18, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  14. > Ipad
  15. 

  16. On 22/01/2015, at 23:18, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  17. > Hm.
  18. 

  19. On 22/01/2015, at 23:18, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  20. > It can handle GEORGE but not very well
  21. 

  22. On 22/01/2015, at 23:18, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  23. > I don't need you to come to Fort George.
  24. 

  25. On 22/01/2015, at 23:18, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  26. > What do you need?
  27. 

  28. On 22/01/2015, at 23:18, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  29. > I need you to describe something and look at a picture.
  30. 

  31. On 22/01/2015, at 23:19, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  32. > On 22/01/2015, at 22:30, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  33. > > http://prntscr.com/5vt1rm
  34. > > ^ Possible AoBA fort design.
  35. > > I forgot,
  36. > 
  37. > On 22/01/2015, at 22:30, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  38. > > trenches
  39. 

  40. On 22/01/2015, at 23:20, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  41. > Looks like port royal and wallace merged together
  42. 

  43. On 22/01/2015, at 23:20, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  44. > Sort of, I looked at AoBA's current fort and I revised it by looking at Fort Wallace.
  45. > Fort Wallace was apparently a very popular fort.
  46. 

  47. On 22/01/2015, at 23:20, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  48. > Do you think that is a good layout for a fort?
  49. 

  50. On 22/01/2015, at 23:21, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  51. > Hmm,
  52. 

  53. On 22/01/2015, at 23:21, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  54. > Do you want it to look very similar, or just vaguely similar?
  55. 

  56. On 22/01/2015, at 23:21, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  57. > I just want it to be fast pace.
  58. 

  59. On 22/01/2015, at 23:22, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  60. > Well with wallace there was a small dock leading into the fort.
  61. 

  62. On 22/01/2015, at 23:22, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  63. > No water components.
  64. 

  65. On 22/01/2015, at 23:22, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  66. > And in Southgate there were a few ladders here and there
  67. 

  68. On 22/01/2015, at 23:22, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  69. > It'll be an island, but there won't be any ships.
  70. 

  71. On 22/01/2015, at 23:22, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  72. > Ladders in the mountains
  73. 

  74. On 22/01/2015, at 23:23, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  75. > Hm, why?
  76. 

  77. On 22/01/2015, at 23:23, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  78. > Other way to get into the fort other than a bridge?
  79. 

  80. On 22/01/2015, at 23:23, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  81. > Yeah
  82. 

  83. On 22/01/2015, at 23:23, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  84. > Mmkay.
  85. 

  86. On 22/01/2015, at 23:23, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  87. > That's good because I was thinking of having the bridge destroyable.
  88. 

  89. On 22/01/2015, at 23:24, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  90. > Also the water should be fordable if you want it fast paced.
  91. 

  92. On 22/01/2015, at 23:24, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  93. > ?
  94. 

  95. On 22/01/2015, at 23:24, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  96. > Like you can walk through it?
  97. 

  98. On 22/01/2015, at 23:24, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  99. > Yeah
  100. 

  101. On 22/01/2015, at 23:24, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  102. > Eh.
  103. 

  104. On 22/01/2015, at 23:24, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  105. > In Wallace when defending the river you would jump in and spaz out with a sword to kill the invaders
  106. 

  107. On 22/01/2015, at 23:25, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  108. > Plus it makes the defenders need to work harder
  109. 

  110. On 22/01/2015, at 23:26, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  111. > What should the fort be called?
  112. 

  113. On 22/01/2015, at 23:27, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  114. > It's in Canada, and from what Sean told me, there are a lot of Scottish people in Canada.
  115. 

  116. On 22/01/2015, at 23:27, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  117. > Fort Scotia
  118. 

  119. On 22/01/2015, at 23:27, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  120. > Could be around the new Scotland area
  121. 

  122. On 22/01/2015, at 23:28, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  123. > I really wish Nic would do New York.
  124. > New York is more practical than Port Royal if he wants it army based.
  125. 

