Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Re: [alpha] Trapwire on Kabul Hotel Attack
- Released on 2012-08-09 18:00 GMT
- Email-ID 83883
- Date 2011-06-29 16:16:29
- From burton@stratfor.com
- To sean.noonan@stratfor.com, alpha@stratfor.com
- List-Name alpha@stratfor.com
- Checking
- Does GOOGLE earth have a picture of the stand off and/or gates?
- We may be able to count 'em.
- On 6/29/2011 9:14 AM, Sean Noonan wrote:
- This makes sense, they don't know anymore than we do on the targetting.
- But the other thing is to compare their capabilities with available
- targets. They may simply have not thought they could exploit a
- vulnerability at the Serena, so chose the next most high profile
- target.
- Did not see this before I sent out last Insight questions, but I had
- seen this earlier insight-
- Stormed in force out of a vehicle after one perp detonated a vest at the
- gate. (That's preliminary -- not confirmed yet).
- Can we confirm that? Once they got to the gate, which I assume is
- farther away from the hotel at the bottom of a hill, how did they get
- through the next checkpoints?
- On 6/29/11 8:22 AM, Fred Burton wrote:
- Two schools of thought on this at the moment:
- 1. Taliban expected the hotel to be full of westerners attending the
- transition talks. The hotel is used by westerners, but not nearly as
- much as the Serena Hotel downtown. The attackers allegedly
- communicated to their Taliban planners during the operation that they
- were going door-to-door and rounding up "many westerners." Whether or
- not this was Taliban hype, they clearly wanted to give the impression
- they were head-hunting foreigners.
- 2. The Taliban targeted the hotel due to fact that clan/tribal chiefs
- were staying there ahead of the transition talks. (Which is true,
- there were some in the hotel at the time of the attack). This could
- have been the Taliban's attempt to send a mssg that they were still
- strong, and that no decisions on the future of Afghanistan can occur
- without them. In other words, a pure intimidation op.
- Mike, Who do you think the target was? Thanks
- --
- Sean Noonan
- Tactical Analyst
- Office: +1 512-279-9479
- Mobile: +1 512-758-5967
- Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
- www.stratfor.com
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement