22 Lesta Nediam LNC2017-08-03 0620 +nationalparksign

Lesta Nediam LNC2017-08-03 0620 +nationalparksign
https://plus.google.com/+nationalparksign/posts/MRED3rCDWnT
https://pastebin.com/LF6eCEj3
__

+nationalparksign . __ That kind of rapid blinking is akin to a hostage sending out a secret Morse code signal!

I'd like to see just one of the supposed space mice floating about in its filth in a weightless environment. I am sure the children watching (the target audience of "NASA") would be fascinated. It would spark a whole series of *new* and *interesting* questions!

Questions such as: "How are you feeding and hydrating the mice?" "How often do you clean out the mice enclosures?" "How many mice have perished?" "What does PETA have to say about the usefulness and necessity of this research?"

Though - perhaps the reason we don't see any space mice is because children around the world instantly think a whole lot less of their "astronaut" heroes.



__________
2017-08-03 0740

+nationalparksign . __ I never saw that. My imagination went into overdrive with the suggestions embedded with that disgraceful footage. Here are some points:

1) All we saw was - _at most_ - *a 1-minute clip* which suggested the distressed *black* mouse wasn't on a zero-g flight but could have been in a "drop box".

A "drop box" is a container that's released from a _great height_ (via a high-altitude balloon or a small-scale rocket) to achieve *more than a minute of weightlessness*.

This is used for "investigations" that require longer than the 20-30 seconds of usable weightlessness from a zero-g flight.

Needless to say - the living contents of the "drop box" are not expected to survive - _but the footage and "scientific data" does_.

Remember - "Felix" managed *4 minutes and 19 seconds* of "free fall" before deploying his parachute. If he did not need to deploy a parachute (to survive!) he could have lasted longer. (Apparently he was expected to last up to six minutes anyway.)

*So - achieving a full minute of weightlessness from a "drop box" is not at all unusual.*

Furthermore - the mouse looked very unsettled and distressed. Not at all like it had already spent *many hours and days in weightlessness* and gotten accustomed to its new reality.

Perhaps we are supposed to believe the mouse was moving frantically about for the entire duration of the experiment? I wonder how it managed to sleep?

Okay - we saw a full minute - why not show us two? Why not show us the mouse while it is sleeping and not looking so distressed? Were we shown the mouse when it was least frantic?

*Or did they only show that single minute because that's _the only minute of footage_ available?*

Are we to believe that *every* mouse had its own enclosure like that? Okay - so how many mice were sent to the "ISS"? *Surely that's a lot of space required for this experiment!*

Then again - all of this *also makes sense* if there was just one mouse inside a "drop box". We have to *trust* that wasn't the case.

Furthermore - without being able to see anything else of the "ISS" we don't know *where* the mouse was or *when* it was filmed.


_*This all brings me to the next point:*_


2) The video description says this: _"All mice returned to Earth alive and breed successfully."_

That's wonderful news! *But the footage showed us a picture of a _white_ mouse at the end!*

What happened to the black one? Perhaps the black mouse turned white from fear?!

Did "NASA" send up both black and white mice?

*What we are shown is thoroughly unconvincing*. It is proof of nothing. What we see is what we'd expect to see from a "drop box" and not necessarily an experiment that's performed in a *permanent weightless environment* that goes on for days if not weeks.

_Let's see ten minutes of the distressed mouse in HD!_

If the "ISS" is real and manned - and mouse experiments are being conducted aboard - then there must surely exist more than 10 minutes of footage.

If we are permitted to see a full minute then why not ten? Why not five? Why not just two? Why *only* a single minute? Why are we only shown that which could also be achieved via a "drop box"?

Ah - but there *is* a reason. And it leads us to the only provable conspiracy which makes all of the other "conspiracies" possible.

When people *trust* the source ("NASA"/"ISS"/"JAXA") and the *story* presented is "plausible" and the *context* for it is "real/serious" - then all trusting people in the population find themselves powerless to doubt. *Even when everything suggests the claim should be doubted!*

(And those open-minded people who lose trust because they "smell a rat" - so to speak - end up committing the *"fallacy of the conspiracy theorist"* which causes them to end up losing friends, family and their reputation once they begin ranting and raving about how the Earth is flat!)




____________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ

Lesta on Twitter
https://twitter.com/lestanediam

Lesta on Google Plus
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.