API tools faq
paste
Guest User

LOG of NAS DATA Recovery Tool

a guest
Feb 27th, 2015
271
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 58.66 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Testing 4 drives...
  2. Parsing partition tables for 4 drives...
  3. Parsing partition table for DISK0:, 976,773,168 sectors (466 GB)...
  4. Drive DISK0: has 1 partitions
  5. Partition #1 at sector 2,048, 1,953,562,624 sectors: NTFS (7)
  6. Parsing partition table for DISK1:, 488,397,168 sectors (233 GB)...
  7. Drive DISK1: has 2 partitions
  8. Partition #1 at sector 256, 4,980,480 sectors: Linux RAID partition (253)
  9. Partition #2 at sector 4,980,736, 4,194,304 sectors: Linux RAID partition (253)
  10. Parsing partition table for DISK2:, 488,397,168 sectors (233 GB)...
  11. Drive DISK2: has 1 partitions
  12. Partition #1 at sector 63, 488,392,002 sectors: NTFS (7) NTFS
  13. Parsing partition table for DISK5:, 625,142,448 sectors (298 GB)...
  14. Drive DISK5: has 1 partitions
  15. Partition #1 at sector 63, 625,137,282 sectors: NTFS (7) NTFS
  16. StartSector 2048, 1953562624 sectors is possible data start on drive DISK0:
  17. StartSector 256, 4980480 sectors is possible data start on drive DISK1:
  18. StartSector 63, 488392002 sectors is possible data start on drive DISK2:
  19. StartSector 63, 625137282 sectors is possible data start on drive DISK5:
  20. Creating RAID list...
  21. Testing possible start 2,048 (length 1,953,562,624)...
  22. ...for XFS superblock on DISK0:
  23. ...for XFS superblock on DISK1:
  24. ...for XFS superblock on DISK2:
  25. ...for XFS superblock on DISK5:
  26. ...for EXT2FS superblock on DISK0:
  27. ...for EXT2FS superblock on DISK1:
  28. ...for EXT2FS superblock on DISK2:
  29. ...for EXT2FS superblock on DISK5:
  30. Search LVM...
  31. ...on DISK0:
  32. ...on DISK1:
  33. ...on DISK2:
  34. ...on DISK5:
  35. Testing possible start 256 (length 4,980,480)...
  36. ...for XFS superblock on DISK0:
  37. ...for XFS superblock on DISK1:
  38. ...for XFS superblock on DISK2:
  39. ...for XFS superblock on DISK5:
  40. ...for EXT2FS superblock on DISK0:
  41. ...for EXT2FS superblock on DISK1:
  42. ...valid EXT2FS superblock found, building RAID
  43. ...adding DISK0:
  44. ...adding DISK1:
  45. ...adding DISK2:
  46. ...adding DISK5:
  47. Testing possible start 63 (length 488,392,002)...
  48. ...for XFS superblock on DISK0:
  49. ...for XFS superblock on DISK1:
  50. ...for XFS superblock on DISK2:
  51. ...for XFS superblock on DISK5:
  52. ...for EXT2FS superblock on DISK0:
  53. ...for EXT2FS superblock on DISK1:
  54. ...for EXT2FS superblock on DISK2:
  55. ...for EXT2FS superblock on DISK5:
  56. Search LVM...
  57. ...on DISK0:
  58. ...on DISK1:
  59. ...on DISK2:
  60. ...on DISK5:
  61. Completing RAID list...
  62. Setting level of RAID no 0 to 5
  63. Finding drive order...
  64. Testing 96 possible drive orders with a probe size of 5,000,000 sectors, requiring 20%
  65. Testing stripe sizes: [128], 32,128
  66. Smallest tested stripe size: 32
  67. Testing rotations: [left-symmetric], left-asymmetric,left-symmetric
  68. Checked sector: 0
  69. Best combination after 100032 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0870 versus 0.0907 (4%)
  70. Best combination after 110016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0967 versus 0.1019 (5%)
  71. Best combination after 120000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1029 versus 0.1071 (4%)
  72. Best combination after 130016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1077 versus 0.1127 (5%)
  73. Best combination after 140000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1128 versus 0.1186 (5%)
  74. Best combination after 150016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1175 versus 0.1223 (4%)
  75. Best combination after 160000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1158 versus 0.1220 (5%)
  76. Best combination after 170016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1139 versus 0.1212 (6%)
  77. Best combination after 180000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1099 versus 0.1172 (7%)
  78. Best combination after 190016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1135 versus 0.1225 (8%)
  79. Best combination after 200000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1137 versus 0.1220 (7%)
  80. Best combination after 210016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1126 versus 0.1210 (8%)
  81. Best combination after 220000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1113 versus 0.1194 (7%)
  82. Best combination after 230016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1100 versus 0.1177 (7%)
  83. Best combination after 240000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1111 versus 0.1182 (6%)
  84. Best combination after 250016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1107 versus 0.1189 (7%)
  85. Best combination after 260000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1108 versus 0.1186 (7%)
  86. Best combination after 270016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1128 versus 0.1208 (7%)
  87. Best combination after 280000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1131 versus 0.1198 (6%)
  88. Best combination after 290016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1099 versus 0.1165 (6%)
  89. Best combination after 300000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1068 versus 0.1131 (6%)
  90. Best combination after 310016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1036 versus 0.1097 (6%)
  91. Best combination after 320000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1006 versus 0.1065 (6%)
  92. Best combination after 330016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0981 versus 0.1039 (6%)
  93. Best combination after 340000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0960 versus 0.1016 (6%)
  94. Best combination after 350016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0938 versus 0.0992 (6%)
  95. Best combination after 360000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0919 versus 0.0973 (6%)
  96. Best combination after 370016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0901 versus 0.0954 (6%)
  97. Best combination after 380000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0901 versus 0.0952 (6%)
  98. Best combination after 390016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0910 versus 0.0960 (5%)
  99. Best combination after 400000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0932 versus 0.0986 (6%)
  100. Best combination after 410016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0940 versus 0.1005 (7%)
  101. Best combination after 420000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0939 versus 0.1008 (7%)
  102. Best combination after 430016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0951 versus 0.1019 (7%)
  103. Best combination after 440000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0962 versus 0.1039 (8%)
  104. Best combination after 450016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0956 versus 0.1032 (8%)
  105. Best combination after 460000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0941 versus 0.1015 (8%)
  106. Best combination after 470016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0926 versus 0.0999 (8%)
