STILL mad about internet poll

#LINESPQR
22:18:02 < Fleischy> wat
22:18:04 <&Hawkan> ;)
22:18:08 < Fleischy> RoT was not ahead of stormwind before the hacking began
22:18:10 <@rakiru> gg
22:18:14 <@rakiru> Hawkan, ^
22:18:31 <@rakiru> i loled
22:18:46 <@rakiru> hadn't actually properly looked at the thread before, because goat pen
22:21:23 <&Hawkan> x)
22:21:24 -!- Venator_ [Venator@LDRoT-28F3E30A.dynamic.qsc.de] has quit [Quit: Leaving]
22:22:05 <%Spring> Fleischy: your caring is showing
22:22:08 <%Spring> hide it quickly
22:22:08 <%Spring> !!!
22:22:12 < Fleischy> >:(
22:22:16 < Fleischy> im not m-m-maaad
22:22:25 <&Hawkan> haha
22:22:33 <@rakiru> ReubenMcHawk, his sig says UAV, so i'm botting them
22:22:35 <%Spring> you're acting "ironically" about it because as it turns out you kind of are
22:22:52 <&Hawkan> maybe i should crosspost in the creative part rakiru? :P
22:22:57 <@rakiru> Fleischy, they were when i looked
22:22:58 < Fleischy> just correcting a statement that is false in my knowledge
22:23:06 <&Hawkan> derp poetry at its worst
22:23:09 <@rakiru> they were 50/50 the whole time really though
22:23:20 < Fleischy> sw was ahead in polls by several points before rot shot out to 200 or something
22:23:26 <@rakiru> like, one was ahead, then the other, then back again
22:23:30 < Fleischy> then reuben showed us the link
22:23:38 <%Spring> rakiru query pls
22:23:39 < Fleischy> could be
22:23:47 <@rakiru> last time i looked at it before botting, rot was in the lead by 1
22:23:53 < Fleischy> okay
22:27:29 <@rakiru> i know fuck-all about stormwind, but i'd say them and rot probably deserve the win, because they were pretty even and quite far ahead of the rest
22:27:51 <@rakiru> really though, this vote shuld've been done on the forum - it was retarded to use this
22:28:01 <@rakiru> i could easily have made whoever i wanted win without making it obvious

---

23:26:37 <%ReubenMcHawk> 22:22:16 < Fleischy> im not m-m-maaad
23:26:41 <%ReubenMcHawk> nice damage control btw
23:26:42 <%ReubenMcHawk> almost worked
23:26:49 < Fleischy> can you explain what that even is
23:27:24 <%ReubenMcHawk> what damage control is?
23:27:27 < Fleischy> yes
23:27:29 <%ReubenMcHawk> !google damage control
23:27:30 < Fleischy> you keep saying it
23:27:33 < Fleischy> oh thxx
23:27:34 <%ReubenMcHawk> ;google damage control
23:27:38 <%ReubenMcHawk> however that works
23:27:38 < Fleischy> !g damage control
23:27:40 <%ReubenMcHawk> you get it
23:27:42 < Fleischy> ok
23:27:56 <%ReubenMcHawk> "action taken to limit the damaging effects of an accident or error."
23:28:02 -!- Ashoka [webchat@LDRoT-482AF106.fbx.proxad.net] has quit [Quit: Web client closed]
23:28:10 < Fleischy> Examples are:
23:28:10 < Fleischy> rupture of a pipe or hull especially below the waterline and
23:28:10 < Fleischy> damage from grounding (running aground) or hard berthing against a wharf.
23:28:10 < Fleischy> temporary fixing of bomb or explosive damage.
23:28:19 < Fleischy> hmm that is relevant indeed
23:28:28 <%ReubenMcHawk> i.e. what most celebrities wind up doing once they realize they did something damaging to their reputation
23:28:37 <%ReubenMcHawk> Fleischy: you're trying too hard again
23:28:38 < Fleischy> do a stupid giggle or what
23:28:47 < Fleischy> it's just what i found in wiki
23:28:52  * cat giggles
23:29:00 <%ReubenMcHawk> a google for "damage control definition" gave me what i posted
23:29:12 <%ReubenMcHawk> you're just trying to be funny by posting obviously incorrect definitions
23:29:24 < Fleischy> i dont find it funny myself
23:29:36 <%ReubenMcHawk> yeah okay
23:29:51 <@cat> xd
23:30:04 < Fleischy> i wasnt trying to control any damage or anything
23:30:25 <%ReubenMcHawk> you weren't trying enough, at least
23:30:39 < Fleischy> but i dont even understand what youre talking about
23:30:59 <%ReubenMcHawk> 23:27:56 <%ReubenMcHawk> "action taken to limit the damaging effects of an accident or error."
23:30:59 <@cat> :troll!
23:31:24 < Fleischy> what error did I do this time
23:31:33 <%ReubenMcHawk> >cares too hard
23:31:36 <%ReubenMcHawk> >called on it
23:31:40 <%ReubenMcHawk> >"i don't care guys!"
23:31:50 <%ReubenMcHawk> is that simple enough to process
23:32:30 < Fleischy> is trying to correct someone because i think they made a mistake caring?
23:32:58 <%ReubenMcHawk> if the mistake mattered enough to you then yes
23:35:35 <%ReubenMcHawk> http://pastebin.com/AA77GQS1
23:35:41 < Fleischy> not again

#buildandshoot
23:35:49 <+ReubenMcHawk> http://pastebin.com/AA77GQS1
23:35:55 < Fleischy> ok

#Stormwind
23:35:54 <+ReubenMcHawk> http://pastebin.com/AA77GQS1
23:35:55 <@|Pussy|> pastebin.com - "STILL mad about internet poll - Pastebin.com"
23:35:58 <@Fleischy> ok
23:36:03 <@Fleischy> go find more channels
23:36:19 <+ReubenMcHawk> and yet you needed to comment on every channel i posted it in
23:36:28 <@Fleischy> why not
23:36:35 <+ReubenMcHawk> your care is showing
23:36:39 <@Fleischy> wait no just fuck this it will end up another pastebin
23:36:41 <@Fleischy> shhhhhhhhhhhh

#LINESPQR
23:37:37 < Fleischy> so how exactly does one prove to others that he's not mad
23:38:18 < Fleischy> since both refusing and accepting ends up the same
23:38:36 <%ReubenMcHawk> ^not really, it's more that nobody buys the refusing
23:39:23 < Fleischy> so i should just say yes of course im mad thank you for pointing it out
23:40:06 <%ReubenMcHawk> or just not get mad, that could work too
23:41:14 < Fleischy> you can just say  haha Fleischy mad  at any second
23:41:28 < Fleischy> no matter what i say
23:41:51 < Fleischy> even when im not insulting anyone/thing, simply being in an argument
23:42:30 <%ReubenMcHawk> yes i could
23:42:36 <%ReubenMcHawk> my hands can type anything at any time
23:42:52 <%ReubenMcHawk> but yet somehow nobody else cares to disagree when i call you on being mad
23:44:10 < Fleischy> yes
23:44:32 < Fleischy> because they like seeing me try to deny it
23:44:44 <%ReubenMcHawk> because it's hilarious