8 Lesta Nediam LNC2017-07-29 1305 +Olivia Anderson

Lesta Nediam LNC2017-07-29 1305 +Olivia Anderson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-mo_P9DkuA&lc=z12yc3gbppf0evne523tfb2yhxejsb5vv
https://pastebin.com/CXw20nqM
__

+Olivia Anderson __ There are good reasons to be skeptical so please hear me out. Do you really think that a person who is as *profoundly disabled* as "Stephen Hawking" can honestly keep up with his field to comment meaningfully on it?

How long has it been since "Stephen Hawking" was able to scribble a thought down on paper? The way we are told he communicates is *ridiculously slow*. It doesn't matter how intelligent a person is if what they are supposed to be doing is *physically impossible*.

Rather than think of "Stephen Hawking" as an "alien" or a "robot" as some conspiracy theorists allege - don't you think it's *far more likely* that "Stephen Hawking" is instead benefiting from a "ghost writer"?

Wouldn't that make a lot of sense?

How certain are you that *all* of the words from "Stephen Hawking" are *entirely* his own? If they aren't *all* his own words *then that is something the public ought to know about!*

Please get back to me with your thoughts.



__________
2017-08-01 1915

+Jen Line __ Yes - while some may erroneously imagine that "Stephen Hawking" communicates in "real time" his responses are necessarily written in advance due to his profound disability. The genuine skepticism surrounding "Stephen Hawking" has more to do whether anyone that severely restricted is able to stay on top of current events in order to provide meaningful commentary let alone a complicated scientific field like theoretical physics.

It cannot be disputed that if anyone were to benefit from a "ghost writer" it would be "Stephen Hawking" (i.e., other people who are authorised to write responses to interview questions in his name to save time). How can we be satisfied that the opinions "Stephen Hawking" gives during interviews are truly his own?

Have you or anyone else from the public actually seen "Stephen Hawking" demonstrate the technology he uses to compose sentences? No doubt the technology works but it may not be nearly as quick as most imagine. Perhaps that is why we have not seen a demonstration of it (not even from an able-bodied person).



____________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ

Lesta on Twitter
https://twitter.com/lestanediam

Lesta on Google Plus
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.