Lesta Nediam LNC2015-12-29 2315 +Brian Hill

Lesta Nediam LNC2015-12-29 2315 +Brian Hill
https://plus.google.com/108307171107218108267/posts/LdZKitvnG4u
https://pastebin.com/NKXZRLxb
__


+Brian Hill __ It is a fair question and if anyone had asked me to provide a source (and for some reason I hadn't) _then I would not hesitate to do so._

*I would not hesitate because if it had really happened (what "Obama" had said with regard to "Michael") then I'd want the world to see it for themselves and not have to rely on my own video etc.*

I do not have a problem with RV but this is not a good look. If we are posting videos for people then we have to be willing to go a step further.

*If a source has not been given then it should be given.* It should *never* be expected that the viewer hunts down the source video.

That's lazy and sloppy and has no place in a so-called "truth community".

You have written a detailed and fair comment and received *an unsatisfactory response.* It would have been better had your message gone unanswered.

*If someone is peddling disinformation then no longer am I going to turn a blind eye.*

If it turns out that RV has NOT misrepresented the situation then - of course - _he will have been vindicated._

But for something like this it is madness to risk one's reputation just for a few views. Because that's all this amounts to - a few views. And if it turns out to be BS then it will soon be found out and that person can NEVER be trusted again.

The right thing to do is acknowledge the source.

Given that RV had recently posted a misrepresentative quote  about "Chris Hadfield" then if RV is a genuine person he is being played.

If this quote is misrepresentative and if RV is innocent (i.e., did not intend on posting disinformation) then it means there are people who are playing him for a fool because they know he is not checking sources.

On the other hand it that's not the case - if this was intentional - *then that's magnitudes worse.*

A reputation with Lesta is LOST the INSTANT a person intentionally peddles ANY kind of disinformation.

The INSTANT another person posts something that they know to be untrue they have permanently TRASHED their name with me.

They will need to start up a new account with a completely different name just to wipe the slate clean with me (and I'd better not find out who they previously were).

If a person has posted disinformation *but it was unintentional* then they have also damaged their reputation/name because they must now be considered *UNRELIABLE.*

Unreliable people are worthless to me because I know I have to go and check/confirm everything they post and that despite "good intentions" some of it could be disinformation.

Finally, being unwilling to provide a source makes a person look guilty and it is a rookie move.

However you look at this - *NOT GOOD.*


__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w