PC gmolly/ticklefinger

<@gmolly> it's the attempt to suppress language - usually political- typically from the left political side
<+ticklefinger> ...F. Kennedy
<@gmolly> started and flourishes in academia - strange yes? - and of course from there has infected the political arena - and all life by now
<+ticklefinger> what are you trying to say, gmolly?
<@gmolly> it's the direct assault on freedom of public speech by people in a free society where the gov't is restrained from punishing dissidents
<@gmolly> i've said it - clearly - what is PC?
<+ticklefinger> how is it beiong imposed on you, as an individual?
<@gmolly> i floundered - but now i see it clearly - it IS the attempt to suppress language/thought in the private sphere - since gov't is not allowsed to openly curb speech of dissidents
<@gmolly> if i went to college they'd punish me for using certain words, making some comments
<@gmolly> arguments
<@gmolly> if i worked for another i'd be punished for same - even legal act5ions like contributing to a legal political cause
<+ticklefinger> if I work as a cashier, I can't refer to customers as "niggers" or ""spics" - is this something that needs to end?
<@gmolly> it's not that at all
<@gmolly> it's not common decency, it's not at all common sense
<+ticklefinger> so let's be clear
<@gmolly> it's deliberate and anti-liberl fascist control of private speech in public
<@gmolly> yes it should end
<+ticklefinger> what exactly do you object to? what words?
<@gmolly> let peoplt talk - and talk back - don't punish them - get them fired, attack their characters, try to STOP them from talking in public because YOU don't like what they say
<@gmolly> nono - YOU address the very clear definitio
<+ticklefinger> rather than just rage, be specific
<@gmolly> sexual harrassment is so vague a crime - i just don't know - i dont' know what it means, and i'm not prepared to 'accept' the PC system of punishment for it
<@gmolly> i don't know what it is - how bad it is
<@gmolly> specific - eich the Firefox guy was punished through his associations/job for contrituting to a legal and very popular political cause
<@gmolly> this is pc in action - punishing for speech
<@gmolly> for anti-leftist ideology speech
<+ticklefinger> erffbdhbfdsh: I'm trying to get her to be SPECIFIC
<@gmolly> the chikfilet guy was also punished - for merely speaking
<@gmolly> for merely speaking
<@gmolly> i think this is TWICE specific
<@gmolly> the speech of eich and chikfilet was ALL that was punished for
<+ticklefinger> what was he punished for?
<@gmolly> this is PC
<+ticklefinger> what did he say?
<@gmolly> chikfilet said he believed in traditiaon marriage
<@gmolly> that's what he said
<+ticklefinger> who did he say it to?
<@gmolly> eich 'said' the same by donating to the california proposition defining marriage as 1 m/1 w
<@gmolly> does itmatter?
<@gmolly> this is my point - it shouldn't matter
<+ticklefinger> if I( tell my boss that I believe in anal sex, and I get fired, is that another form of this?
<@gmolly> WE have the right to share our ideas INPUBLIC without being punished for it - as we don't allow the GTOVT to punish/censor our speech
<@gmolly> pc is an abuse of the private arena to DO what we don't allow the tgov't to do - CENSOR speech that is our RIGHT
* erffbdhbfdsh is now known as katherine_uk
<+ticklefinger> in the workplace, we have to adhere to professionalism - wouldn't you agree?
<@gmolly> tickle so you think it was right to punish eich et al for merely disagreeing with you in public?
<@gmolly> no in the workplace - in private
<@gmolly> ff isn't a gov't agency is it?
<@gmolly> a 'political' agency is it?
<+ticklefinger> gmolly: you don't believe in an expectation of professionalism in the workplace?
<@gmolly> and the owner of chikfilet - he can't share his personal views in an interview?
<+ticklefinger> katherine_uk: iot appears so
<@gmolly> this is pc - it's vicious antiliberal bullying to CRUSH the speech of peole who disagree with leftism
<@gmolly> how is it unprofessional to donate privately to a political cause???