  107. Best combination after 480000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0911 versus 0.0982 (8%)
  108. Best combination after 490016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0897 versus 0.0967 (8%)
  109. Best combination after 500000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0883 versus 0.0951 (8%)
  110. Best combination after 510016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0870 versus 0.0937 (8%)
  111. Best combination after 520000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0864 versus 0.0930 (8%)
  112. Best combination after 530016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0848 versus 0.0914 (8%)
  113. Best combination after 540000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0834 versus 0.0898 (8%)
  114. Best combination after 550016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0819 versus 0.0882 (8%)
  115. Best combination after 560000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0805 versus 0.0867 (8%)
  116. Best combination after 570016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0792 versus 0.0853 (8%)
  117. Best combination after 580000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0779 versus 0.0839 (8%)
  118. Best combination after 590016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0767 versus 0.0826 (8%)
  119. Best combination after 600000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0755 versus 0.0813 (8%)
  120. Best combination after 610016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0762 versus 0.0818 (7%)
  121. Best combination after 620000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0777 versus 0.0832 (7%)
  122. Best combination after 630016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0784 versus 0.0842 (7%)
  123. Best combination after 640000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0792 versus 0.0854 (8%)
  124. Best combination after 650016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0813 versus 0.0876 (8%)
  125. Best combination after 660000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0827 versus 0.0888 (7%)
  126. Best combination after 670016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0846 versus 0.0906 (7%)
  127. Best combination after 680000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0857 versus 0.0915 (7%)
  128. Best combination after 690016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0862 versus 0.0916 (6%)
  129. Best combination after 700000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0872 versus 0.0922 (6%)
  130. Best combination after 710016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0872 versus 0.0919 (5%)
  131. Best combination after 720000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0880 versus 0.0921 (5%)
  132. Best combination after 730016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0894 versus 0.0936 (5%)
  133. Best combination after 740000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0913 versus 0.0948 (4%)
  134. Best combination after 750016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0935 versus 0.0958 (2%)
  135. Best combination after 760000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0935 versus 0.0960 (3%)
  136. Best combination after 770016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0946 versus 0.0971 (3%)
  137. Best combination after 780000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0944 versus 0.0968 (3%)
  138. Best combination after 790016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0945 versus 0.0969 (3%)
  139. Best combination after 800000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0947 versus 0.0970 (2%)
  140. Best combination after 810016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0959 versus 0.0974 (2%)
  141. Best combination after 820000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0953 versus 0.0971 (2%)
  142. Best combination after 830016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0959 versus 0.0978 (2%)
  143. Best combination after 840000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0958 versus 0.0977 (2%)
  144. Best combination after 850016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0959 versus 0.0982 (2%)
  145. Best combination after 860000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0964 versus 0.0986 (2%)
  146. Best combination after 870016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0974 versus 0.0991 (2%)
  147. Best combination after 880000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0976 versus 0.0994 (2%)
  148. Best combination after 890016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0978 versus 0.0995 (2%)
  149. Best combination after 900000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0973 versus 0.0989 (2%)
  150. Best combination after 910016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0971 versus 0.0987 (2%)
  151. Best combination after 920000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0969 versus 0.0986 (2%)
  152. Best combination after 930016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0980 versus 0.0992 (1%)
  153. Best combination after 940000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0986 versus 0.0998 (1%)
  154. Best combination after 950016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0983 versus 0.0995 (1%)
  155. Best combination after 960000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0981 versus 0.0994 (1%)
  156. Best combination after 970016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0972 versus 0.0984 (1%)
  157. Best combination after 980000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0963 versus 0.0976 (1%)
  158. Best combination after 990016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0954 versus 0.0967 (1%)
  159. Best combination after 1000000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0945 versus 0.0958 (1%)
  160. Best combination after 1010016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0937 versus 0.0949 (1%)
  161. Best combination after 1020000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0930 versus 0.0943 (1%)
  162. Best combination after 1030016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0922 versus 0.0934 (1%)
  163. Best combination after 1040000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0914 versus 0.0927 (1%)
  164. Best combination after 1050016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0907 versus 0.0920 (1%)
  165. Best combination after 1060000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0900 versus 0.0913 (1%)
  166. Best combination after 1070016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0894 versus 0.0906 (1%)
  167. Best combination after 1080000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0886 versus 0.0899 (1%)
  168. Best combination after 1090016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0880 versus 0.0893 (2%)
  169. Best combination after 1100000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0873 versus 0.0886 (2%)
  170. Best combination after 1110016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0865 versus 0.0879 (2%)
  171. Best combination after 1120000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0858 versus 0.0872 (2%)
  172. Best combination after 1130016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0852 versus 0.0865 (2%)
