Advertisement
Guest User

Gödel's Second Incompleteness Theorem

a guest
Jul 29th, 2014
451
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.22 KB | None | 0 0
  1. from: http://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Math/Milnikel/boolos-godel.pdf
  2.  
  3. Gödel's Second Incompleteness Theorem
  4. Explained in Words of One Syllable
  5.  
  6. First of all, when I say "proved", what I will mean is "proved with the
  7. aid of the whole of math". Now then: two plus two is four, as you well
  8. know. And, of course, it can be proved that two plus two is four
  9. (proved, that is, with the aid of the whole of math, as I said, t hough
  10. in the case of two plus two, of course we do not need the whole of math
  11. to prove that it is four). And, as may not be quite so clear, it can be
  12. pr oved that it can be proved that two plus two is four, as well. And it
  13. can be proved that it can be proved that it can be proved that two plus
  14. two is four. And so on. In fact, if a claim can be proved, then it can
  15. be proved that the claim can be proved. And that too can be proved.
  16.  
  17. Now, two plus two is not five. And it can be proved that two plus two is
  18. not five. And it can be proved that it can be proved that two plus two
  19. is not five, and so on.
  20.  
  21. Thus: it can be proved that two plus tw o is not five. Can it be proved
  22. as well that two plus two is five? It would be a real blow to math, to
  23. say the least, if it could. If it could be proved that two plus two is
  24. five, then it could be proved that five is not five, and then there
  25. would be no claim that could not be proved, and math would be a lot of
  26. bunk.
  27.  
  28. So, we now want to ask, can it be proved that it can't be proved that
  29. two plus two is five? Here's the shock: no, it can't. Or, to hedge a
  30. bit: if it can be proved that it can't be proved that two pl us two is
  31. five, then it can be proved as well that two plus two is five, and math
  32. is a lot of bunk. In fact, if math is not a lot of bunk, then no claim
  33. of the fo rm "claim X can't be proved" can be proved.
  34.  
  35. So, if math is not a lot of bunk, then, though it can't be proved that
  36. two plus two is five, it can't be proved that it can't be proved that
  37. two plus two is five. By the way, in case you'd like to know: yes, it
  38. can be proved that if it can be proved that it can't be proved that two
  39. plus two is five, then it can be proved that two plus two is five.
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43. George Boolos, Mind, Vol. 103, January 1994, pp. 1 - 3.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement