Mid Lane Is Literally The Prisoners Dillemma

Reminder that Mid Lane Is Literally The Prisoners Dillemma

Reminder the Nash Equilibrium proves you should defect (take mid) rather than cooperate (let your random subhuman peruvian teammate take Mid)

Reminder Further :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law

It's insultingly obvious how these two apply to the 10 player, 5v5, 1 person per mid lane on each side, game of dota, so i won't even insult your intelligence to spell it out.

FURTHER REMINDER : IN CASE ANYONE ON D2G ATTEMPTS TO TRICK YOU INTO GIVING UP MID.

---

>Yes goy, support me, rely on others to win.
>Do not take solo mid.
>Do not take snowball carry.
>Don't even think of taking those ancients
>Do NOT make your own destiny.
>Do as you are told, I know better.

THIS MAN IS THE ENEMY
HE WANTS TO DENY YOU YOUR GOD GIVEN AUTONOMY IN DOTA
YOUR DOTATONOMY

HE WANTS YOU TO NOT BE ABLE TO DECIDE YOUR OWN FATE
HE WANTS TO DECIDE IT FOR YOU.

DOES YOUR GAME OF DOTA2 BELONG TO YOU? DO YOU DECIDE IF YOU WIN OR LOSE? OR DO YOU PUT YOUR FATE IN THE HANDS OF ANOTHER MAN?

WOULD YOU BE SO SUBSERVIANT TO OTHERS?
WOULD YOU THROW YOUR INDEPENDENCE OUT LIKE YESTERDAY'S GARBAGE?

I DON'T THINK SO.

THAT'S NOT AMERICA.
THAT'S NOT EVEN MEXICO.


IS A DOTATARD NOT ENTITLED TO THE SWEAT OF HIS OWN APM?

NO SAYS THE MAN IN MID, IT BELONGS TO THE LANE CONTROLLER.

NO SAYS THE MAN TAKING THE ANCIENT STACK, IT BELONGS TO THE FARM MASTER

NO SAYS THE MAN BUILDING DAGON, IT BELONGS TO THE KDR MASTER

I REJECTED THOSE ANSWERS; INSTEAD I CHOSE SOMETHING DIFFERENT; I CHOOSE TO PLAY DOTA LIKE A MAN

I CHOSE : MAINING SOLO MID SNOWBALL CARRY

von "Also sprach Zarajuistra : Ein buch für Mid und Carry" - "On becoming Der Übermid"