  126. On 22/01/2015, at 23:28, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  127. > You know why?
  128. 

  129. On 22/01/2015, at 23:28, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  130. > How?
  131. 

  132. On 22/01/2015, at 23:28, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  133. > Fort Charles was not an army fort, nor was Fort Rupert.
  134. > Port Royal was completely run by the Royal Marines and the Royal Navy.
  135. > Little to no army was stationed there, at all.
  136. > Only British militia.
  137. 

  138. On 22/01/2015, at 23:28, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  139. > New York, everyone was there.
  140. 

  141. On 22/01/2015, at 23:28, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  142. > I remember the old one
  143. 

  144. On 22/01/2015, at 23:29, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  145. > The Royal Marines, The Royal Navy, the British Army and her regiments.
  146. 

  147. On 22/01/2015, at 23:29, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  148. > We weren't stationed there before
  149. > As you said the navy and marines were there
  150. > But the navy and marines invited us to have ship battles against foreigners
  151. > I reckon New York or Gibraltar
  152. > In the old days war was brutal
  153. > I remember a Spanish raid
  154. > With shitty muskets
  155. > But it was like a crossroads
  156. 

  157. On 22/01/2015, at 23:32, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  158. > The Spanish spawn, raider spawn, cannons and then the fort with the flag in it
  159. 

  160. On 24/01/2015, at 20:30, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  161. > When you get back we have a chance to get Killer fired
  162. 

  163. On 24/01/2015, at 20:30, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  164. > Reply as soon as possible
  165. 

  166. On 24/01/2015, at 21:29, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  167. > -Replies-
  168. 

  169. On 24/01/2015, at 21:51, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  170. > Seriously please Harry.
  171. 

  172. On 24/01/2015, at 21:53, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  173. > wut
  174. 

  175. On 24/01/2015, at 21:53, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  176. > Killer has five pending CM's right?
  177. 

  178. On 24/01/2015, at 21:54, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  179. > Let me check how many.
  180. 

  181. On 24/01/2015, at 21:54, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  182. > On 19/01/2015, at 04:19, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  183. > > So, currently, Killer has... 3 or 4 court marshals pending.
  184. > 
  185. > On 19/01/2015, at 04:19, Sethbrock35 wrote:
  186. > > Give me my punishment. I don't want to be looked at as some boy who complained to his brother who happened to be king - Juan
  187. > 
  188. > On 19/01/2015, at 04:20, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  189. > > Killer = AA + TK + TK (Again) + TK (Again x2)
  190. 

  191. On 24/01/2015, at 21:56, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  192. > Who would be court marshalling him?
  193. 

  194. On 24/01/2015, at 21:57, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  195. > ?
  196. 

  197. On 24/01/2015, at 21:57, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  198. > Who were the people that sent in the requests?
  199. 

  200. On 24/01/2015, at 21:58, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  201. > Yeah
  202. 

  203. On 24/01/2015, at 21:58, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  204. > That information cannot be disclosed to non-RMP members, just to keep things confidential and fights do not break out.
  205. 

  206. On 24/01/2015, at 21:59, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  207. > So who is going to court martial killer?
  208. 

  209. On 24/01/2015, at 21:59, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  210. > Do you want to represent the people who sent the requests?
  211. 

  212. On 24/01/2015, at 21:59, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  213. > They do not need to be.
  214. > He will stand trial in front of randomly selected judges.
  215. 

  216. On 24/01/2015, at 22:00, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  217. > The evidence will be presented and the judges will vote.
  218. 

  219. On 24/01/2015, at 22:00, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  220. > Then we just need to press the court martial.
  221. 

  222. On 24/01/2015, at 22:00, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  223. > I'll have a chat with Grimm.
  224. 

  225. On 24/01/2015, at 22:00, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  226. > Technically,
  227. > at the time,
  228. > Niclas could have only pardoned ONE.
  229. 

  230. On 24/01/2015, at 22:01, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  231. > Meaning he still has 3 left.
  232. 

  233. On 24/01/2015, at 22:01, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  234. > Niclas only pardoned him running over the Queen
  235. > So it's still 4
  236. 

  237. On 24/01/2015, at 22:01, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  238. > Do you have evidence for all the charges?
  239. 