<@gmolly> is THAT 'u9nprofessional'???
<@gmolly> where?how?
<@gmolly> tell
<+ticklefinger> gmolly: you don't believe in an expectation of professionalism in the workplace?
<@gmolly> to ro SHARE on'e politics in public - other than yours?
<@gmolly> how is chikfilet UNPROFESSIONAL in having an interview and saring his ideas???
<@gmolly> HOW it eithe unprofessional?
<@gmolly> and - it's NOT in the workplace - for either
<@gmolly> is it?
<+ticklefinger> gmolly: do you believe that making sexual advances is a form of free speech in the workplace?
<@gmolly> how is that to do with either oF MY SPECIFIC EXAMPLES?
<@gmolly> you demand specifics - i GIVE them - and you dismiss
<+ticklefinger> gmolly: you haven't cited the exchange
<@gmolly> i'm out - your methods and agenda are cleaar, if disreputable
<+ticklefinger> you haven't been specific
<@gmolly> how are either 'unprofessional' ticklefinger?
* +Krishna (~Ice@124-169-164-66.dyn.iinet.net.au) Quit (Quit: If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you)
<@gmolly> you could answser a question couldn't you?
<@gmolly> no - hta'ts not the leftist way - your was is only and always to be on the offense - dismissing every single answer/response - diverting, sneering, distorting
<@gmolly> i'm done, you do it yourself i'm not playing anymore
<+ticklefinger> I can cite the law, of what is defined as "an expectation of professionalism" in the workplace
<@gmolly> do it
<@gmolly> i'll still play lol
<@gmolly> do it
<@gmolly> ciet the law of expect of profess - and SHOW HOW it applies in any way to MY TZWO SPECIFIC EXAMPLES of pc
 <@gmolly> ok - i'm not going to read that - distill it for irc and THEN connect it to my two specific examples of pc
<@gmolly> or - skip it - all ACCEPT expect of pro'ism in the work - SHOW HOW either of my examples is UNprofessional
<@gmolly> go ahead
<@gmolly> i'll ACCEPT your basis for believing eich and echikfila should've been punished for the speech/donation
<@gmolly> address MY specificsz you demanded i give!
* ED209 sets mode: +v SLAYER66
<+SLAYER66> hello
<@gmolly> address MINE ticklefinger
<@gmolly> you can't - you won't
<@gmolly> ok
<+ticklefinger> I'm pointing to the Roger Ailes incident
* X sets mode: +l 32
<@gmolly> of cours e- you CAN'T Address MY examples you demanded SPECIFICS from me
<+ticklefinger> You haven't given the actual exchange in your example
<@gmolly> i give them - and you do the leftist snot dance - ignore
<@gmolly> so what?
<@gmolly> have you?
<@gmolly> 'actual exchange' what???
<+ticklefinger> The Ailes care is well-documented
<@gmolly> this is a clear example of the bad-faith of the leftist debator
<+SLAYER66> ticklefinger- whatis yr point?
<+ticklefinger> katherine_uk: correct
<+mime> It is important to know that some females can be really bitchy.
<@gmolly> did kuk call me a pos again? or a fucking bigot again?
<+ticklefinger> SLAYER66: "expectation of professionalism" in the workplace ISN'T politically correct, and it isn't censorship
<@gmolly> is tha what ticklefinger cheers as 'correct'?
<+SLAYER66> ticklefiner- wtf is 'expectation of professionalism'?
<+thymos^> gmolly, you apparently have a fucked up piece of shit of a mind
<@gmolly> trying to crush freedom of speech through private means is ugly - uglier than openly trying to abuse gov't power to do it
<+mime> +katherine_uk But no.. in gmolly's fucked up piece of shit of a mind, he is the victim.
<+ticklefinger> SLAYER66: I cited it
<+thymos^> lol
<@gmolly> we SEE the gov't and stop it - but we haven't SEEN the vicious ANTIliberalism of the private PC assault on freedom of speech
<+SLAYER66> ticklefinger- it must have been before i came here