Guest User

valgrid output pilight

a guest
Sep 28th, 2013
161
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 5.26 KB | None | 0 0
  1. disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF26EE1FE
  2. cond=15(0xF) 27:20=38(0x26) 4:4=1 3:0=14(0xE)
  3. ==2976== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x49435e0.
  4. ==2976== at 0x49435E0: ??? (in /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
  5. ==2976== Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
  6. ==2976== did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
  7. ==2976== 1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
  8. ==2976== location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
  9. ==2976== warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
  10. ==2976== 2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
  11. ==2976== i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
  12. ==2976== you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
  13. ==2976== Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
  14. ==2976== probably kill your program.
  15. disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xEE190F1D
  16. cond=14(0xE) 27:20=225(0xE1) 4:4=1 3:0=13(0xD)
  17. ==2976== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x49435e8.
  18. ==2976== at 0x49435E8: ??? (in /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
  19. ==2976== Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
  20. ==2976== did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
  21. ==2976== 1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
  22. ==2976== location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
  23. ==2976== warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
  24. ==2976== 2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
  25. ==2976== i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
  26. ==2976== you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
  27. ==2976== Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
  28. ==2976== probably kill your program.
  29. ==2951== Thread 7:
  30. ==2951== Invalid read of size 4
  31. ==2951== at 0x4974144: fclose@@GLIBC_2.4 (iofclose.c:57)
  32. ==2951== by 0xAA9F: call_process_file (daemon.c:172)
  33. ==2951== by 0x48FDBFB: start_thread (pthread_create.c:306)
  34. ==2951== by 0x49E0757: ??? (clone.S:116)
  35. ==2951== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
  36. ==2951==
  37. pi@raspberrypi ~/pilight.dev $ disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200
  38. cond=15(0xF) 27:20=16(0x10) 4:4=0 3:0=0(0x0)
  39. ==2976== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x4843638.
  40. ==2976== at 0x4843638: ??? (in /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libcofi_rpi.so)
  41. ==2976== Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
  42. ==2976== did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
  43. ==2976== 1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
  44. ==2976== location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
  45. ==2976== warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
  46. ==2976== 2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
  47. ==2976== i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
  48. ==2976== you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
  49. ==2976== Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
  50. ==2976== probably kill your program.
  51. ==2976==
  52. ==2976== Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
  53. ==2976== Illegal opcode at address 0x4843638
  54. ==2976== at 0x4843638: ??? (in /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libcofi_rpi.so)
  55. ==2976==
  56. ==2976== HEAP SUMMARY:
  57. ==2976== in use at exit: 1,327,221 bytes in 272 blocks
  58. ==2976== total heap usage: 303 allocs, 31 frees, 1,331,069 bytes allocated
  59. ==2976==
  60. ==2976== LEAK SUMMARY:
  61. ==2976== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
  62. ==2976== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
  63. ==2976== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
  64. ==2976== still reachable: 1,327,221 bytes in 272 blocks
  65. ==2976== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
  66. ==2976== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
  67. ==2976== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes
  68. ==2976==
  69. ==2976== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
  70. ==2976== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 67 from 8)
  71. Illegal instruction
  72. ==2971==
  73. ==2971== HEAP SUMMARY:
  74. ==2971== in use at exit: 478 bytes in 23 blocks
  75. ==2971== total heap usage: 25 allocs, 2 frees, 538 bytes allocated
  76. ==2971==
  77. ==2971== LEAK SUMMARY:
  78. ==2971== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
  79. ==2971== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
  80. ==2971== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
  81. ==2971== still reachable: 478 bytes in 23 blocks
  82. ==2971== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
  83. ==2971== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
  84. ==2971== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes
  85. ==2971==
  86. ==2971== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
  87. ==2971== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 13 from 6)
  88. ==2991== Memcheck, a memory error detector
  89. ==2991== Copyright (C) 2002-2011, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
  90. ==2991== Using Valgrind-3.7.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
  91. ==2991== Command: /home/pi/scripts/pilight-event.php {"origin":"sender","protocol":"archtech_switches","code":{"id":8934706,"unit":3,"state":"off"}}
  92. ==2991==
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment