Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- at Oct 4 13:49:42 2014:
- Okt 04 13:49:42 * Now talking on #ubuntu
- Okt 04 13:49:42 * Topic for #ubuntu is: Official Ubuntu Support Channel | IRC Guidelines: http://ubottu.com/y/gl | IRC info: http://ubottu.com/y/irc | Pastes to http://paste.ubuntu.com/ | Release Notes: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TrustyTahr/ReleaseNotes | Download: http://ubottu.com/y/dl | Currently supported: 10.04 LTS (server), 12.04 LTS, and 14.04 LTS | Please don't respond to channel trolls
- Okt 04 13:49:42 -ChanServ- [#ubuntu] Welcome to #ubuntu! Please read the channel topic. This channel is logged. Use of this channel implies acceptance of terms at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/TermsOfService
- Okt 04 13:49:42 * #ubuntu :http://www.ubuntu.com
- Okt 04 13:49:54 <GPenguin> hello, is there a dedicated channel for ufw related questions?
- Okt 04 13:52:40 <GPenguin> !ufw
- Okt 04 13:52:41 <ubottu> Ubuntu, like any other Linux distribution, has built-in firewall capabilities. The firewall is managed using the 'ufw' command - see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UFW | GUI frontends such as gufw and ufw-kde also exist. | An alternative to ufw is the 'iptables' command - See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/IptablesHowTo
- Okt 04 13:53:51 <GPenguin> i assume the silence means it is okay to ask ufw related questions here
- Okt 04 13:54:10 <GPenguin> is it possible to mix ufw with iptables rules (e.g. from fail2ban)?
- Okt 04 13:58:50 <GPenguin> what about DNS? i see in no example how you handle DNS when you block incoming
- Okt 04 14:00:26 <somsip> GPenguin: is this essentially a ufw question of a Fail2Ban question?
- Okt 04 14:00:30 <somsip> *or
- Okt 04 14:01:57 <GPenguin> i ask if the fail2ban rules work when you use ufw
- Okt 04 14:02:11 <ikonia> GPenguin: that makes no sense
- [asshole]
- Okt 04 14:02:44 <ikonia> GPenguin: there is nothing offensive in what I said
- Okt 04 14:03:00 <GPenguin> if you fail to grasp the sense it does not mean i make no sense
- Okt 04 14:03:03 <GPenguin> now cut it off
- Okt 04 14:03:11 <ikonia> GPenguin: no, what you ask doesn't make sense
- Okt 04 14:03:12 <GPenguin> let others help who care
- Okt 04 14:03:16 <ikonia> as fail2ban depends on pattern matching logs
- Okt 04 14:03:30 <ikonia> if you are blocking access to a service it will not hit the logs so fail2ban can't pattern match
- Okt 04 14:03:44 <GPenguin> it uses iptables and i want to know if ufw interfers with other programs that use iptables direclty
- Okt 04 14:04:02 <ikonia> GPenguin: fail2ban doesn't interact with ufw - it interacts with fail2ban
- Okt 04 14:04:08 <ikonia> sorry it iptbles directly
- Okt 04 14:04:11 <ikonia> so it won't cause a problem
- Okt 04 14:04:20 <GPenguin> testing my nerves again. alright. anybody else?
- Okt 04 14:04:22 <ikonia> ufw is just "fronting" iptables
- Okt 04 14:04:36 <ikonia> so iptables is still the netfilter firewall, so it wo'nt cause a problem
- Okt 04 14:04:53 <GPenguin> why the whole drama instead of posting that last line?
- Okt 04 14:05:05 <ikonia> there is no drama
- Okt 04 14:05:08 <GPenguin> shove your ego to the door and keep it out
- Okt 04 14:05:12 * ChanServ gives channel operator status to ikonia
- Okt 04 14:05:12 * ikonia sets ban on *!*@pD9F880D0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
- Okt 04 14:05:12 * ChanServ removes channel operator status from ikonia
- Okt 04 14:05:18 * ChanServ gives channel operator status to ikonia
- Okt 04 14:05:18 * You have left channel #ubuntu (requested by ikonia (come back when you can grow up))
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
