API tools faq
paste
Advertisement
Lesta

32 Lesta Nediam LNC2017-07-12 0425 +Freddie Sparks

Lesta
Jul 11th, 2017
135
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 6.79 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2017-07-12 0425 +Freddie Sparks
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-AFyYCS5rM&lc=z123ujcaxtyfvbfg004cj1qrwym0idzwjtg0k
  3. https://pastebin.com/BuFFdyEy
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Freddie Sparks __ In 2017 there exist countless images of the Moon that have "realness" to them but the lie system *still* has not provided us with a picture of the Earth from space with an equivalent "realness".
  7.  
  8. Without a genuine photo that exudes "realism" (and is thus distinguishable from CGI/artwork) the population is *forced to trust* that the "Earth from space" pictures have been taken honestly - that they really are true and accurate visual representations of reality as it really is.
  9.  
  10. If you ask a "normal person" why the images of Earth from space look so "fake" (lack "realism") they will tell you it's because the camera used was old. Or because the images are "composites". Or because the "scientists" aren't concerned with snapping "normal photos" - they're too busy doing important "science" and so the images are "scientific images".
  11.  
  12. These are "plausible explanations" that satisfy most "normal people". Should any doubt arise in the mind of a "normal person" it will get suppressed by these "plausible explanations".
  13.  
  14. But there are those who are not satisfied by these _excuses._ Such people have *lost trust in the lie system* but do not have a correct understanding of the lie system. And because they do not properly understand how the lie system works they can be expected to commit the _"fallacy of the conspiracy theorist"_.
  15.  
  16. The conspiracy theorist concludes we have no photos of the Earth from space that exude realism because "no one has gotten far enough away to take such a photo" or because "the Earth is flat".
  17.  
  18. The fallacy of the conspiracy theorist is rooted in the mistake that: *"If a person claims X and has the means to prove X - _and there is no good reason why they haven't proved X_ - then they must be lying about X".*
  19.  
  20. For example: during the alleged "Melbourne Car Attack" there *must* exist CCTV footage of the car running people down. CCTV cameras were all along where the car is alleged to have driven. We also know that CCTV footage of people getting run down (intentionally) gets shown on the nightly news - so there is no good reason why we haven't at least seen *something* of the car on Bourke Street.
  21.  
  22. (This reply can only cover the basics otherwise I'd need to write 20+ pages.)
  23.  
  24. Since that footage should exist - and there is no good reason for not showing at least something of it - the conspiracy theorist concludes that the event did not really happen. It must have been staged. The conspiracy theorist reasons: _"If it had been real then we would have at least seen something of the car travelling down Bourke Street but we didn't."_
  25.  
  26. With the images of Earth from space that always resemble CGI/artwork the conspiracy theorist concludes:
  27.  
  28. 1) We are shown CGI/artwork because no one has gotten far enough away.
  29.  
  30. 2) We are shown CGI/artwork because the Earth is flat.
  31.  
  32. Both of these conclusions are rooted in the idea of "if a photo that exudes realism could be taken then it would be shown - since it hasn't the claim must be false".
  33.  
  34. But since it is alleged that people have walked on the Moon - such a photo really ought to exist by now. All we need is just *one* photo that exudes realism and it would silence all of the conspiracy theorists!
  35.  
  36. Since a photo exuding realism doesn't exist the conspiracy theorist who doesn't have a correct understanding of the lie system cannot think of any other explanation. At least not of an explanation where such an image *would exist* but is being intentionally withheld from the population.
  37.  
  38. (I.e., it does not seem to occur to conspiracy theorists that a photo exuding realism could exist but simply isn't being shown. After all - you mentioned that we could still be shown real images and have our realities distorted. I will address that directly in a moment.)
  39.  
  40. But that is precisely it. A photo of the Earth from space that exudes realism would constitute *"sufficient proof"* (of the Earth's shape and of the ability to be that far enough away from the Earth) and the lie system - _where possible and as much as possible_ - withholds, cripples and obscures "sufficient proof".
  41.  
  42. By presenting the truth in this manner the population is forced to trust the story tellers and becomes rendered unable to recognise lies when they are presented as truth _in this same special way._
  43.  
  44. In a nutshell that is how the lie system works. This can be readily observed for yourself. It is what we can predict would happen - and it sure seems to be the case. (I.e., since no one in the population is ever going to get far enough away from the Earth to take a photo of the entirety of its shape exuding realism - the lie system doesn't *have* to. Again - there are nuances and I can only be brief with this reply.)
  45.  
  46. >> But there is something *more* going on with the supposed photos of Earth from space. <<
  47.  
  48. This gets to the heart of the matter. Not only does providing "artwork" instead of "realism" conform to censoring/crippling/obscuring "sufficient proof" it does something else that's important.
  49.  
  50. By placing an *artificial image* of the Earth into your mind *as a child* - it has *forever* distorted your perception of reality.
  51.  
  52. Generally speaking - "Nature" cannot lie and as children something *fake* was slipped into our mind as something *real*. (At a time when we naturally trusted the adults around us - without any hesitation nor any ability to doubt or question what was happening - the artwork went into our mind as real. "Nature" does not lie!)
  53.  
  54. This simple act *fractured our mind* and created a category in our mind for "fake things perceived as real". This opened the door for more fake things to be perceived as real. When it comes to those things we are powerless to see them as anything other than real.
  55.  
  56. This has made each of us vulnerable to accepting more and more fake things that are perceived and treated as real.
  57.  
  58. *The images of Earth from space are important because they draw attention to this "fracturing" that took place in all of us as children.* Each of us has a "piece of artwork" in our minds that has been locked in as "reality".
  59.  
  60. (Not only does the artwork demonstrate the point about "sufficient proof" but it also shows this perceptual manipulation.)
  61.  
  62. This is the basic idea. It's just one of many things that makes us more susceptible to the lie system's voodoo.
  63.  
  64.  
  65. ____________________________________________________________
  66. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  67.  
  68. Lesta on YouTube
  69. https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ
  70.  
  71. Lesta on Twitter
  72. https://twitter.com/lestanediam
  73.  
  74. Lesta on Google Plus
  75. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  76.  
  77. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  78. What exists - exists to always exist.
  79. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
Public Pastes
Advertisement
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!