API tools faq
paste
Advertisement
Lesta

8 Lesta Nediam LNC2017-04-07 0845 +Robbo Max

Lesta
Apr 6th, 2017
80
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 6.56 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2017-04-07 0845 +Robbo Max
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clbC8Boa2ww&lc=z125hbjo3na3drgqt04cerholoqotryj1cs
  3. https://pastebin.com/AQZLC89y
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Robbo Max __ Do you know what a "literalist" is? It's when someone is so *unreasonably precise* about something that they get *needlessly agitated and fixated* when even the *slightest* of details is off.
  7.  
  8. For example - when you called someone a "sap" you got upset when I said you'd used the term "sap". You got upset because you had more precisely written the word "saps". Even though you were calling him a "sap" and even though everyone understood what was meant - you took exception to it because it wasn't precise.
  9.  
  10. This caused you to respond appallingly with your usual abuse and it's all because you aren't able to accept that "SAP" is covered by "SAPS". Just as "CAR" is covered by "CARS". Just as "TREE" is covered by "TREES".
  11.  
  12. When you take things too literally you get stuck and you can't make meaningful progress. You are stuck and you are not making any meaningful progress. Let's change that.
  13.  
  14. It is obvious that "smoke'n mirrors" omitted some other parts from the interview. For example - he didn't include all of the speaking of the radio interviewer! You chose to overlook the *spirit* of my video because you found an unreasonably *literal* way to reject it. Like you did with the "sap"/"saps" saga.
  15.  
  16. You are being unreasonable because you are desperately trying to White Knight for "smoke'n mirrors" (though I don't see him here trying to stick up for you).
  17.  
  18. What "smoke'n mirrors" did do - and this was the primary claim I made about his video - *is that he left out the part of the interview where "Christine Nixon" has said "hit by the cars".*
  19.  
  20. Now as a "literalist" you should have noticed that too. Why? Because "smoke'n mirrors" included a screenrecording of the "3AW" player showing the timeline being played over when she would have said "hit by the cars".
  21.  
  22. That should upset a "literalist"! "He wasn't playing the same audio as was shown in the player!" - If your "literalism" isn't an act - you should be able to appreciate that what "smoke'n mirrors" did can appear devious to people who are not sure if he can be trusted.
  23.  
  24. You want to chew off my head for not being precise - but you're definitely being *too relaxed and forgiving* with what "smoke'n mirrors" did.
  25.  
  26. I have no doubt that had it all been reversed you would have accused me of dishonesty. You would have accused me of deliberately omitting "hit by the cars" and being sneaky about it because I showed the "3AW" player seeming to play over that portion of the interview.
  27.  
  28. That's what you would have done - though it's unlikely you can admit it. *Everyone can see that you are now being unreasonable.* Any valid objections you may have had have been lost as a result of your unreasonable and combative attitude.
  29.  
  30. *Are you interested in the truth or are you only interested in arguing endlessly about everything else?*
  31.  
  32. Right now you have a decision to make. If you cannot drop your "literalist" attitude and if you can only call me a "liar" who "spreads disinformation" with every reply - then just stop. Go away. It means you are not a serious person. It means you are not a serious researcher. It means you're a sad and lonely truther troll who is wasting everyone's time - _though mostly your own time._
  33.  
  34. I have given you a good chance. I give all new people I talk to a good chance. Can you drop the "literalist" act for just a minute and be reasonable?
  35.  
  36. 1) *Do you claim that nobody died or got hurt during the alleged Melbourne Car Attack?* I have stated my position on this event. I am suggesting that it was a genuine event where real people died and got hurt but that police contributed to at least some of the carnage and it is being covered up by the news media. That is why I suggest the relevant Bourke Street CCTV footage has not being shown (not even a potato cam version of it). However - I am unclear on your position. Please tell me whether you believe people were injured or if they were all so-called "crisis actors". This is not a controversial question. Only a troll would avoid answering it.
  37.  
  38. 2) When did you first become aware that "Christine Nixon" had said "hit by the cars" during her "3AW" radio interview? Was it before "smoke'n mirrors" posted his video on that interview or after my video? This is also not controversial. You know the answer - so just say it. Or is the true answer embarrassing?
  39.  
  40. If anything is unclear - or you need it more precisely worded - just say so and I'll make the effort just for you.
  41.  
  42. Please prove that you are a good, honest, intelligent and reasonable person by taking this reply seriously and proving that you can cooperate - _even with someone you dislike_ - in order to get to the truth of the matter.
  43.  
  44. I don't like you one bit but I am still making an effort with you because getting to the truth of the matter is what's most important. It should be important to you too.
  45.  
  46. Before you reply - think. Think it through. Don't react emotionally. If you answer my questions I will then answer anything you ask me. That's a promise.
  47.  
  48. If you reply with more of the same abuse and more time-wasting garbage then your time with Lesta will have come to an end. You will be thought of as a time-wasting truther troll. And it would be the truth about you.
  49.  
  50. Now prove that you're not a time-wasting truther troll and prove you're the "better man" by answering what has been asked above even though you feel as though there are questions I should be answering first.
  51.  
  52. As I say - answer the above two questions and then ask whatever you want and I'll answer it. If I don't THEN you can be justified in claiming I am diverting attention. But only then.
  53.  
  54.  
  55. ______________________________________________________________
  56. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  57.  
  58. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  59. https://www.youtube.com/c/LestaNediamHQ
  60.  
  61. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  62. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  63.  
  64. Lesta Nediam's Official Blog:
  65. https://lestanediam.blogspot.com
  66.  
  67. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  68. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  69.  
  70. Lesta Nediam's Vimeo
  71. https://vimeo.com/lestanediam
  72.  
  73. Lesta Nediam's Vidme
  74. https://vid.me/LestaNediam
  75.  
  76. Lesta Nediam's Dailymotion
  77. https://www.dailymotion.com/LestaNediam
  78.  
  79. Lesta Nediam's LiveLeak
  80. https://www.liveleak.com/c/LestaNediam
  81.  
  82. Lesta Nediam's Disqus:
  83. https://disqus.com/home/forum/lestanediam/
  84.  
  85. Lesta Nediam's Archived Public Comments:
  86. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  87.  
  88.  
  89. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  90. What exists - exists to always exist.
  91. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
Public Pastes
Advertisement
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!