  240. On 24/01/2015, at 22:02, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  241. > Physical evidence for ALL, no, because the army soldiers and officers aren't that bright when they do that and don't take pictures.
  242. 

  243. On 24/01/2015, at 22:02, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  244. > But we have witnesses.
  245. 

  246. On 24/01/2015, at 22:03, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  247. > Over two for all of t
  248. > them*
  249. 

  250. On 24/01/2015, at 22:03, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  251. > ?*
  252. 

  253. On 24/01/2015, at 22:06, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  254. > Over for all of them?
  255. > ??
  256. 

  257. On 24/01/2015, at 22:06, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  258. > What the fuck does that mean?
  259. 

  260. On 24/01/2015, at 22:06, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  261. > Over TWO witnesses for all of them
  262. 

  263. On 24/01/2015, at 22:06, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  264. > Is there at least TWO witnesses for all of the charges?
  265. 

  266. On 24/01/2015, at 22:06, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  267. > Ye.s
  268. 

  269. On 24/01/2015, at 22:07, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  270. > Yes.*
  271. 

  272. On 24/01/2015, at 22:07, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  273. > Good.
  274. 

  275. On 24/01/2015, at 22:07, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  276. > But, there is a complication.
  277. 

  278. On 24/01/2015, at 22:07, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  279. > ?
  280. 

  281. On 24/01/2015, at 22:07, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  282. > You guys waited WAYYYY to loo long to request any of this.
  283. > AND
  284. > the Army never took pictures.
  285. > So, you'll most likely lose.
  286. > The Marines that saw it took pictures, but the army didn't.
  287. 

  288. On 24/01/2015, at 22:07, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  289. > The Army just thinks everyone will believe their word.
  290. 

  291. On 24/01/2015, at 22:07, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  292. > May I see the pictures?
  293. 

  294. On 24/01/2015, at 22:08, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  295. > We may not get him for all of them
  296. 

  297. On 24/01/2015, at 22:08, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  298. > Actually.
  299. > No.
  300. > You have no proof except the army's word.
  301. > Other than that, you have jack shit.
  302. > Because you guys waited way too long and you didn't take pictures or videos.
  303. > So, we most likely won't even bother with Killer.
  304. 

  305. On 24/01/2015, at 22:08, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  306. > We'd bother with Juan because we have lots of evidence via Marines, but, we won't because he was already pardonded.
  307. 

  308. On 24/01/2015, at 22:10, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  309. > How many collective witnesses?
  310. 

  311. On 24/01/2015, at 22:11, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  312. > I don't even know anymore, once again, you guys took too long to do any of this.
  313. 

  314. On 24/01/2015, at 22:11, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  315. > And are they from different regiments and/or branches
  316. 

  317. On 24/01/2015, at 22:11, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  318. > Yes.
  319. 

  320. On 24/01/2015, at 22:11, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  321. > Well I didn't know about it until now did I?
  322. 

  323. On 24/01/2015, at 22:11, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  324. > I'm not saying YOU, I said you guys as a collective.
  325. 

  326. On 24/01/2015, at 22:12, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  327. > God damn why does nobody take action...
  328. 

  329. On 24/01/2015, at 22:13, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  330. > Juan.
  331. 

  332. On 24/01/2015, at 22:14, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  333. > I don't know why he complains about his job being difficult
  334. 

  335. On 24/01/2015, at 22:14, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  336. > If Killer leaves it's just moving wankers up
  337. 

  338. On 26/01/2015, at 23:26, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  339. > You there?
  340. 

  341. On 26/01/2015, at 23:26, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  342. > Yeah
  343. 

  344. On 26/01/2015, at 23:27, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  345. > When did the British Military start using "Turns" instead of "Faces"?
  346. > I >THINK< it was in the mid 19th century, but I'm not sure.
  347. 

  348. On 26/01/2015, at 23:27, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  349. > Do you know?
  350. 

  351. On 26/01/2015, at 23:27, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  352. > Not sure exactly but I know they definitely used them during the world wars.
  353. 

  354. On 26/01/2015, at 23:28, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  355. > Okay.
  356. 

  357. On 26/01/2015, at 23:28, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  358. > Is WW1 drill similar to our current drill?
  359. 

  360. On 26/01/2015, at 23:28, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  361. > Let me think....
  362. > Take out all formation drill
  363. > Apart from forming ranks incase we do parades
  364. > Shoulder arms would still be used
  365. 

  366. On 26/01/2015, at 23:29, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  367. > Slope arms should be added
  368. 

  369. On 26/01/2015, at 23:30, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  370. > Perfect.
  371. 

  372. On 26/01/2015, at 23:30, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  373. > Then I already have a drill manual.
  374. 

  375. On 26/01/2015, at 23:30, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  376. > TONNES of light infantry drill should be added
  377. > Considering everything in the army that isn't in a vehicle or doesn't have a machine gun is considered light infantry
  378. 

  379. On 26/01/2015, at 23:30, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  380. > In this era would we have tanks?
  381. 

  382. On 26/01/2015, at 23:30, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  383. > Yep.
  384. 

  385. On 26/01/2015, at 23:31, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  386. > Hmm,
  387. 

  388. On 26/01/2015, at 23:31, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  389. > Tank drill was pretty basic
  390. 

  391. On 26/01/2015, at 23:31, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  392. > I'm just writing standard infantry drill.
  393. 

  394. On 26/01/2015, at 23:31, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  395. > Okay
  396. > Bayonet drill would be the same
  397. 

  398. On 26/01/2015, at 23:31, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  399. > Firing drills would have a bit more added
  400. 

  401. On 26/01/2015, at 23:32, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  402. > Did we do "BY THE RIGHT/LEFT/CENTRE, DRESS!"
  403. > Or no?
  404. > Or was it, "Dress to the right/left/centre."
  405. 

  406. On 26/01/2015, at 23:32, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  407. > ?
  408. 

  409. On 26/01/2015, at 23:32, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  410. > Hmm.....
  411. 

  412. On 26/01/2015, at 23:32, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  413. > And column marching?
  414. 

  415. On 26/01/2015, at 23:32, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  416. > I know we do wheels.
  417. 

  418. On 26/01/2015, at 23:33, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  419. > Is this to check spacing then fix it or was this to instantly fix spacing?
  420. 

  421. On 26/01/2015, at 23:33, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  422. > To make sure the line is straight etc.
  423. 

  424. On 26/01/2015, at 23:33, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  425. > So fixing it instantly?
  426. 

  427. On 26/01/2015, at 23:33, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  428. > Mhm.
  429. > Like irl currently we say
  430. > BY THE RIGHT,
  431. 

  432. On 26/01/2015, at 23:33, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  433. > DRESS!
  434. 

  435. On 26/01/2015, at 23:33, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  436. > I think it's,
  437. 

  438. On 26/01/2015, at 23:34, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  439. > "DRESSING, RIGHT DRESS!"
  440. 

  441. On 26/01/2015, at 23:34, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  442. > that's gay
  443. > it's what americans do
  444. > i'mma use the modern 1
  445. > cuz
  446. 

  447. On 26/01/2015, at 23:34, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  448. > ya
  449. 

  450. On 26/01/2015, at 23:34, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  451. > Eh fine
  452. > Dressing right dress is used in the british army to check the spacing then fix it
  453. > Your one is to fix it instantly
  454. > So just use your one
  455. > Considering for dressing right dress we'd need an animation and all that shite
  456. 

  457. On 26/01/2015, at 23:36, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  458. > Parliaments now
  459. 

  460. On 26/01/2015, at 23:36, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  461. > 'Tis not no-
  462. 

  463. On 26/01/2015, at 23:36, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  464. > Did he move it?
  465. 

  466. On 26/01/2015, at 23:36, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  467. > Yeah
  468. 

  469. On 26/01/2015, at 23:36, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  470. > Nic just said in the off topic and fgo
  471. 

  472. On 26/01/2015, at 23:37, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  473. > Damn them.
  474. > Did I miss mutch?
  475. 

  476. On 26/01/2015, at 23:37, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  477. > much*
  478. 

  479. On 27/01/2015, at 00:38, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  480. > Damn them.
  481. 

  482. On 27/01/2015, at 00:38, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  483. > Damn them to hell!
  484. 

  485. On 27/01/2015, at 02:06, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  486. > On 27/01/2015, at 02:00, George V wrote:
  487. > > juan say's he's done some talking behind you
  488. > > and has convinced agent and his Scotsmen to stay with the old wreck
  489. > 
  490. > On 27/01/2015, at 02:00, George V wrote:
  491. > > I'd advise you look into that, yes?
  492. 

  493. On 27/01/2015, at 02:27, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  494. > Are you coming or not? I don't care about EGB anymore.
  495. > So make up your fucking mind.
  496. > If you guys want to come, fine, if you don't, then fine.
  497. 

  498. On 27/01/2015, at 02:27, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  499. > Do absolute jack shit for the rest of your time on Roblox.
  500. 

  501. On 27/01/2015, at 07:33, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  502. > Coming
  503. 

  504. On 27/01/2015, at 16:21, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  505. > Present?
  506. 

  507. On 27/01/2015, at 16:22, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  508. > I have changed my mind. Killer is a general there
  509. 

  510. On 27/01/2015, at 16:22, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  511. > I am not going if he is
  512. 

  513. On 27/01/2015, at 16:22, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  514. > I had not known that, he was a cadet,
  515. > but,
  516. > as I woke up,
  517. > he is a general staff officer.
  518. > Now,
  519. > I am debating with George,
  520. 

  521. On 27/01/2015, at 16:22, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  522. > would you care if he was only a Lieutenant to Colonel?
  523. 

  524. On 27/01/2015, at 16:22, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  525. > It's to late
  526. 

  527. On 27/01/2015, at 16:23, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  528. > (A rank between Lieutenant and Colonel)
  529. 

  530. On 27/01/2015, at 16:23, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  531. > too*
  532. 

  533. On 27/01/2015, at 16:23, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  534. > My men and I are not coming
  535. 

  536. On 27/01/2015, at 16:23, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  537. > So you're going to stick with Reprisal?
  538. 

  539. On 27/01/2015, at 16:23, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  540. > And a CAS without a backbone?
  541. 

  542. On 27/01/2015, at 16:23, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  543. > If GEORGE can be corrupted once like this, he can be again
  544. > Harry I am between a rock and a hard place
  545. 

  546. On 27/01/2015, at 16:23, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  547. > All of my decisions so far have been what is best for my brigade
  548. 

  549. On 27/01/2015, at 16:23, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  550. > As have mine for the Corps.
  551. 

  552. On 27/01/2015, at 16:23, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  553. > I can't trust GEORGE or reprisal
  554. 

  555. On 27/01/2015, at 16:24, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  556. > I can trust George over Reprisal.
  557. 

  558. On 27/01/2015, at 16:24, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  559. > I respect your decision
  560. 

  561. On 27/01/2015, at 16:24, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  562. > And I also have Jervis with me incase anything goes wrong.
  563. > What if Killer is a Captain?
  564. 

  565. On 27/01/2015, at 16:24, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  566. > Or you wouldn't care even if he was a cadet.
  567. 

  568. On 27/01/2015, at 16:24, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  569. > It has been decided
  570. 

  571. On 27/01/2015, at 16:24, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  572. > My men are not coming. Neither am I
  573. 

  574. On 27/01/2015, at 16:25, Harry(flag:GB) wrote:
  575. > Even if we kicked Killer out?
  576. 

  577. On 27/01/2015, at 16:25, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  578. > I don't think you'll convince GEORGE to do that
  579. > EGB has been always my residence on roblox
  580. > So I will remain there.
  581. > It was an honour serving with you HP.
  582. 

  583. On 27/01/2015, at 16:26, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  584. > It sincerely was indeed.
  585. 

  586. On 27/01/2015, at 21:47, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  587. > What I have done is put the whole ww1 thing down to the men
  588. > They will vote until seven pm tomorrow
  589. 

  590. On 27/01/2015, at 21:48, AgentMADMAN wrote:
  591. > If it's a yes vote I need some help in rmp because juans getting pissy
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
Public Pastes
Advertisement
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!