Advertisement
Lesta

22 Lesta Nediam POST2017-09-06 2245 Public Posts / Sh!t Worm

Sep 8th, 2017
65
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 12.88 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam POST2017-09-06 2245 Public Posts / Sh!t Worms / Brian Hill
  2. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/LAZ6XgUtQGF
  3. https://pastebin.com/GRFxaqTv
  4. Mirror of removed post
  5. __
  6.  
  7. *THERE ARE SH!T WORMS WHO ARE HERE FOR THE WRONG REASONS. ON THE QUESTION "IS IT POSSIBLE THAT EVERY TERROR ATTACK REPORTED ON THE NIGHTLY NEWS COULD BE REAL?" ONE SH!T WORM REPLIED: "YES, I THINK THAT'S POSSIBLE YET EXTREMELY UNLIKELY" BEFORE GOING ON TO CLARIFY: "FROM MY STANDPOINT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE".*
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14. __
  15.  
  16.  
  17. This is my *final reply* to Mr Hill and I am posting it here to remind myself why he must *never* get any more of my time and attention beyond being told to _scat._
  18.  
  19.  
  20. Because this is my final word on the matter I have disabled comments. Of course - whether I enable or disable comments it will be perceived as "persecution" by Mr Hill whom I shall now refer to as *Mr sh!t worm.*
  21.  
  22.  
  23. __
  24.  
  25.  
  26. Your reply of _"Yes, I think that's possible yet extremely unlikely"_ is interesting. Genuine "conspiracy theorists" (aka "truthers") are *completely convinced* that at least _*some*_ terror attacks _*must*_ be fabricated. For those people it is *outright _impossible_* that they could _*all*_ be real. They would _never_ suggest that there is _any_ possibility - _however unlikely and remote_ - of them _all_ being real. Else they wouldn't be "truthers".
  27.  
  28.  
  29. But yet you are clinging to that possibility. You are giving an atypical answer for a supposed "truther". Your response is not what a genuine "conspiracy theorist" or "truther" would give.
  30.  
  31.  
  32. There should be no doubt in your mind that at least _*one*_ of the terror attacks reported on the nightly news was completely fabricated. Which one? Who knows _and it doesn't matter._ All that matters - as far as you should be concerned - is that you _believe_ at least _one_ was *not real* and therefore they *cannot* all be real.
  33.  
  34.  
  35. If you were not convinced that _at least one_ terror attack was fictional then you would not be a dedicated "event skeptic". But for _years_ you have conducted yourself on YouTube _as_ an "event skeptic"!
  36.  
  37.  
  38. I am sure you will pretend to not understand what I am talking about because pretending not to understand things is a reflexive behaviour of sh!t worms - so I'll give a neutral example to make it clear:
  39.  
  40.  
  41. Imagine asking someone in the "truth community" who spreads awareness about "chemtrails" the following, _"Hey - is there ANY possibility that ALL of the chemtrails you talk about are MERELY contrails?"_ and then receiving the reply, _"I think that's possible yet extremely unlikely"._
  42.  
  43.  
  44. *No.* Someone who advocates for awareness about "chemtrails" is *already convinced that "chemtrails" exist.* Maybe they don't think that every worrying sh!t streak in the sky is a "chemtrail" - and maybe they can't commit to saying _which_ are "chemtrails" and _which_ are not - but as far as they are concerned there can be *no possibility* that *ALL* of the upsetting sh!t streaks in the sky are _merely contrails._
  45.  
  46.  
  47. If a "chemtrail" truther were to give the reply, _"I think that's possible yet extremely unlikely"_ then we would instantly know that he or she wasn't a *genuine* "chemtrail" truther. _We would know that person was *pretending.*_ A chemtrail "truther poe".
  48.  
  49.  
  50. So I have to wonder - are *you* really a genuine "truther" or are you just a "truther poe"? *Even if you can't say _which event_ - how can it be that someone who spends as much time as you do scrutinising terror events (which you often characterise as dubious or staged anyway) remains unable to commit to the belief that at least _one_ of them is fake?*
  51.  
  52.  
  53. Is it that you don't even believe your own garbage whenever you talk about events as dubious and staged?!
  54.  
  55.  
  56. It doesn't make any sense. It only makes sense if we consider that you are only pretending to be a "truther". It only makes sense when we think of you as a "truther poe".
  57.  
  58.  
