SwitchView

-admins PRE Convo

Jul 16th, 2015
132
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.43 KB | None | 0 0
  1. <•buzzie71> SwitchViewz, I think there's more cooperation between players and Sadmins if that's what c45y was trying to get at in the thread?
  2. <•buzzie71> in terms of events
  3. <•c45y> which thread is this?
  4. <•buzzie71> player-ran events
  5. <•c45y> oh gotcha
  6. <•c45y> I just don't think the demand is high enough and the existing solution works
  7. <•c45y> if we had lots of players wanting to do things and you guys were swamped I would be all for the revised proposal
  8. <•c45y> if the post is about visibilty that we are accepting requests than im happy to see progress on that
  9. <•c45y> but thats not the feeling I got sorry SwitchViewz
  10. <•c45y> SwitchViewz: I don't mean tech admins, I mean event admins, to clarify my position
  11. <•c45y> there is a lot of focused needed in the bigger events, and I think this could be distracting for what is a minor gain
  12. <•SwitchViewz> I should have clarified
  13. <•SwitchViewz> The original proposal included large events
  14. <•SwitchViewz> The new proposal includes minor events, such as spleef or a pvp tournament on P. However, if the player wanted to do a large event they could, but they would have to do it all themselves. The only thing we would provide is the tools I listed
  15. <•c45y> yeah I understand that part
  16. <•SwitchViewz> The only thing staff would do is provide those tools, we would do no building/running of the event, that would all be the player
  17. <•c45y> I meant that the process of dealing with these smaller and probably less planned events might distract yourself and any future e admins from the larger tasks
  18. <•c45y> I might just shut up
  19. <•c45y> if you think its not going to be a problem I guess you know your schedule better than I do
  20. <•SwitchViewz> No no, I welcome the concerns, that's the point of the thread
  21. <•SwitchViewz> The goal of the new proposal was to put almost no strain on eadmins. Players would go to the server admins or an eadmin just to pass it by them, another staff member could provide those features aside from easysigns.
  22. <•SwitchViewz> eadmins would not do a whole lot, besides pass it on to the server admins, as it is ultimately up to them what events are ran on there servers, unless they want to do something on E
  23. <•SwitchViewz> (If Im making sense?)
  24. <•c45y> Do you think a formal approval process won't scare people off?
  25. <•c45y> If you have the time to make the process then maybe just do so and we can see the result
  26. <•c45y> I guess im stuck on why/where we would apply this
  27. <•c45y> why do we need another step in the existing process ( which I was unaware wasn't so common on P )
  28. <•SwitchViewz> There is no approval process, that was the old proposal. The players only go to the server admins and go "We'd like to host an event and we'd like it broadcasted"
  29. <•c45y> I would love to see server messages and stuff for 'got an event idea? msg switch to help develop it'
  30. <•buzzie71> it's not really "not common" as it is "nonexistent"
  31. <•buzzie71> on P
  32. <•c45y> oh, the Idea B sounded approval-y, must have misread
  33. <•c45y> re-reading now
  34. <•c45y> buzzie71: do players just do it without you? or are they just not as opinionated as S players?
  35. <•SwitchViewz> buzzie71: Not sure what you mean? Events are done on P by players all the time. I can think of Spleef, PvP, Nightoak, etc etc
  36. <•buzzie71> events? nah they usually just set them up themselves, announce on the subreddit, and run it
  37. <•buzzie71> what I meant was that Padmins and staff don't use their mod tools to help set up or promote player-ran events
  38. <•c45y> yeah, and thats great
  39. <•buzzie71> at least that is the current status quo
  40. <•c45y> I don't want to get in the way of them dong that
  41. <•c45y> doing even
  42. <•c45y> this updated proposal sounds like we wouldn't be, which is great
  43. <•SwitchViewz> The proposal was to expand on that, give them a few more tools, such as broadcasting
  44. <•buzzie71> that's what I meant by "current process not existing on P"
  45. <•buzzie71> ahhh
  46. <•c45y> SwitchViewz: is there a bit im missing about how we are planning to communicate this?
  47. <•c45y> I think thats the link I really would like to see hashed out
  48. <•SwitchViewz> As in how we announce it to the community?
  49. <•c45y> yeah, how do we let them know we are happy to help ( its sad we have to tell them so )
  50. <•SwitchViewz> [Server] Messages, add it to the subreddit (maybe sidebar?), not sure what else, I haven't thought about that much yet, mostly been trying to gather everyones thoughts
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment