Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF26EE1FE
- cond=15(0xF) 27:20=38(0x26) 4:4=1 3:0=14(0xE)
- ==2976== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x49435e0.
- ==2976== at 0x49435E0: ??? (in /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
- ==2976== Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
- ==2976== did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
- ==2976== 1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
- ==2976== location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
- ==2976== warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
- ==2976== 2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
- ==2976== i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
- ==2976== you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
- ==2976== Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
- ==2976== probably kill your program.
- disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xEE190F1D
- cond=14(0xE) 27:20=225(0xE1) 4:4=1 3:0=13(0xD)
- ==2976== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x49435e8.
- ==2976== at 0x49435E8: ??? (in /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libcrypto.so.1.0.0)
- ==2976== Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
- ==2976== did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
- ==2976== 1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
- ==2976== location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
- ==2976== warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
- ==2976== 2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
- ==2976== i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
- ==2976== you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
- ==2976== Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
- ==2976== probably kill your program.
- ==2951== Thread 7:
- ==2951== Invalid read of size 4
- ==2951== at 0x4974144: fclose@@GLIBC_2.4 (iofclose.c:57)
- ==2951== by 0xAA9F: call_process_file (daemon.c:172)
- ==2951== by 0x48FDBFB: start_thread (pthread_create.c:306)
- ==2951== by 0x49E0757: ??? (clone.S:116)
- ==2951== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
- ==2951==
- pi@raspberrypi ~/pilight.dev $ disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xF1010200
- cond=15(0xF) 27:20=16(0x10) 4:4=0 3:0=0(0x0)
- ==2976== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x4843638.
- ==2976== at 0x4843638: ??? (in /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libcofi_rpi.so)
- ==2976== Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
- ==2976== did not recognise. There are two possible reasons for this.
- ==2976== 1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
- ==2976== location. If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
- ==2976== warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
- ==2976== 2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
- ==2976== i.e. it's Valgrind's fault. If you think this is the case or
- ==2976== you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
- ==2976== Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
- ==2976== probably kill your program.
- ==2976==
- ==2976== Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
- ==2976== Illegal opcode at address 0x4843638
- ==2976== at 0x4843638: ??? (in /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libcofi_rpi.so)
- ==2976==
- ==2976== HEAP SUMMARY:
- ==2976== in use at exit: 1,327,221 bytes in 272 blocks
- ==2976== total heap usage: 303 allocs, 31 frees, 1,331,069 bytes allocated
- ==2976==
- ==2976== LEAK SUMMARY:
- ==2976== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- ==2976== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- ==2976== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- ==2976== still reachable: 1,327,221 bytes in 272 blocks
- ==2976== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- ==2976== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
- ==2976== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes
- ==2976==
- ==2976== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
- ==2976== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 67 from 8)
- Illegal instruction
- ==2971==
- ==2971== HEAP SUMMARY:
- ==2971== in use at exit: 478 bytes in 23 blocks
- ==2971== total heap usage: 25 allocs, 2 frees, 538 bytes allocated
- ==2971==
- ==2971== LEAK SUMMARY:
- ==2971== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- ==2971== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- ==2971== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- ==2971== still reachable: 478 bytes in 23 blocks
- ==2971== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
- ==2971== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
- ==2971== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes
- ==2971==
- ==2971== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
- ==2971== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 13 from 6)
- ==2991== Memcheck, a memory error detector
- ==2991== Copyright (C) 2002-2011, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
- ==2991== Using Valgrind-3.7.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
- ==2991== Command: /home/pi/scripts/pilight-event.php {"origin":"sender","protocol":"archtech_switches","code":{"id":8934706,"unit":3,"state":"off"}}
- ==2991==
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment