REFERENCES
1. Jimbow K, Quevedo WC, Prota G, Fitzpatrick TB. Biology of melanocytes. In: Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, et al., eds. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine. 5th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1999:192-200.
2. Szabó G, Gerald AB, Pathak MA, et al. Racial differences in the fate of melanosomes in human epidermis. Nature. 1969;222:1081.
3. Milburn PB, Silver DN, Sian CS. The color of the skin of the palms and soles as a possible clue to the pathogenesis of acral-lentiginous melanoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 1982;4:429.
4. Smith G, Kollias N, Wallo W. Estimating the ability of melanin to protect skin of color from UV exposure. Program and abstracts of the 64th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology; March 3–7, 2006; San Francisco, CA.
5. Stamatas GN, Kollias N. Blood stasis contributions to the perception of skin pigmentation. J Biomed Opt. 2004;9:315.
6. Fitzpatrick TB. Soleil et peau. J Med Esthet. 1975;2:33.
7. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practi- cality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988; 124:869.
8. Rampen FH, Fleuren BA, de Boo TM, et al. Unreliability of self-reported burning tendency and tanning ability. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:885.
9. Youn JI, Oh JK, Kim BK, et al. Relationship between skin phototype and MED in Korean, brown skin. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 1997;13:208.
10. Park SB, Suh DH, Youn JI. Reliability of self-assessment in determining skin phototype for Korean brown skin. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 1998;14:160.
11. Stanford DG, Georgouras KE, Sullivan EA, et al. Skin phototyping in Asian Australians. Aust J Dermatol. 1996; 37: S36.
12. Venkataram MN, Haitham AA. Correlating skin phototype and mini- mum erythema dose in Arab skin. Int J Dermatol. 2003;42:191.
13. Satoh Y, Kawada A. Action spectrum for melanin pigmentation to ultraviolet light, and Japanese skin typing. In: Fitzpatrick TB, Toda K, eds. Brown Melanoderma: Biology and Disease of Epidermal Pigmentation. Tokyo, Japan: University of Tokyo Press; 1986:87-95.
14. Kawada A. UVB-induced erythema, delayed tanning, and UVA-induced immediate tanning in Japanese skin. Photodermatol. 1986;3:327.
15. Pathak MA, Fanselow DL. Photobiology of melanin pigmentation: dose/response of skin to sunlight and its contents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1983;9:724.
16. Taylor SC, Arsonnaud S, Czernielewski J, et al. The Taylor Hyperpigmentation Scale: a new visual assessment tool for the evaluation of skin color and pig- mentation. Cutis. 2005;76:270.
17. Wolbarsht ML, Urbach F. The Lancer Ethnicity Scale. Lasers Surg Med. 1999; 25:105.
18. Baumann L. The Skin Type Solution. New York, NY: Bantam Dell; 2006.
19. Thomson ML. Relative efficiency of pigment and horny layer thickness in protecting the skin of Europeans and Africans against solar ultraviolet radia- tion. J Physiol. 1955;127:236.
20. Freeman RG, Cockerell EG, Armstrong J, et al. Sunlight as a factor influencing the thickness of epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 1962;39:295.
COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE
21. Mitchell R. The skin of the Australian Aborigines: a light and electron micro- scopical study. Australas J Dermatol. 1968;9:314.
22. Weigand DA, Haygood C, Gaylor JR. Cell layers and density of Negro and Caucasian stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol. 1974;62:563.
23. Montagna W, Carlisle K. The architec- ture of black and white facial skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;24:929.
24. Reed JT, Ghadially R, Elias PM. Effect of race gender, and skin type of epidermal permeability barrier function [abstract]. J Invest Dermatol. 1994;102:537.
25. Rienertson RP, Wheatley VR. Studies on the chemical composition of human epidermal lipids. J Invest Dermatol. 1959; 32:49.
26. La Ruche G, Cesarini JP. Histology and physiology of black skin. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1992;119:567.
27. Sugino K, Imokawa G, Maibach H. Ethnic difference of stratum corneum lipid in relation to stratum corneum function [abstract]. J Invest Dermatol. 1993;100:597.
28. Harding CR, Moore AE, Rogers JS, et al. Dandruff: a condition characterized by decreased levels of intercellular lipids in scalp stratum corneum and impaired barrier function. Arch Dermatol Res. 2002;294:221.
29. Wilson D, Berardesca E, Maibach HI. In vitro transepidermal water loss: differ- ences between black and white human skin. Br J Dermatol. 1988;199:647.
30. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Racial differ- ences in sodium lauryl sulphate induced cutaneous irritation: black and white. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;18:65.
31. Kompaore F, Marly JP, Dupont C. In vivo evaluation of the stratum corneum barrier function in blacks, Caucasians, and Asians with two noninvasive meth- ods. Skin Pharmacol. 1993;6:200.
32. Berardesca E, Pirot F, Singh M, et al. Differences in stratum corneum pH gra- dient when comparing white Caucasian and black African-American skin. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139:855.
33. Reed JT, Ghadially R, Elias PM. Skin type, but neither race nor gender, influence epidermal permeability bar- rier function. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131: 1134.
34. Berardesca E, de Rigal J, Leveque JL, et al. In vivo biophysical characteriza- tion of skin physiological differences in races. Dermatologica. 1991;182:89.
35. DeLuca R, Balestrier A, Dinle Y. Measurement of cutaneous evapora- tion. 6. Cutaneous water loss in the people of Somalia. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1983;59:1499.
36. Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Agner T, et al. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. Contact Dermatitis. 1990;22:164.
37. Grimes P, Edison BL, Green BA, et al. Evaluation of inherent differences between African American and white skin surface properties using subjective and objective measures. Cutis. 2004; 73:392.
38. Warrier AG, Kligman AM, Harper RA, et al. A comparison of black and white skin using noninvasive methods. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1996;47:229.
39. Wesley NO, Maibach HI. Racial (ethnic) differences in skin properties: the objec- tive data. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4:843.
40. Aramaki J, Kawana S, Effendy I, et al. Differences of skin irritation between Japanese and European women. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146:1052.
41. Goh CL, Chia SE. Skin irritability to sodium lauryl sulphate–as measured by skin water vapour loss–by sex and race. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1988;13:16.
42. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Sodium- lauryl-sulphate-induced cutaneous irri- tation. Comparison of white and Hispanic subjects. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;18:136.
43. Rougier A, Lotte C, Corcuff P, et al. Relationship between skin permeability and corneocyte size according to anatomic site, age, and sex in man. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1988;39:15.
44. Corcuff P, Lotte C, Rougier A, et al. Racial differences in corneocytes. A comparison between black, white and oriental skin. Acta Dermatol Venereol. 1991;71:146.
45. Manuskiatti W, Schwindt DA, Maibach HI. Influence of age, anatomic site and race on skin roughness and scaliness. Dermatology. 1998;196:401.
46. Johnson LC, Corah NL. Racial differ- ences in skin resistance. Science. 1962;139:766.
47. Wickrema-Sinha WJ, Shaw SR, Weber OJ. Percutaneous absorption and excre- tion of tritium-labeled diflorasone diac- etate: a new topical corticosteroid in the rat, monkey and man. J Invest Dermatol. 1978;7:372.
48. Wedig JH, Maibach HI. Percutaneous penetration of dipyrithione in men: effect of skin color (race). J Am Acad Dermatol. 1981;5:433.
49. Lotte C, Wester RC, Rougier A, et al. Racial differences in the in vivo percuta- neous absorption of some organic com- pounds: a comparison between black, Caucasian and Asian subjects. Arch Dermatol Res. 1993;284:456.
50. Stoughton RB. Bioassay methods for measuring percutaneous absorption. In: Montagna W, Stoughton RB, van Scott EJ, eds. Pharmacology of the Skin. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1969:542-544.
51. Guy RH, Tur E, Bjerke S, et al. Are there age and racial differences to methyl nicotinate-induced vasodilatation in human skin? J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;12:1001.
52. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Cutaneous reactive hyperemia: racial differences induced by corticoid application. Br J Dermatol. 1989;129:787.
53. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Racial differ- ences in pharmacodynamic responses to nicotinates in vivo in human skin: black and white. Arch Derm Venereol. 1990;70:63.