  59. Your response reminds me of conversations I have had in the past with people who infiltrated the genuine "truth community" only to then create division and waste the time of open-minded people. They are people who inserted themselves into the "truth community" by initially calling out certain events as fake (e.g., "Charlie Hebdo", "Sandy Hook", the "Boston Marathon Bombing") but then later on - when pressed - *they refuse to express an opinion on it.*
  60.  
  61.  
  62. Once they inserted themselves into the "truth community" they began creating division and wasting everyone's time. It's eerie how similar their pattern of *treacherous* activities resembles *yours* when it comes to me.
  63.  
  64.  
  65. You relentlessly seek to undermine and encourage doubt in me. Without waver you seek to bring about division amongst those I talk to by trying to plant in their minds the *perniciously false* idea that I am a "liar", a "shill" and using "lie system techniques" on others.
  66.  
  67.  
  68. While pretending to be civil to me I have caught you elsewhere encouraging others to think of me as a "shill" in cahoots with others who _are_ accepted as "shills".
  69.  
  70.  
  71. When I have attacked dishonest people in the past for their dishonesty you have not helped me to get the word out about it but instead suggested it was manufactured drama and that I was in on it. Well, I am most definitely admonishing *your* dishonesty so I wonder whether you'll be consistent and claim this is manufactured drama and that we are secretly in cahoots. Joker.
  72.  
  73.  
  74. You are a nasty and spiteful piece of work. Yet despite knowing this about you I have continued to talk to you - hopeful I might yet reach you. But you - Mr sh!t worm - are beyond the reach of my help.
  75.  
  76.  
  77. You have wasted too many hours of my time - practically _every_ thread I have _ever_ talked to you on has been proof of that. It is time for that to stop.
  78.  
  79.  
  80. You are guilt of these things. You are a guilty little sh!t worm and I have had enough.
  81.  
  82.  
  83. As for me - I can confidently declare - _and explain_ - that it *really is possible* for *every* terror attack that has *ever* been reported on the nightly news to have been _real_ *because that is a distinct possibility which cannot be ignored, disregarded or downplayed when one has a correct understanding of the lie system.*
  84.  
  85.  
  86. But that's not how it always was. Like every other *genuine* truther I started out _believing_ that at least _some_ terror attacks had been completely staged. During an obsessive phase of intensely scrutinising events in early 2015 I discovered a *recurring pattern.* A genuine signal that could be discerned from the noise. *A pattern that yields predictive power.*
  87.  
  88.  
  89. It was then that the lie system was discovered and I have continued to uncover it. As I did so my thinking rapidly advanced while yours continued to lag. From the outset I have freely shared and discussed *everything* I figured out about the lie system. All you have done since then is cover your ears, close your eyes and continue wasting my time.
  90.  
  91.  
  92. What matters most - Mr sh!t worm - is not so much the events themselves (though they do matter) but _the special way_ in which they are routinely presented to the population. The lie system's "presentation protocol". *But you do not have an understanding of the lie system like that to fall back on because you have _habitually denied_ the lie system and its presentation protocol that I have painstakingly documented and described over the years.*
  93.  
  94.  
  95. Every "truther" starts out much the same and that's why every *genuine* "truther" can easily, instantly and unequivocally reject the possibility that every "terror attack" has been real. Every genuine truther carries on in that way _until_ they acquire *a correct understanding of the lie system* and rise above the *planned dichotomy* of *"hoaxtard"* versus *"realtard".*
  96.  
  97.  
  98. But you don't have a correct understanding of the lie system and you haven't risen above that planned dichotomy. So there must be some _other_ reason as to why you cannot easily, instantly and unequivocally rule out the possibility that "all terror attacks are real" even though you conduct yourself on YouTube as a "truther" - but yet clinging to that possibility is in contradistinction to genuine "truthers".
  99.  
  100.  
  101. Why are you such a wriggly little sh!t worm, Mr Hill? Why?! That you are a "truther poe" is just one possibility.
  102.  
  103.  
  104. Personally - I don't think you are a "paid government troll". While your actions are similar to those carrying out an agenda to target and undermine open-minded people I think with you there is a less grandiose explanation.
  105.  
  106.  
  107. Could it be that you are somehow mixed up in a *vigilante Internet group* that monitors open-minded people and endlessly wastes their time? Perhaps, but I don't think that's the reality, either.
  108.  
