10 Lesta Nediam LNC2017-09-05 1425 +Brian Hill

Lesta Nediam LNC2017-09-05 1425 +Brian Hill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VYGRa4q9ds&lc=z223vbi5su2gsjev4acdp4301waoliq3grubq5zjjs1w03c010c
https://pastebin.com/FcGjxvbL
__

+Brian Hill __ Hurray! So do you finally understand what the "fallacy of the conspiracy theorist" is all about?



__________
2017-09-06 0150

+Brian Hill __ LOL sure it was. You have _never_ in the past two years thought an event was probably staged because the evidence for it had been withheld or obscured. Uh huh.

This has _always_ been common sense to you - even before I began pointing it out more than two and a half years ago - yeah? Uh huh.

You have _always_ been wise to that lie system ploy haven't you? Sure, sure. *So there's a history of you posting videos and comments explaining the pitfalls of this fallacy to your peers who have fallen for it?*

Or is it such "common sense" that you didn't feel it ever needed to be spoken or written? Or acknowledged - _until now?_ LOL your jealousy is intense.

*Tell me - Mr Hill - did you think the "Melbourne Car Attack of 2017" was a real or staged event?*



__________
2017-09-06 1030

+Brian Hill __ *You are such a dishonest little sh!t worm!* Of course "conspiracy theorists" contest events _despite_ the presentation of "sufficient proof". For example - the *"Times Square Car Massacre of 2017"* contained "sufficient proof" for the event happening *yet that didn't stop a sh!t worm like you from talking about it as staged.*

When someone is presented with "sufficient proof" for an event and they reject it they are being unreasonable. *You are an unreasonable little sh!t worm, Mr Hill.*

The "fallacy of the conspiracy theorist" is definitely common sense *once it is brought to one's attention* but there is no proof it ever occurred to you in a meaningful way until just recently - _perhaps just now_ - even though I have been talking about it for years. *You are such a liar and revisionist.* No wonder you find solace in other liars and revisionists.

I also note that you keep avoiding my question in an effort to control the conversation. *Did you think the "Melbourne Car Attack of 2017" was a genuine event or staged?* Stop avoiding the question you wriggly little sh!t worm.




__________
2017-09-06 1525

+Brian Hill __ *YOU* wrote that "conspiracy theorists" do not contest events that contain "sufficient proof" else the term "conspiracy theorist" would not need to have been invented. I then pointed out that *YOU* are a "conspiracy theorist" who disputes the "Times Square Car Massacre of 2017" even though "sufficient proof" for that event exists. You are such a wriggly little sh!t worm.



____________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ

Lesta on Twitter
https://twitter.com/lestanediam

Lesta on Google Plus
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.