54. Gean CJ, Tur E, Maibach HI, et al. Cutaneous responses to topical methyl bicofinate in black, oriental and cau- casian subjects. Arch Dermatol Res. 1989;281:95.
55. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Effect of race on percutaneous penetration of nicoti- nates in human skin: a comparison of white and Hispanic-Americans. Bioeng Skin. 1988;4:31.
56. Marshall EK, Lynch V, Smith HV. Variation in susceptibility of the skin to dichlorethylsulphide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1919;12:291.
57. Weigand DA, Mershon GE. The cuta- neous irritant reaction to agent O- chlorobenzylidene malonitrile (CS). Quantitation and racial influence in human subjects. Edgewood Arsenal Technical Report 4332, February 1970.
58. Weigand DA, Gaylor JR. Irritant reac- tion in Negro and Caucasian skin. South Med J. 1974;67:548.
59. Taylor SC. Skin of color: biology, struc- ture, function, and implications for der- matologic disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:S41.
60. Frosch P, Kligman AM. A method for appraising the stinging capacity of topi- cally applied substances. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1981;28:197.
61. Grove GL, Soschin DM, Kligman AM. Adverse subjective reactions to topical agents. In: Drill VA, Lazar P, eds. Cutaneous Toxicology. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1984:200-210.
62. Berardesca E, Maibach H. Ethnic skin: overview of structure and function. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:S139.
63. Kligman AM, Epstein W. Updating the maximization test for identifying contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 1975;1:231.
64. Fisher AA. Contact dermatitis in black patients. Cutis. 1977;20:303.
65. DeLeo VA, Taylor SC, Belsito DV. The effect of race and ethnicity on patch test results. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:S107.
66. North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Epidemiology of contact der- matitis in North America. Arch Dermatol. 1973;108:537.
67. Sueki H, Whitaker-Menezes D, Kligman AM. Structural diversity of mast cell granules in black and white skin. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144:85.
68. Reilly DM, Ferdinando D, Johnston C, et al. The epidermal nerve fibre net- work: characterization of nerve fibres in human skin by confocal microscopy and assessment of racial variations. Br J Dermatol. 1997;137:163.
69. Toda K, Pathak MA, Parrish JA, et al. Alteration of racial differences in melanosome distribution in human epi- dermis after exposure to ultraviolet light. Nat New Biol. 1972;236:143.
70. Olson RL, Gaylor J, Everett MA. Skin color, melanin, and erythema. Arch Dermatol. 1973;108:541.
71. Smit NP, Kolb RM, Lentjes EG, et al. Variations in melanin formation by cultured melanocytes from different skin types. Arch Dermatol Res. 1998; 290:342.
72. Goldschmidt H, Raymond JZ. Quantitative analysis of skin color from melanin content of superficial skin cells. J Forensic Sci. 1972;17:124.
73. Herzberg AJ, Dinehart SM. Chronologic aging in black skin. Am J Dermatopathol. 1989;11:319.
74. Babiarz-Magee L, Chen N, Seiberg M, et al. The expression and activation of protease-activated receptor-2 correlate with skin color. Pigment Cell Res. 2004;17:241.
75. Whitmore SE, Sago NJ. Caliper- measured skin thickness is similar in
117
CHAPTER 14 ■ SKIN OF COLOR
118
white and black women. J Am Acad
Dermatol. 2000;42:76.
76. Kaidbey KH, Agin PP, Sayre RM, et al.
Photoprotection by melanin–a compari- son of black and Caucasian skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1979;1:249.
77. Rijken F, Bruijnzeel PL, van Weelden H, et al. Responses of black and white skin to solar-simulating radiation: differ- ences in DNA photodamage, infiltrating neutrophils, proteolytic enzymes induced, keratinocyte activation, and IL-10 expression. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;122:1448.
78. Abe T, Arai S, Mimura K, et al. Studies of physiological factors affecting skin sus- ceptibility to ultraviolet light irradiation and irritants. J Dermatol. 1983;10:531.
79. Tadokoro T, Yamaguchi Y, Batzer J, et al. Mechanisms of skin tanning in dif- ferent racial/ethnic groups in response to ultraviolet radiation. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;124:1326.
80. Roh K, Kim D, Ha S, et al. Pigmentation in Koreans: study of the differences from Caucasians in age, gender and sea- sonal variations. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144:94.
81. Kotrajaras R, Kligman AM. The effect of topical tretinoin on photodamaged facial skin: the Thai experience. Br J Dermatol. 1993;129:302.
82. Nagashima H, Hanada K, Hashimoto I. Correlation of skin phototype with facial wrinkle formation. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 1999;15:2.
83. Nouveau-Richard S, Yang Z, Mac-Mary S, et al. Skin ageing: a comparison between Chinese and European popula- tions. A pilot study. J Dermatol Sci. 2005;40:187.
84. Tsukahara K, Fujimura T, Yoshida Y, et al. Comparison of age-related changes in wrinkling and sagging of the skin in
Caucasian females and in Japanese
females. J Cosmet Sci. 2004;55:351.
85. Harris MO. The aging face in patients of color: minimally invasive surgical facial rejuvenation-a targeted approach.
Dermatol Ther. 2004;17:206.
86. Robinson S, Dill DB, Wilson JW, et al.
Adaptation of white men and Negroes to prolonged work in humid heat. Am J Trop Med. 1941;21:261.
87. McCance RA, Purohit G. Ethnic differ- ences in response to the sweat glands to pilocarpine. Nature. 1969;221:378.
88. Herrmann F, Prose PH, Sulzberger WB. Studies on sweating v. studies of quan- tity and distribution of thermogenic sweat delivery to the skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1952;18:71.
89. Rebel G, Kirk D. Patterns of eccrine sweating in the human axilla. In: Montagna W, Ellis R, Silver A, eds. Advances in Biology of Skin. Vol 3. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 1962:108- 126.
90. Homma H. On apocrine sweat glands in white and negro men and women. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1956;38:365.
91. James CL, Worlana J, Stern JA. Skin potential and vasomotor responsiveness of black and white children. Psychophysiology. 1976;13:523.
92. Juniper K Jr, Dykman RA. Skin resis- tance, sweat-gland counts, salivary flow, and gastric secretion: age, race, and sex differences, and intercorrela- tions. Psychophysiology. 1967;4:216.
93. Schiefferdecker P. Dsaael be (vollkomin. Mitt.). Zoologica. 1922;27:1.
94. Hurley HJ, Shelley WB. The physiology and pharmacology of the apocrine sweat gland. In: The Human Apocrine Sweat Gland in Health and Disease. Springfield, IL: Charles Thompson; 1960:64.
95. Champion RH, Gillman T, Rood AS, et al. An Introduction to the Biology of the Skin. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis; 1970:418.
96. Kligman AM, Shelley WB. An investiga- tion of the biology of the sebaceous gland. J Invest Dermatol. 1958;30:99.
97. Pochi P, Strauss JS. Sebaceous gland activity in black skin. Dermatol Clin. 1988;6:349.
98. Abedeen SK, Gonzalez M, Judodihardjo H, et al. Racial variation in sebum excre- tion rate. Program and abstracts of the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology; March 10–15, 2000; San Francisco, CA. Abstract 559.
99. Hardy D, Baden HP. Biochemical varia- tion of hair keratins in man and non- human primates. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1973;39:19.
100. Menkart J, Wolfram L, Mao I. Caucasian hair, Negro hair and wool: similarities and differences. J Soc Cosmetic Chemists. 1966;17:769.
101. Gold RJM, Schriver CH. The amino acid composition of hair from different racial origins. Clin Chem Acta. 1971;33:465.
102. Mangelsdorf S, Otberg N, Maibach HI, et al. Ethnic variation in vellus hair folli- cle size and distribution. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2006;19:159.
103. Halder RM. Hair and scalp disorders in blacks. Cutis. 1983;32:378.
104. Vernall DG. Study of the size and shape of hair from four races of men. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1961;19:345.
105. Khumalo NP, Doe PT, Dawber PR, et al. What is normal black African hair? A light and scanning electron- microscopic study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:814.
106. Sperling LC. Hair density in African Americans. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135: 656.