  173. Best combination after 1140000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0845 versus 0.0858 (2%)
  174. Best combination after 1150016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0838 versus 0.0851 (2%)
  175. Best combination after 1160000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0832 versus 0.0844 (2%)
  176. Best combination after 1170016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0826 versus 0.0839 (2%)
  177. Best combination after 1180000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0820 versus 0.0833 (2%)
  178. Best combination after 1190016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0815 versus 0.0828 (2%)
  179. Best combination after 1200000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0809 versus 0.0822 (2%)
  180. Best combination after 1210016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0804 versus 0.0817 (2%)
  181. Best combination after 1220000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0798 versus 0.0811 (2%)
  182. Best combination after 1230016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0793 versus 0.0805 (2%)
  183. Best combination after 1240000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0788 versus 0.0800 (2%)
  184. Best combination after 1250016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0782 versus 0.0794 (2%)
  185. Best combination after 1260000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0777 versus 0.0789 (2%)
  186. Best combination after 1270016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0771 versus 0.0783 (2%)
  187. Best combination after 1280000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0766 versus 0.0778 (2%)
  188. Best combination after 1290016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0761 versus 0.0772 (2%)
  189. Best combination after 1300000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0756 versus 0.0767 (2%)
  190. Best combination after 1310016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0753 versus 0.0765 (2%)
  191. Best combination after 1320000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0768 versus 0.0779 (1%)
  192. Best combination after 1330016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0783 versus 0.0794 (1%)
  193. Best combination after 1340000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0803 versus 0.0814 (1%)
  194. Best combination after 1350016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0818 versus 0.0829 (1%)
  195. Best combination after 1360000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0844 versus 0.0855 (1%)
  196. Best combination after 1370016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0874 versus 0.0884 (1%)
  197. Best combination after 1380000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0901 versus 0.0912 (1%)
  198. Best combination after 1390016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0929 versus 0.0940 (1%)
  199. Best combination after 1400000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0956 versus 0.0966 (1%)
  200. Best combination after 1410016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0985 versus 0.0995 (1%)
  201. Best combination after 1420000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1011 versus 0.1021 (1%)
  202. Best combination after 1430016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1038 versus 0.1047 (1%)
  203. Best combination after 1440000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1063 versus 0.1072 (1%)
  204. Best combination after 1450016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1089 versus 0.1098 (1%)
  205. Best combination after 1460000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1113 versus 0.1122 (1%)
  206. Best combination after 1470016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1139 versus 0.1148 (1%)
  207. Best combination after 1480000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1149 versus 0.1158 (1%)
  208. Best combination after 1490016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1146 versus 0.1156 (1%)
  209. Best combination after 1500000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1143 versus 0.1152 (1%)
  210. Best combination after 1510016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1136 versus 0.1145 (1%)
  211. Best combination after 1520000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1129 versus 0.1138 (1%)
  212. Best combination after 1530016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1122 versus 0.1131 (1%)
  213. Best combination after 1540000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1116 versus 0.1125 (1%)
  214. Best combination after 1550016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1109 versus 0.1118 (1%)
  215. Best combination after 1560000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1103 versus 0.1112 (1%)
  216. Best combination after 1570016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1097 versus 0.1106 (1%)
  217. Best combination after 1580000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1091 versus 0.1100 (1%)
  218. Best combination after 1590016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1085 versus 0.1094 (1%)
  219. Best combination after 1600000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1079 versus 0.1087 (1%)
  220. Best combination after 1610016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1073 versus 0.1081 (1%)
  221. Best combination after 1620000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1067 versus 0.1076 (1%)
  222. Best combination after 1630016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1062 versus 0.1070 (1%)
  223. Best combination after 1640000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1058 versus 0.1068 (1%)
  224. Best combination after 1650016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1052 versus 0.1062 (1%)
  225. Best combination after 1660000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1047 versus 0.1056 (1%)
  226. Best combination after 1670016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1041 versus 0.1051 (1%)
  227. Best combination after 1680000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1036 versus 0.1045 (1%)
  228. Best combination after 1690016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1030 versus 0.1040 (1%)
  229. Best combination after 1700000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1027 versus 0.1037 (1%)
  230. Best combination after 1710016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1023 versus 0.1033 (1%)
  231. Best combination after 1720000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1020 versus 0.1030 (1%)
  232. Best combination after 1730016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1017 versus 0.1026 (1%)
  233. Best combination after 1740000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1013 versus 0.1022 (1%)
  234. Best combination after 1750016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1009 versus 0.1019 (1%)
  235. Best combination after 1760000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1005 versus 0.1015 (1%)
  236. Best combination after 1770016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1002 versus 0.1011 (1%)
  237. Best combination after 1780000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.1000 versus 0.1010 (1%)
  238. Best combination after 1790016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0997 versus 0.1007 (1%)
  239. Best combination after 1800000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0994 versus 0.1004 (1%)
  240. Best combination after 1810016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0990 versus 0.1000 (1%)
  241. Best combination after 1820000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0987 versus 0.0997 (1%)
  242. Best combination after 1830016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0984 versus 0.0994 (1%)
  243. Best combination after 1840000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0981 versus 0.0991 (1%)
  244. Best combination after 1850016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0978 versus 0.0988 (1%)
  245. Best combination after 1860000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0975 versus 0.0985 (1%)
  246. Best combination after 1870016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0972 versus 0.0982 (1%)
  247. Best combination after 1880000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0970 versus 0.0979 (1%)
  248. Best combination after 1890016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0967 versus 0.0976 (1%)
  249. Best combination after 1900000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0964 versus 0.0973 (1%)
  250. Best combination after 1910016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0961 versus 0.0971 (1%)
  251. Best combination after 1920000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0959 versus 0.0968 (1%)
  252. Best combination after 1930016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0956 versus 0.0965 (1%)
  253. Best combination after 1940000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0954 versus 0.0963 (1%)
  254. Best combination after 1950016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0951 versus 0.0960 (1%)
  255. Best combination after 1960000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0948 versus 0.0957 (1%)
  256. Best combination after 1970016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0945 versus 0.0954 (1%)
  257. Best combination after 1980000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0942 versus 0.0952 (1%)
  258. Best combination after 1990016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0940 versus 0.0949 (1%)
  259. Best combination after 2000000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0938 versus 0.0947 (1%)
  260. Best combination after 2010016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0935 versus 0.0944 (1%)
  261. Best combination after 2020000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0932 versus 0.0941 (1%)
  262. Best combination after 2030016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0928 versus 0.0938 (1%)
  263. Best combination after 2040000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0925 versus 0.0935 (1%)
  264. Best combination after 2050016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0922 versus 0.0932 (1%)
  265. Best combination after 2060000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0919 versus 0.0929 (1%)
  266. Best combination after 2070016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0917 versus 0.0926 (1%)
  267. Best combination after 2080000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0915 versus 0.0924 (1%)
  268. Best combination after 2090016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0913 versus 0.0922 (1%)
  269. Best combination after 2100000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0910 versus 0.0919 (1%)
  270. Best combination after 2110016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0908 versus 0.0916 (1%)
  271. Best combination after 2120000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0905 versus 0.0913 (1%)
  272. Best combination after 2130016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0902 versus 0.0910 (1%)
  273. Best combination after 2140000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0899 versus 0.0908 (1%)
  274. Best combination after 2150016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0897 versus 0.0906 (1%)
  275. Best combination after 2160000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0895 versus 0.0904 (1%)
  276. Best combination after 2170016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0893 versus 0.0901 (1%)
  277. Best combination after 2180000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0890 versus 0.0899 (1%)
  278. Best combination after 2190016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0888 versus 0.0897 (1%)
  279. Best combination after 2200000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0886 versus 0.0895 (1%)
  280. Best combination after 2210016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0884 versus 0.0893 (1%)
  281. Best combination after 2220000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0883 versus 0.0891 (1%)
  282. Best combination after 2230016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0880 versus 0.0889 (1%)
  283. Best combination after 2240000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0878 versus 0.0887 (1%)
  284. Best combination after 2250016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0876 versus 0.0884 (1%)
  285. Best combination after 2260000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0873 versus 0.0882 (1%)
  286. Best combination after 2270016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0871 versus 0.0880 (1%)
  287. Best combination after 2280000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0869 versus 0.0877 (1%)
  288. Best combination after 2290016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0867 versus 0.0875 (1%)
  289. Best combination after 2300000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0866 versus 0.0873 (1%)
  290. Best combination after 2310016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0864 versus 0.0872 (1%)
  291. Best combination after 2320000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0862 versus 0.0869 (1%)
  292. Best combination after 2330016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0859 versus 0.0866 (1%)
  293. Best combination after 2340000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0856 versus 0.0864 (1%)
  294. Best combination after 2350016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0854 versus 0.0861 (1%)
  295. Best combination after 2360000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0852 versus 0.0859 (1%)
  296. Best combination after 2370016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0849 versus 0.0857 (1%)
  297. Best combination after 2380000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0848 versus 0.0855 (1%)
  298. Best combination after 2390016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0846 versus 0.0853 (1%)
  299. Best combination after 2400000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0844 versus 0.0851 (1%)
  300. Best combination after 2410016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0842 versus 0.0849 (1%)
  301. Best combination after 2420000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0840 versus 0.0848 (1%)
  302. Best combination after 2430016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0838 versus 0.0845 (1%)
  303. Best combination after 2440000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0837 versus 0.0844 (1%)
  304. Best combination after 2450016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0833 versus 0.0841 (1%)
  305. Best combination after 2460000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0830 versus 0.0838 (1%)
  306. Best combination after 2470016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0827 versus 0.0835 (1%)
  307. Best combination after 2480000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0824 versus 0.0832 (1%)
  308. Best combination after 2490016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0821 versus 0.0829 (1%)
  309. Best combination after 2500000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0818 versus 0.0825 (1%)
  310. Best combination after 2510016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0815 versus 0.0822 (1%)
  311. Best combination after 2520000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0812 versus 0.0819 (1%)
  312. Best combination after 2530016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0809 versus 0.0816 (1%)
  313. Best combination after 2540000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0806 versus 0.0813 (1%)
  314. Best combination after 2550016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0803 versus 0.0810 (1%)
  315. Best combination after 2560000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0800 versus 0.0807 (1%)
  316. Best combination after 2570016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0797 versus 0.0804 (1%)
  317. Best combination after 2580000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0794 versus 0.0802 (1%)
  318. Best combination after 2590016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0791 versus 0.0799 (1%)
  319. Best combination after 2600000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0788 versus 0.0796 (1%)
  320. Best combination after 2610016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0786 versus 0.0793 (1%)
  321. Best combination after 2620000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0783 versus 0.0790 (1%)
  322. Best combination after 2630016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0780 versus 0.0787 (1%)
  323. Best combination after 2640000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0777 versus 0.0785 (1%)
  324. Best combination after 2650016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0775 versus 0.0782 (1%)
  325. Best combination after 2660000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0772 versus 0.0779 (1%)
  326. Best combination after 2670016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0769 versus 0.0776 (1%)
  327. Best combination after 2680000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0766 versus 0.0774 (1%)
  328. Best combination after 2690016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0764 versus 0.0771 (1%)
  329. Best combination after 2700000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0761 versus 0.0768 (1%)
  330. Best combination after 2710016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0758 versus 0.0766 (1%)
  331. Best combination after 2720000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0756 versus 0.0763 (1%)
  332. Best combination after 2730016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0753 versus 0.0760 (1%)
  333. Best combination after 2740000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0751 versus 0.0758 (1%)
  334. Best combination after 2750016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0748 versus 0.0755 (1%)
  335. Best combination after 2760000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0746 versus 0.0753 (1%)
  336. Best combination after 2770016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0743 versus 0.0750 (1%)
  337. Best combination after 2780000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0741 versus 0.0748 (1%)
  338. Best combination after 2790016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0738 versus 0.0745 (1%)
  339. Best combination after 2800000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0736 versus 0.0743 (1%)
  340. Best combination after 2810016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0733 versus 0.0740 (1%)
  341. Best combination after 2820000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0731 versus 0.0738 (1%)
  342. Best combination after 2830016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0729 versus 0.0735 (1%)
  343. Best combination after 2840000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0726 versus 0.0733 (1%)
  344. Best combination after 2850016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0724 versus 0.0731 (1%)
  345. Best combination after 2860000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0721 versus 0.0728 (1%)
  346. Best combination after 2870016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0719 versus 0.0726 (1%)
  347. Best combination after 2880000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0717 versus 0.0724 (1%)
  348. Best combination after 2890016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0714 versus 0.0721 (1%)
  349. Best combination after 2900000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0712 versus 0.0719 (1%)
  350. Best combination after 2910016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0710 versus 0.0717 (1%)
  351. Best combination after 2920000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0708 versus 0.0714 (1%)
  352. Best combination after 2930016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0705 versus 0.0712 (1%)
  353. Best combination after 2940000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0704 versus 0.0711 (1%)
  354. Best combination after 2950016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0702 versus 0.0709 (1%)
  355. Best combination after 2960000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0700 versus 0.0706 (1%)
  356. Best combination after 2970016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0698 versus 0.0704 (1%)
  357. Best combination after 2980000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0696 versus 0.0703 (1%)
  358. Best combination after 2990016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0694 versus 0.0700 (1%)
  359. Best combination after 3000000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0692 versus 0.0698 (1%)
  360. Best combination after 3010016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0690 versus 0.0696 (1%)
  361. Best combination after 3020000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0688 versus 0.0694 (1%)
  362. Best combination after 3030016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0686 versus 0.0692 (1%)
  363. Best combination after 3040000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0684 versus 0.0690 (1%)
  364. Best combination after 3050016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0682 versus 0.0688 (1%)
  365. Best combination after 3060000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0680 versus 0.0686 (1%)
  366. Best combination after 3070016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0678 versus 0.0684 (1%)
  367. Best combination after 3080000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0676 versus 0.0683 (1%)
  368. Best combination after 3090016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0675 versus 0.0681 (1%)
  369. Best combination after 3100000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0673 versus 0.0679 (1%)
  370. Best combination after 3110016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0671 versus 0.0677 (1%)
  371. Best combination after 3120000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0669 versus 0.0676 (1%)
  372. Best combination after 3130016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0668 versus 0.0674 (1%)
  373. Best combination after 3140000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0667 versus 0.0673 (1%)
  374. Best combination after 3150016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0665 versus 0.0671 (1%)
  375. Best combination after 3160000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0663 versus 0.0669 (1%)
  376. Best combination after 3170016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0661 versus 0.0668 (1%)
  377. Best combination after 3180000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0660 versus 0.0666 (1%)
  378. Best combination after 3190016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0658 versus 0.0664 (1%)
  379. Best combination after 3200000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0656 versus 0.0662 (1%)
  380. Best combination after 3210016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0654 versus 0.0660 (1%)
  381. Best combination after 3220000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0653 versus 0.0659 (1%)
  382. Best combination after 3230016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0652 versus 0.0658 (1%)
  383. Best combination after 3240000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0650 versus 0.0656 (1%)
  384. Best combination after 3250016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0649 versus 0.0655 (1%)
  385. Best combination after 3260000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0647 versus 0.0653 (1%)
  386. Best combination after 3270016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0645 versus 0.0651 (1%)
  387. Best combination after 3280000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0644 versus 0.0650 (1%)
  388. Best combination after 3290016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0642 versus 0.0648 (1%)
  389. Best combination after 3300000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0641 versus 0.0647 (1%)
  390. Best combination after 3310016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0639 versus 0.0645 (1%)
  391. Best combination after 3320000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0638 versus 0.0643 (1%)
  392. Best combination after 3330016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0636 versus 0.0642 (1%)
  393. Best combination after 3340000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0635 versus 0.0640 (1%)
  394. Best combination after 3350016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0633 versus 0.0639 (1%)
  395. Best combination after 3360000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0632 versus 0.0637 (1%)
  396. Best combination after 3370016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0630 versus 0.0635 (1%)
  397. Best combination after 3380000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0629 versus 0.0634 (1%)
  398. Best combination after 3390016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0628 versus 0.0633 (1%)
  399. Best combination after 3400000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0626 versus 0.0631 (1%)
  400. Best combination after 3410016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0625 versus 0.0630 (1%)
  401. Best combination after 3420000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0623 versus 0.0628 (1%)
  402. Best combination after 3430016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0622 versus 0.0627 (1%)
  403. Best combination after 3440000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0620 versus 0.0625 (1%)
  404. Best combination after 3450016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0619 versus 0.0624 (1%)
  405. Best combination after 3460000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0617 versus 0.0622 (1%)
  406. Best combination after 3470016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0616 versus 0.0621 (1%)
  407. Best combination after 3480000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0616 versus 0.0621 (1%)
  408. Best combination after 3490016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0615 versus 0.0620 (1%)
  409. Best combination after 3500000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0615 versus 0.0620 (1%)
  410. Best combination after 3510016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0614 versus 0.0620 (1%)
  411. Best combination after 3520000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0614 versus 0.0619 (1%)
  412. Best combination after 3530016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0614 versus 0.0619 (1%)
  413. Best combination after 3540000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0614 versus 0.0619 (1%)
  414. Best combination after 3550016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0615 versus 0.0620 (1%)
  415. Best combination after 3560000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0614 versus 0.0620 (1%)
  416. Best combination after 3570016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0614 versus 0.0620 (1%)
  417. Best combination after 3580000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0614 versus 0.0619 (1%)
  418. Best combination after 3590016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0614 versus 0.0619 (1%)
  419. Best combination after 3600000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0613 versus 0.0618 (1%)
  420. Best combination after 3610016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0613 versus 0.0618 (1%)
  421. Best combination after 3620000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0612 versus 0.0617 (1%)
  422. Best combination after 3630016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0611 versus 0.0616 (1%)
  423. Best combination after 3640000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0609 versus 0.0615 (1%)
  424. Best combination after 3650016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0608 versus 0.0613 (1%)
  425. Best combination after 3660000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0607 versus 0.0612 (1%)
  426. Best combination after 3670016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0606 versus 0.0611 (1%)
  427. Best combination after 3680000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0605 versus 0.0610 (1%)
  428. Best combination after 3690016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0604 versus 0.0609 (1%)
  429. Best combination after 3700000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0602 versus 0.0607 (1%)
  430. Best combination after 3710016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0601 versus 0.0606 (1%)
  431. Best combination after 3720000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0600 versus 0.0605 (1%)
  432. Best combination after 3730016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0599 versus 0.0603 (1%)
  433. Best combination after 3740000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0597 versus 0.0602 (1%)
  434. Best combination after 3750016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0596 versus 0.0601 (1%)
  435. Best combination after 3760000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0596 versus 0.0601 (1%)
  436. Best combination after 3770016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0594 versus 0.0600 (1%)
  437. Best combination after 3780000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0593 versus 0.0598 (1%)
  438. Best combination after 3790016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0592 versus 0.0597 (1%)
  439. Best combination after 3800000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0591 versus 0.0596 (1%)
  440. Best combination after 3810016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0590 versus 0.0595 (1%)
  441. Best combination after 3820000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0591 versus 0.0597 (1%)
  442. Best combination after 3830016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0593 versus 0.0598 (1%)
  443. Best combination after 3840000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0594 versus 0.0599 (1%)
  444. Best combination after 3850016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0595 versus 0.0600 (1%)
  445. Best combination after 3860000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0593 versus 0.0599 (1%)
  446. Best combination after 3870016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0593 versus 0.0599 (1%)
  447. Best combination after 3880000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0594 versus 0.0600 (1%)
  448. Best combination after 3890016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0596 versus 0.0601 (1%)
  449. Best combination after 3900000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0596 versus 0.0602 (1%)
  450. Best combination after 3910016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0598 versus 0.0602 (1%)
  451. Best combination after 3920000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0598 versus 0.0603 (1%)
  452. Best combination after 3930016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0597 versus 0.0602 (1%)
  453. Best combination after 3940000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0599 versus 0.0604 (1%)
  454. Best combination after 3950016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0600 versus 0.0605 (1%)
  455. Best combination after 3960000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0602 versus 0.0607 (1%)
  456. Best combination after 3970016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0602 versus 0.0608 (1%)
  457. Best combination after 3980000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0603 versus 0.0609 (1%)
  458. Best combination after 3990016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0604 versus 0.0610 (1%)
  459. Best combination after 4000000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0604 versus 0.0610 (1%)
  460. Best combination after 4010016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0606 versus 0.0611 (1%)
  461. Best combination after 4020000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0605 versus 0.0611 (1%)
  462. Best combination after 4030016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0606 versus 0.0612 (1%)
  463. Best combination after 4040000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0608 versus 0.0613 (1%)
  464. Best combination after 4050016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0611 versus 0.0616 (1%)
  465. Best combination after 4060000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0613 versus 0.0617 (1%)
  466. Best combination after 4070016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0614 versus 0.0618 (1%)
  467. Best combination after 4080000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0616 versus 0.0620 (1%)
  468. Best combination after 4090016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0616 versus 0.0621 (1%)
  469. Best combination after 4100000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0618 versus 0.0623 (1%)
  470. Best combination after 4110016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0621 versus 0.0625 (1%)
  471. Best combination after 4120000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0623 versus 0.0627 (1%)
  472. Best combination after 4130016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0625 versus 0.0629 (1%)
  473. Best combination after 4140000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0626 versus 0.0629 (0%)
  474. Best combination after 4150016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0629 versus 0.0631 (0%)
  475. Best combination after 4160000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0630 versus 0.0633 (0%)
  476. Best combination after 4170016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0631 versus 0.0634 (0%)
  477. Best combination after 4180000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0631 versus 0.0634 (1%)
  478. Best combination after 4190016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0631 versus 0.0634 (1%)
  479. Best combination after 4200000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0631 versus 0.0635 (1%)
  480. Best combination after 4210016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0632 versus 0.0636 (1%)
  481. Best combination after 4220000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0632 versus 0.0637 (1%)
  482. Best combination after 4230016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0633 versus 0.0637 (1%)
  483. Best combination after 4240000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0636 versus 0.0639 (1%)
  484. Best combination after 4250016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0636 versus 0.0639 (1%)
  485. Best combination after 4260000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0637 versus 0.0640 (1%)
  486. Best combination after 4270016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0639 versus 0.0642 (1%)
  487. Best combination after 4280000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0639 versus 0.0642 (1%)
  488. Best combination after 4290016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0639 versus 0.0643 (1%)
  489. Best combination after 4300000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0638 versus 0.0641 (1%)
  490. Best combination after 4310016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0637 versus 0.0640 (1%)
  491. Best combination after 4320000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0636 versus 0.0639 (0%)
  492. Best combination after 4330016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0635 versus 0.0638 (0%)
  493. Best combination after 4340000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0634 versus 0.0637 (1%)
  494. Best combination after 4350016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0632 versus 0.0636 (1%)
  495. Best combination after 4360000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0631 versus 0.0635 (1%)
  496. Best combination after 4370016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0630 versus 0.0634 (1%)
  497. Best combination after 4380000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0629 versus 0.0633 (1%)
  498. Best combination after 4390016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0628 versus 0.0631 (1%)
  499. Best combination after 4400000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0627 versus 0.0631 (1%)
  500. Best combination after 4410016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0626 versus 0.0629 (1%)
  501. Best combination after 4420000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0625 versus 0.0628 (1%)
  502. Best combination after 4430016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0624 versus 0.0627 (1%)
  503. Best combination after 4440000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0622 versus 0.0626 (1%)
  504. Best combination after 4450016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0621 versus 0.0624 (1%)
  505. Best combination after 4460000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0620 versus 0.0623 (1%)
  506. Best combination after 4470016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0619 versus 0.0622 (1%)
  507. Best combination after 4480000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0618 versus 0.0622 (1%)
  508. Best combination after 4490016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0619 versus 0.0622 (1%)
  509. Best combination after 4500000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0619 versus 0.0622 (1%)
  510. Best combination after 4510016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0619 versus 0.0622 (0%)
  511. Best combination after 4520000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0619 versus 0.0622 (0%)
  512. Best combination after 4530016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0619 versus 0.0622 (0%)
  513. Best combination after 4540000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0618 versus 0.0621 (0%)
  514. Best combination after 4550016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0618 versus 0.0621 (0%)
  515. Best combination after 4560000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0618 versus 0.0621 (0%)
  516. Best combination after 4570016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0618 versus 0.0621 (0%)
  517. Best combination after 4580000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0618 versus 0.0620 (0%)
  518. Best combination after 4590016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0617 versus 0.0619 (0%)
  519. Best combination after 4600000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0615 versus 0.0618 (0%)
  520. Best combination after 4610016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0615 versus 0.0617 (0%)
  521. Best combination after 4620000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0614 versus 0.0616 (0%)
  522. Best combination after 4630016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0613 versus 0.0615 (0%)
  523. Best combination after 4640000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0612 versus 0.0614 (0%)
  524. Best combination after 4650016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0611 versus 0.0613 (0%)
  525. Best combination after 4660000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0610 versus 0.0612 (0%)
  526. Best combination after 4670016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0609 versus 0.0611 (0%)
  527. Best combination after 4680000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0608 versus 0.0610 (0%)
  528. Best combination after 4690016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0607 versus 0.0609 (0%)
  529. Best combination after 4700000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0606 versus 0.0608 (0%)
  530. Best combination after 4710016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0605 versus 0.0606 (0%)
  531. Best combination after 4720000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0604 versus 0.0606 (0%)
  532. Best combination after 4730016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0610 versus 0.0612 (0%)
  533. Best combination after 4740000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0616 versus 0.0618 (0%)
  534. Best combination after 4750016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0621 versus 0.0624 (0%)
  535. Best combination after 4760000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0627 versus 0.0630 (0%)
  536. Best combination after 4770016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0632 versus 0.0635 (0%)
  537. Best combination after 4780000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0638 versus 0.0641 (0%)
  538. Best combination after 4790016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0645 versus 0.0647 (0%)
  539. Best combination after 4800000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0651 versus 0.0653 (0%)
  540. Best combination after 4810016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0657 versus 0.0660 (0%)
  541. Best combination after 4820000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0663 versus 0.0666 (0%)
  542. Best combination after 4830016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0669 versus 0.0671 (0%)
  543. Best combination after 4840000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0675 versus 0.0677 (0%)
  544. Best combination after 4850016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0681 versus 0.0684 (0%)
  545. Best combination after 4860000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0687 versus 0.0690 (0%)
  546. Best combination after 4870016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0693 versus 0.0695 (0%)
  547. Best combination after 4880000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0698 versus 0.0701 (0%)
  548. Best combination after 4890016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0703 versus 0.0706 (0%)
  549. Best combination after 4900000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0709 versus 0.0712 (0%)
  550. Best combination after 4910016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0715 versus 0.0717 (0%)
  551. Best combination after 4920000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0721 versus 0.0723 (0%)
  552. Best combination after 4930016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0726 versus 0.0728 (0%)
  553. Best combination after 4940000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0732 versus 0.0735 (0%)
  554. Best combination after 4950016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0739 versus 0.0741 (0%)
  555. Best combination after 4960000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0745 versus 0.0747 (0%)
  556. Best combination after 4970016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0750 versus 0.0752 (0%)
  557. Best combination after 4980000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0755 versus 0.0757 (0%)
  558. Best combination after 4990016 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0761 versus 0.0763 (0%)
  559. Best combination found after 5000000 sectors: (0,3,1,2-128-left-asymmetric) with entropy 0.0766 versus 0.0768 (0%)
  560. Applying...
  561. -------------
  562. Raid settings
  563. -------------
  564. Raid level 5
  565. 4 drives
  566. Drive 1: DISK0:
  567. Drive 2: DISK5:
  568. Drive 3: DISK1:
  569. Drive 4: DISK2:
  570. Partition start: 256
  571. Partition length: 4,980,480 sectors (2.37 GB)
  572. Volume length: 4,980,352 sectors (2.37 GB)
  573. 1 data drives are required
  574. Stripe count: 0
  575. Stripe size: 128 sectors
  576. Rotation: left-asymmetric
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!