Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Chat
- Guest_CrazyBob668 has joined the chat
- Guest_CrazyBob668: what's your mood today?
- Zer0bandit: Stable. Small blessings, eh?
- Guest_CrazyBob668: small blessings?
- Zer0bandit: indeed. One needs to remain thankful for the little things.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: ok
- Guest_CrazyBob668: not like last time?
- Zer0bandit: Last time?
- Guest_CrazyBob668: yes
- Guest_CrazyBob668: you were kinda rude
- Guest_CrazyBob668: with presumptions
- Zer0bandit: I didn't see it as a presumption, so much as an effort to not waste your time.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: i saw it as a presumption
- Zer0bandit: that's a shame.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: while I've explained several times what my business on here is
- Guest_CrazyBob668: not really
- Zer0bandit: you do have a habit of choosing to get upset at the things I say.
- Zer0bandit: One wonders why you still come to say hello.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: reverse:
- Guest_CrazyBob668: You do have a habit of trying to point out flaws on me
- Guest_CrazyBob668: instead of looking for them in yourself
- Zer0bandit: Well, you're the one that keeps coming to me. I have no intention of changing my behaviour.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: non sequitur
- Zer0bandit: Pardon?
- Guest_CrazyBob668: it's latin
- Guest_CrazyBob668: comes from the theories of discussing/debating
- Zer0bandit: Yes, I know what a non-sequiter is, but I don't know why you're suddenly saying it.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: because you just did one
- Guest_CrazyBob668: And I don't accept it since it's non sequitur
- Zer0bandit: Hardly. I made a comment on your behaviour. You made a comment saying maybe I should fix mine. I said I have no intention of doing so.
- Zer0bandit: Follows along pretty smoothly, I should think.l
- Guest_CrazyBob668: incorrect repetition
- Guest_CrazyBob668: never stated that you should fix yours
- Guest_CrazyBob668: i stated a suggestion to look within in yourself, instead of continiously trying to point out flaws in mine
- Zer0bandit: Suggestion noted, and dismissed, I suppose.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: so you admit making a false repition now?
- Zer0bandit: Pardon?
- Guest_CrazyBob668: this is not a vocal conversation, you can read what i said over and over
- Zer0bandit: This is a straight question, not a challenge or a trick, but what are you trying to do tonight?
- Zer0bandit: It seems like you're trying to out-clever me, but I can't draw a bead on your eventual goal.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: changing of subject
- Guest_CrazyBob668: my goal was stated at the start of this discussion
- Zer0bandit: Hmm, I just scrolled up to look and I can't see it.
- Zer0bandit: You may need to re-state it.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: the reverse part
- Guest_CrazyBob668: continously, you are trying to point out flaws with me, while you should look at yourself
- Zer0bandit: ahh. So your goal is to get me to look at my own flaws?
- Guest_CrazyBob668: a statement proven emperically with this discussion
- Guest_CrazyBob668: no
- Guest_CrazyBob668: -_-
- Guest_CrazyBob668: sorry, but I used to people who actually listen to what I'm saying
- Zer0bandit: Evidently.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: and don't try to win discussions by using tricks like non sequitar and incorrect repitition
- Zer0bandit: Conversely, I don't often speak at length with people who try and sound clever by conducting a casual interaction like it's a formal debate.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: if this was a formal debate we would have to convince a third person
- Guest_CrazyBob668: so your statement is untrue, again
- Zer0bandit: So at the risk of you trying to deflect it by wailing about non-sequiter
- Zer0bandit: why DO you still start chats with me?
- Zer0bandit: If you find my manner so abhorrent.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: it's not wailing about non sequitur
- Guest_CrazyBob668: that term applies to argumentation
- Guest_CrazyBob668: not a question
- Zer0bandit: So have you actually got an answer to my question?
- Guest_CrazyBob668: off course
- Guest_CrazyBob668: but first importance to me was pointing out the error you made regarding non sequitur
- Guest_CrazyBob668: and i believe in giving people chances
- Guest_CrazyBob668: second even third
- Guest_CrazyBob668: to bad you ran out
- Zer0bandit: Still waiting on that answer.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: to what question do you claim i haven't answered
- Guest_CrazyBob668: ?
- Zer0bandit: Why. Do. You. Keep. Inviting. Me.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: Guest_CrazyBob668: and i believe in giving people chances
- Guest_CrazyBob668: Guest_CrazyBob668: second even third
- Guest_CrazyBob668: Guest_CrazyBob668: to bad you ran out
- Zer0bandit: It's been a lot more than three times.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: chances =! conversations
- Zer0bandit: well, obviously, if you're here talking to me.
- Zer0bandit: Though that does mean that your previous answer is invalid, because if it was valid, we wouldn't be talking.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: my answer isn't invalid
- Guest_CrazyBob668: it seems a presumption is made that you blew a chance in my book, with every conversation
- Guest_CrazyBob668: or do you disagree on that?
- Zer0bandit: You said 'or even three'. I can think of at least three times when I've been straightforward with you and you've chosen to be offended.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: you can think of that. That's good for you. yet, you can't project those thoughts on me and expect me to share that thought
- Guest_CrazyBob668: falsification through projection
- Zer0bandit: You are a perplexing human. You're telling me I've run out of chances. I'm wondering why you're still here. You're accusing me of exaggerating how many chances I've had- and yet you're the one who has the objections themselves.
- Zer0bandit: Surely you ought to be agreeing with me. Especially if, as you said, I have run out of chances and thus hit your threshold of tolerance.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: i'm still talking here, since this was your last chance
- Guest_CrazyBob668: to that point the statement still stands
- Guest_CrazyBob668: for the rest, well
- Guest_CrazyBob668: it's interesting to see how people debate, like you are just doing
- Zer0bandit: I'm glad it's interesting for you, at least.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: and just identify every 'trick' you try
- Guest_CrazyBob668: it tells me a lot about you
- Guest_CrazyBob668: which brings me back to the starting statement
- Guest_CrazyBob668: finding flaws in others, while i suggest finding them in yourselves
- Zer0bandit: Nah, I'm good.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: *yourself
- Zer0bandit: It's intriguing that you feel you need to help improve me as a person, and that, even having reached your threshold of tolerance, you're still interested enough to want to study my behaviour.
- Zer0bandit: I wonder if you're more attached than I thought you were.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: it seems you will have to wonder then
- Zer0bandit: I don't imagine it will bother me for long after this chat ends.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: and i don't need to HELP you improve
- Guest_CrazyBob668: again a presumption
- Zer0bandit: One more passing acquaintance in the sea of IMVU.
- Guest_CrazyBob668: i rather assist people who aren't so ignorant or aren't open to even consider flaws
- Zer0bandit: Uh huh.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement