(17:01:35) PT_: no, I only clear it
(17:01:44) PT_: Well
(17:01:47) PT_: Yes, I use it
(17:02:40) TI-Bot: critor has been logged out (Timeout).
(17:03:33) Hamza.S: Wistaro qui fait la résistance parmi tous ces roses :p
(17:06:16) TI-Bot: Ti64CLi++ a répondu au topic Re: Bash de TI-Planet
(17:07:55) PT_: Well, this didn't solve it :|
(17:08:28) TI-Bot: maufi9205 logs into the Chat.
(17:08:43) TI-Bot: Wistaro has been logged out (Timeout).
(17:08:50) TI-Bot: critor logs into the Chat.
(17:12:15) TI-Bot: S01den has been logged out (Timeout).
(17:12:18) PT_: Ugh, it's something else I don't know
(17:12:55) TI-Bot: Frederic60150 a répondu au topic Re: redémarrage intempestif ti cx cas
(17:13:23) TI-Bot: noelnadal logs into the Chat.
(17:13:39) TI-Bot: noelnadal logs out of the Chat.
(17:15:45) PT_: EDIT: it's a bug of PHASM
(17:15:54) PT_: I think
(17:15:57) PT_: Maybe not
(17:15:58) PT_: lol
(17:17:51) TI-Bot: noelnadal logs into the Chat.
(17:17:52) noelnadal: re
(17:19:01) TheMachine02: maybe it was an odd workaround for a previous phasm bug :p
(17:19:11) TheMachine02: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=​XZp3Mtn-YsI
(17:19:12) TI-Bot: critor a répondu au topic Re: redémarrage intempestif ti cx cas
(17:19:55) PT_: Heh, it's PHASM bug
(17:20:07) PT_: But..
(17:20:09) PT_: ugh
(17:20:55) PT_: PHASM seems to fail for large programs
(17:21:34) PT_: Let's test it with Cesium
(17:21:34) TheMachine02: mmmhhh
(17:22:02) TheMachine02: strange, I used to load 64K program with phasm easily
(17:22:13) PT_: Is it then ICE specific?
(17:22:25) TheMachine02: maybe there is an uncatched exception somewhere though
(17:22:26) PT_: Let me try it out
(17:22:57) PT_: Well, the OS copies ICE to (userMem), and after running, it deletes it, but there it goes wron
(17:22:58) PT_: g
(17:23:57) TI-Bot: Frederic60150 a répondu au topic Re: redémarrage intempestif ti cx cas
(17:25:59) TheMachine02: well technically os move thing around first, copy it, and move things again, updating vat in process
(17:26:12) TI-Bot: critor a répondu au topic Re: Nouveautés OS TI-Nspire CX 4.4
(17:26:31) PT_: It is possible though, because ICE creates/deletes program, that it will be messed up
(17:27:05) TheMachine02: nah shouldn't be
(17:27:05) PT_: that is the most likely case
(17:27:07) TI-Bot: ultimate905 logs into the Chat.
(17:27:25) TheMachine02: I mean, glib does create program at run time and I haven't had any bugs so far
(17:27:41) PT_: Does it also remove programs?
(17:27:49) TheMachine02: yeah
(17:27:55) PT_: Errrr
(17:27:57) PT_: Ugh
(17:27:57) TheMachine02: at the end :p
(17:28:12) PT_: And... do you run glib as prgmGLIB or Asm(prgmGLIB)?
(17:28:18) PT_: (with PHASM installed)
(17:28:27) TheMachine02: wait, I test with latest PHASM
(17:28:34) PT_: do it without the ASM token
(17:29:03) TI-Bot: critor a répondu au topic Re: redémarrage intempestif ti cx cas
(17:29:26) TI-Bot: maufi9205 has been logged out (Timeout).
(17:29:29) noelnadal: bon @+
(17:29:32) noelnadal: :)
(17:29:41) TheMachine02: wait phasm doesn't work with cemu ? --'
(17:29:58) PT_: it works for me
(17:30:02) PT_: well
(17:30:03) PT_: kind of
(17:30:05) PT_: :troll:
(17:30:11) TheMachine02: Archive : PHASM (Utilitaires Kernels ce)
(17:30:53) PT_: I've downloaded the latest version from Cemetech Archives though
(17:31:30) TheMachine02: ok, so pham doesn't wrok on os 5.0.1 >_>
(17:31:56) PT_: Try OS 5.2.0042
(17:32:06) TheMachine02: let's try hw, it will be simpler :p
(17:32:21) PT_: hw?
(17:33:31) TheMachine02: hardware
(17:33:37) PT_: ah
(17:34:06) TheMachine02: ok so I get an Error syntax at the end :p
(17:34:11) PT_: Aaaahh
(17:34:15) PT_: And I know what the bug is
(17:34:22) PT_: It's not from PHASM, nor from ICE, nor from the OS
(17:34:23) PT_: :P
(17:34:26) TI-Bot: Frederic60150 a répondu au topic Re: redémarrage intempestif ti cx cas
(17:34:33) TheMachine02: :p
(17:34:59) TheMachine02: where does it come from ?
(17:35:18) PT_: let me explain it
(17:35:31) TI-Bot: Destroyer1409 a répondu au topic Re: Punix sur TI 92 Plus
(17:35:34) PT_: when the OS wants to run a program
(17:35:50) PT_: it moves the data from UserMem a bit upwards to make place for the ASM prgram
(17:36:02) PT_: After the program is ready, it moves them back
(17:36:05) PT_: but the bug is now
(17:36:11) TheMachine02: yeah, it move everything by 64K bytes
(17:36:19) PT_: no
(17:36:30) PT_: it moves (asm_prgm_size) bytes
(17:36:34) PT_: but the problem is...
(17:36:47) PT_: that the ASM program shifts the program TOO when calling _DelVar for exapmle!
(17:37:02) TheMachine02: yeah, but shouldn't be an issue
(17:37:07) PT_: it is
(17:37:20) TheMachine02: I mean, VAT is updated in all case
(17:37:26) PT_: because the stuff that was at the homescreen, is not shifted a bit, and random stuff is at the 'homescreen equation'
(17:37:39) PT_: so when _ParseInp continues with executing, it sees random stuff
(17:37:43) PT_: which will generate an error
(17:37:46) PT_: you see?
(17:37:56) TheMachine02: yeah
(17:38:04) PT_: Instead of Asm(prgmICE:Asm(prgmBLA it sees now 2384798eut9we45y9
(17:38:06) PT_: :troll:
(17:38:53) TheMachine02: mmhhhhh
(17:39:08) TheMachine02: huh
(17:39:13) TheMachine02: I made os crash :troll:
(17:39:33) TheMachine02: PHASM isn't handling something proprely
(17:39:39) PT_: no
(17:39:42) PT_: it's not PHASM
(17:39:51) PT_: It's the OS
(17:39:54) TheMachine02: nah I found another bug :p
(17:40:00) PT_: oh
(17:40:04) PT_: related to this?
(17:40:47) TheMachine02: running an archived program with phasm, name being 'wrong' with spaces behind and trigger a defragmenting in same time make os crash :p