#golemquest log Nov. 07

[2011-11-07 00:01:05] <Ralith> envy
[2011-11-07 00:04:21] <MrTT> hey... we need to stop using the tijuana manniquen
[2011-11-07 00:04:30] <MrTT> armas has a word of gold, he does not lie
[2011-11-07 00:04:47] <MrTT> cheesecakes are epic win. congrats wuten
[2011-11-07 00:05:11] <Wutenheimer_> w00t
[2011-11-07 00:07:47] <BUTTZ> Not does not lie, he does not break his word
[2011-11-07 00:08:04] <BUTTZ> Lying is still on the table if he needs to
[2011-11-07 00:08:09] <BUTTZ> But not word breaking
[2011-11-07 00:11:01] <Ironybot> One could argue that the sign was intended facetiously, and was thus not a lie.
[2011-11-07 00:11:42] <Ironybot> Alternately, one could argue that the sign didn't use the full explicit grammar required to do more than strongly imply its meaning.
[2011-11-07 00:13:32] <Ironybot> It occurs to me that the sign we left, and the tiny note in particular, might have been responsible for no few of the trespassers Amen received and did unspeakable unknown things to.
[2011-11-07 00:13:57] <BUTTZ> Probably. What did that note say? I can't remember it.
[2011-11-07 00:14:46] <Ironybot> One moment, I'll pull up the quote.
[2011-11-07 00:15:30] <Ironybot> "GONE TO TIJUANA FOR TEQUILA AND BITCHES, SEE YOU AT THE DONKEY SHOW " with a small note hidden on it that says "Camella, too dangerous-at Smets. "
[2011-11-07 00:15:41] <BUTTZ> Yep
[2011-11-07 00:15:47] <Ironybot> Strictly speaking, we didn't state that either of those referred to our personal location.
[2011-11-07 00:16:06] <BUTTZ> It doesn't even matter, we're perfectly OK to lie like that
[2011-11-07 00:16:55] <Ironybot> Are we? Surely it's not limited to verbal communication. Or does it only apply to our intentionally given word or sealed Bargains?
[2011-11-07 00:17:14] <BUTTZ> Given word and Bargains from what I understand.
[2011-11-07 00:17:20] <BUTTZ> That was implied anyway when we got the trait
[2011-11-07 00:23:55] <Wutenheimer_> wait, with the new rule of three thing
[2011-11-07 00:24:07] <Wutenheimer_> and how it doesnt do anything to us
[2011-11-07 00:24:30] <Wutenheimer_> does the other party still have to furfil their end of the bargain or lose... their soul or whatever?
[2011-11-07 00:26:24] <Ironybot> Quite possibly. It might very well be absurd hax.
[2011-11-07 00:27:03] <Samar> that would be awesome... how exactly did we get this again?
[2011-11-07 00:27:11] <Samar> the fanarts?
[2011-11-07 00:27:13] <Wutenheimer_> the strikes
[2011-11-07 00:27:19] <Wutenheimer_> the nevernever strikes
[2011-11-07 00:27:32] <Samar> so we officially hit 13?
[2011-11-07 00:27:35] <Ironybot> The strikes gave us the base trait, which the fanarts have apparently improved somehow.
[2011-11-07 00:28:26] <Ironybot> Hitting 13 strikes would have made us turn into some kind of crazy magic-destroying soulless monstrosity. Or something.
[2011-11-07 00:31:14] -->| Shifter55 (~Scrambled@Rizon-A8CD4895.lns17.cht.bigpond.net.au) has joined #golemquest
[2011-11-07 00:32:01] <Ironybot> It occurs to me that if Sake surrounds us with a dust cloud, we'd be surrounded with shade- meaning that Shadowbro would be able to intercept any bullets coming for us.
[2011-11-07 00:32:25] <Ironybot> Armas the apparently-invulnerable cloud man.
[2011-11-07 00:45:41] [INFO] Disconnecting from IRC.  Click close again to exit now.
[2011-11-07 00:45:41] [QUIT] Disconnected from irc://irc.rizon.net/ (irc://irc.rizon.net/). [[Reconnect][Reconnect to irc.rizon.net][reconnect]]