Advertisement
Darkdrifter

Nic Surgeon Results

Jul 30th, 2014
227
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.37 KB | None | 0 0
  1. //
  2.  
  3. All optimize sims were executed with the following inputs:
  4.  
  5. Surge Mode
  6.  
  7. Deck: Nexor, sacred sanctuary, sacred sanctuary, tazerecca, arch nova elite, demi constrictor, demi constrictor, honorable samurai, ayrkrane syn, oreworks
  8.  
  9. Owned cards for climb sims include:
  10.  
  11. sculpted aegis
  12. xeno suzerain
  13. charincinerator
  14. demo aspirant
  15. global positioner
  16. trench lobber
  17.  
  18. 130k weakest
  19. 150k mid range
  20. 127k brutal
  21.  
  22. \\
  23.  
  24.  
  25. unordered optimized end deck: SS, ore, sculpted, suzerain, ANE, demi, demi, HS, syn (130k)
  26.  
  27. unordered optimized end deck: SS, SS, oreworks, sculpted, suzerain, ANE, demi, demi, HS, syn (150k)
  28.  
  29. unordered optimized end deck: SS, SS, oreworks, suzerain, ANE, demi, demi, HS, syn, crude surgeon (127k)
  30.  
  31. <--->
  32.  
  33.  
  34. unordered optimized end deck with 2x inspiring altars vs 1 FA : SS, oreworks, sculpted, ANE, demi, demi, HS, syn (130k)
  35.  
  36. unordered optimized end deck with 2x inspiring altars vs 1 FA: SS, oreworks, sculpted, ANE, demi, demi, HS, syn (150k)
  37.  
  38. unordered optimized end deck with 2x inspiring altars vs 1 FA: SS, SS, oreworks, sculpted, ANE, demi, demi, HS, syn (127k)
  39.  
  40. //\\
  41.  
  42. unordered optimized end deck with 2x inpspiring altars vs 1 FF: SS, SS, sculpted, taze, demi, demi, HS, syn, crude surgeon (130k)
  43.  
  44. unordered optimized end deck with 2x inpspiring altars vs 1 FF: SS, SS, sculpted, taze, demi, demi, HS, syn, trench lobber, crude surgeon (150k)
  45.  
  46. unordered optimized end deck with 2x inpspiring altars vs 1 FF: SS, SS, sculpted, taze, demi, demi, HS, syn, trench lobber, crude surgeon (127k)
  47.  
  48. //\\
  49.  
  50.  
  51. unordered optimized end deck with 2x mortar towers vs 1 FA: SS, SS, oreworks, sculpted, ANE, demi, demi, HS, syn (130k)
  52.  
  53. unordered optimized end deck with 2x mortar towers vs 1 FA: SS, SS, oreworks, sculpted, ANE, demi, demi, HS, syn (150k)
  54.  
  55. unordered optimized end deck with 2x mortar towers vs 1 FA: SS, SS, oreworks, sculpted, ANE, demi, demi, HS, syn (127k)
  56.  
  57. //\\
  58.  
  59. unordered optimized end deck with 2x mortar towers vs 1 FF: SS, SS, sculpted, taze, suze, demi, demi, HS, syn, crude surgeon (130k)
  60.  
  61. unordered optimized end deck with 2x mortar towers vs 1 FF: SS, SS, sculpted, taze, suze, demi, demi, HS, syn, crude surgeon (150k)
  62.  
  63. unordered optimized end deck with 2x mortar towers vs 1 FF: SS, SS, sculpted, taze, suze, demi, demi, HS, demo aspirant, syn (127k)
  64.  
  65. //\\
  66.  
  67. unordered optimized end deck with 1x mortar tower, 1x corrosive spore vs 1 FA: SS, SS, oreworks, sculpted, ANE, demi, demi, syn (130k)
  68.  
  69. unordered optimized end deck with 1x mortar tower, 1x corrosive spore vs 1 FA: SS, SS, oreworks, sculpted, ANE, demi, demi, syn (150k)
  70.  
  71. unordered optimized end deck with 1x mortar tower, 1x corrosive spore vs 1 FA: SS, SS, oreworks, sculpted, ANE, demi, demi, syn (127k)
  72.  
  73. <--->
  74.  
  75. //Comparing ordered non-GW end deck with or without crude surgeon\\
  76.  
  77. 130k
  78.  
  79. ordered surge end deck: demi, oreworks, SS, demi, ANE, syn, HS, SS, crude surgeon (130k) (75.16%)
  80.  
  81. ordered surge end deck: demi, oreworks, SS, demi, ANE, syn, HS, SS (130k) (76.1%)
  82.  
  83. 150k
  84.  
  85. ordered surge end deck: demi, oreworks, SS, demi, ANE, syn, HS, SS, crude surgeon (150k) (57.04%)
  86.  
  87. ordered surge end deck: demi, oreworks, SS, demi, syn, ANE, HS, SS (150k) (58.07%)
  88.  
  89. 127k
  90.  
  91. ordered surge end deck: demi, oreworks, SS, demi, syn, ANE, HS, SS, Crude Surgeon (127k) (45.82%)
  92.  
  93. ordered surge end deck: demi, oreworks, SS, demi, syn, ANE, HS, SS (127k) (45.96%)
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement