10:12:57  <Tiger>	Can someone elaborate this? "Before there is a rush of "You banned for youtube comments??" we banned them for promoting malware linked to zandronum,"
10:13:46  <Tiger>	Sounds like businesses checking over their employee's facebook messages, but that can't be right for this case
(...)
10:19:54  <someoneelse>	when your employee is drinking weed and attends orgies, he is still not destroying someone's property in your name
(...)
10:20:17  <Tiger>	Re-reading it, it seems that I stand corrected.  I'll be sure to not have anything "Zandronum" in any of my posts outside of this entire community :\ ....
10:20:40  <Tiger>	Eh
10:20:52  * SyKoTiC posts how great zandronum to promote and make popular
10:20:54  <SyKoTiC>	= banned
10:21:00  <SyKoTiC>	that what you mean? lol
10:21:07  <Tiger>	No.
10:21:17  <someoneelse>	yes, because destroying someones thing that costs MONEY is the same as chatting
(...)
10:22:49  <Tiger>	This statement seems rather over-zealous:   "Before there is a rush of "You banned for youtube comments??" we banned them for promoting malware linked to zandronum, if you don't believe us feel free to download it at your own risk. Hope it was worth it for you all."
10:23:34  <someoneelse>	it is lost proportions
10:23:39  <someoneelse>	zandro is just a game
10:24:05  <someoneelse>	you can't get people lose their valuable property because they may had wanted to cheat IN A GAME.
10:24:56  <Tiger>	To me, this really seems to be the case: <Tiger> Sounds like businesses checking over their employee's facebook messages, but that can't be right for this case
10:25:10  <someoneelse>	yes, I noticed, you like to quote yourself
10:25:46  <someoneelse>	and when I answer a sentence you wrote you quote the other sentence
10:25:59  <someoneelse>	and in this way writing two sentences always makes you right :D