  109.  
  110. What I think is going on is much simpler. I think that you - Mr Hill - are just a *lowly garden-variety sh!t worm* whose nature compels you to keep every door of possibility open - _if only by a crack_ - just in case you need to wriggle your stinky little sh!t stained self back through it.
  111.  
  112.  
  113. That's what I think, Mr Hill. That's what I think you're all about. That's why you can't commit to saying, _"I am an event skeptic and I do not accept that every terror event could have been real"._ Even though every genuine truther can say those words with ease - you need to keep open a window of possibility (however unlikely) because you are not a genuine truther.
  114.  
  115.  
  116. I think that if I asked whether you thought it possible everyone in the world was really a mechanical robot - _including yourself_ - with a wiggle and a grin you'd reply, _"I think that's possible yet extremely unlikely"._
  117.  
  118.  
  119. Like all worthless sh!t worms you just can't commit to a position on something even when there's no controversy in holding it. Even when there is nothing to lose by holding it.
  120.  
  121.  
  122. But yet you have no problem - _no hesitation_ - telling anyone who is dumb and resentful enough to listen that Lesta is a "liar", a "shill" and someone who is using "lie system techniques" to (presumably) mess with the minds of others.
  123.  
  124.  
  125. On that I am sure you'll always find others who listen. That's because in pursuit of the truth I don't mind treading on someone's toes and resentful people with delicate egos always make time for losers who are sh!t talking about the one who has upset them.
  126.  
  127.  
  128. *Besides - it is natural for sh!t worms to unite and clump together.*
  129.  
  130.  
  131. You can't seem to commit to *any* position on anything _except one that hates on Lesta!_ Hating on Lesta is a position that's universally clung to by _every_ sh!t worm like you!
  132.  
  133.  
  134. As a faux "truther" you can't say that there are definitely _*any*_ fake terror attacks but in your paranoid sh!t worm mind you have no doubt that Lesta is a "liar", a "shill" and using "lie system techniques".
  135.  
  136.  
  137. Despite saying that you give straight answers - you don't. You just don't. You are a wriggly little sh!t smearing worm. *There is no possible way to reason with you or have a productive conversation that goes anywhere.*
  138.  
  139.  
  140. That's why my time with you must come to an end. Otherwise it will just go around and around in circles.
  141.  
  142.  
  143. It is easy for you to claim that I am wrong about the lie system when all you do is deny deny deny whatever I say. It is easy to claim I am wrong about the lie system when all you do is ask ask ask but never pay attention to the answers or take the time to properly look.
  144.  
  145.  
  146. Just as it's easy for dummies to deny there is an "ISS" that whizzes past in the sky above if they never look up and through a telescope, it's easy for sh!t worms to clump together and deny the lie system when they have no intention of ever recognising it anyway.
  147.  
  148.  
  149. Whatever you may be you are not a genuine "truther". You are not here for the right reasons. You are a time-wasting sh!t worm who denies and denies before shifting the goalposts and denying everything all over again.
  150.  
  151.  
  152. You say it's possible but then you say it's impossible. You say there is intent but then you say there's no intent.
  153.  
  154.  
  155. *You want your sh!t cake and to wriggle about in it too.*
  156.  
  157.  
  158. Well - wriggle all you want you spineless sh!t worm. *You are an intellectual nobody and after all of this wasted time Lesta is resolutely done with wasting any more on you.*
  159.  
  160.  
  161. Hiss and spit and carry on like an enraged demon but what you say and do does not matter. Go ahead and make anti-Lesta videos. Go ahead and share anti-Lesta posts and comments. Go ahead and sh!t talk to everyone about Lesta. Be my guest! *None of it means anything when it comes from lowly and jealous bottom-feeding sh!t worms like you.*
  162.  
  163.  
  164.  
  165.  
  166.  
  167. __
  168.  
  169. Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VYGRa4q9ds&lc=z223vbi5su2gsjev4acdp43bfyptkibtk2mhfqstimlw03c010c
  170.  
  171. ____________________________________________________________
  172. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  173.  
  174. _Lesta on YouTube:_
  175. https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ
  176.  
  177. _Lesta on Twitter:_
  178. https://twitter.com/lestanediam
  179.  
  180. _Lesta on Google Plus:_
  181. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  182.  
  183. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  184. What exists - exists to always exist.
  185. As it is written - _so it is done._
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement