Pastebin launched a little side project called VERYVIRAL.com, check it out ;-) Want more features on Pastebin? Sign Up, it's FREE!
Guest

Untitled

By: a guest on Feb 21st, 2014  |  syntax: None  |  size: 3.78 KB  |  views: 7,680  |  expires: Never
download  |  raw  |  embed  |  report abuse  |  print
Text below is selected. Please press Ctrl+C to copy to your clipboard. (⌘+C on Mac)
  1. gmaxwell: wumpus: yea, I understand they had timed automatic reissues... :( this was also something I didn't know prior to monday before last and is one of the other reasons my "they couldn't have lost much!" position softened to "I have no freeking clue."
  2. RBRubicon left the room (quit: Quit: quit.....).
  3. epscy: the figure I keep hearing is 250,000 btc (that's roughly what they should have, customer funds + plus profit from trading fees), no idea if that is reliable or not though
  4. qupop left the room (quit: Ping timeout: 245 seconds).
  5. dreni83 left the room (quit: Remote host closed the connection).
  6. epscy: mrkent: there are a lot of assumptions floating about though, which makes me uneasy
  7. cesurasean1: where do most people get their bitcoins here? finding them themselves?
  8. gmaxwell: epscy: well if you want to do detective work, someone pointed out that there was a HUGE bitcoin days destroyed spike on the 7th.
  9. gmaxwell: might be interesting to go find the contributing transaction(s).
  10. dreni83 [~dreni83@195-67-21-42.customer.telia.com] entered the room.
  11. epscy: gmaxwell: you think that could have been gox?
  12. alpha125: gmaxwell: where did you find out abotu the automatic reissues?
  13. dreni83 left the room.
  14. CloudsDew__ left the room (quit: Read error: Operation timed out).
  15. mrkent: gmaxwell, where did u buy goxBTC?
  16. buttnaked [~buttnaked@bl14-161-100.dsl.telepac.pt] entered the room.
  17. gmaxwell: mrkent: from people on irc, they're in #mtgox-otc now.
  18. gmaxwell: alpha125: from mtgox staff and magicaltux ... I had assumed previously that any reissues were manual via customer support but apparently it was just timed.
  19. epscy: oh jeez
  20. paxos2k_ is now known as paxos2k
  21. newy left the room (quit: Quit: Leaving.).
  22. alpha125: damn. that makes me change my mind quite a bit
  23. epscy: said it before and will say it again, endlessly retrying txes hoping the problem goes away is not what i want from an exchange
  24. alpha125: :(
  25. gmaxwell: you'll also note that they've kept increasing their fees and then even mad paying fees mandatory.
  26. epscy: i actually approve of what gox is doing now, shutting things down until the problem is fixed (though communication is poor)
  27. gmaxwell: This suggested to me that they totally misunderstood their problems. (and— I reported that I believed this months ago too)
  28. epscy: i think they should probably shut off trading as well
  29. fatal1 left the room (quit: Quit: fatal1).
  30. SwampTon_ [~swamptony@58.251.146.164] entered the room.
  31. eBook left the room (quit: Ping timeout: 260 seconds).
  32. gmaxwell: e.g. they noticed lots of txn getting stuck, they didn't understand it was because they were producing invalid txn (even though it was reported to them) and so they thought it was just 'full blocks'
  33. alpha125: epscy: but them being able to buy cheap coins might be their way out of this mess
  34. mrkent: gmaxwell, Ah yes. I was shocked when logging into gox for the first time in a long time to see 0.001 fee
  35. rokj: well they need just to keep money, btc flowing in, nothing to go out
  36. Morkel [~Morkel@208.100.46.74] entered the room.
  37. gmaxwell: and they increased their fees from 0.0001 to 0.0005 — which was enough to may more than virtually every txn— and then later to 0.001 which is basically astronomic. And then they made it mandatory.
  38. epscy: alpha125: they have always claimed they don't trade on their own exchange
  39. goxcon [62a4e7ec@gateway/web/freenode/ip.98.164.231.236] entered the room.
  40. Persopolis: from a totally uneducated view point - it feels like mtgox are stalling intentionally - their reputation is already damaged and they lose nothing by further delays - are they trying to get some form of agreement that enables them to recover some of their lost funds?
  41. epscy: alpha125: and i really think it would be a bad thing if they did
  42. gmaxwell: of course their stalled txn had nothing to do with fees.