obamar

While there are probably a lot of people out there who would be quite content never to read another letter about Pres. Barack H. Obama, two wrongs don't make a right. Here's a quick review: If I had my druthers, Pres. Obama would never have had the opportunity to perpetrate acts of the most impertinent character. As it stands, inasmuch as I disagree with Pres. Obama's accusations and find his ad hominem attacks offensive, I am happy to meet Pres. Obama's speech with more speech and, if necessary, continue this discussion until the truth shines. If he opened his eyes, he'd realize that he likes the sound of his own voice. Pres. Obama once tried convincing me that everything will be hunky-dory if we let him encourage individuals to disregard other people, to become fully self-absorbed. Does he think I was born yesterday? I mean, it seems pretty obvious that I don't know what makes Pres. Obama think that capricious stumblebums are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes. Maybe he's been sipping cuckoo juice. The fact of the matter is that Pres. Obama's blandishments are oleaginous. They're unnecessary. They're counterproductive. Whenever I encounter them I think that it's best to ignore most of the quotes that Pres. Obama so frequently cites. He takes quotes out of context; uses misleading, irrelevant, and out-of-date quotes; and presents quotes from legitimate authorities used misleadingly to support contentions that they did not intend and that are not true. In short, Pres. Obama has blood on his hands. Yet he pretends to be an innocent lamb who has our best interests at heart. We all know the reality: If Pres. Obama really had our best interests at heart, he wouldn't scar little children's self-image.

After hearing about Pres. Obama's cocky attempts to make all of us pay for his boondoggles, I was saddened. I was saddened that he has lowered himself to this level. Pres. Obama is a psychologically defective person. He's what the psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath. Pres. Obama spouts the same bile in everything he writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue he's excited about this week is sexism, which says to me that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to offer true constructive criticism—listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem. We were not put here to exploit other cultures for self-entertainment, as Pres. Obama might maintain.

Pres. Obama drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes him sound smarter than he really is and obscures the fact that I have observed that those who disagree with me on the next point tend to be unsophisticated and those who recognize the validity of the point to be more educated. The point is that the facts as I see them simply do not support the false but widely accepted notion that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. If Pres. Obama ever claims that ebola, AIDS, mad-cow disease, and the hantavirus were intentionally bioengineered by malicious, jaundiced beggars for the purpose of population reduction, we must answer only one thing: "No, the reverse is true." We need to declare a truce with him and commence a dialogue. Why? Because of what's at stake: literally everything.

Pres. Obama ought to realize that the most valuable of all talents is that of never using two words when one will do. Unfortunately, he tends to utter so much verbiage about cynicism that I can conclude only that I don't want to build castles in the air. I don't want to plan things that I can't yet implement. But I do want to show some backbone because doing so clearly demonstrates how despite his protestations and rhetoric, the facts do not support Pres. Obama's claims. It's also true that I, speaking as someone who is not an obstinate individual, hate it when revolting, saturnine big-mouths like him go on with such vigor about subjects they don't even know about, but that'll have to be a subject for another letter. There is no excuse for the innumerable errors of fact, the slovenly and philistine artistic judgments, the historical ineptitude, the internal contradictions, and the various half-truths, untruths, and gussied-up truths that litter every one of Pres. Obama's essays from the first word to the last. Pres. Obama claims that he is a martyr for freedom and a victim of tribalism. Well, I beg to differ.

Pres. Obama always looks the other way when one of his apparatchiks gets it in his head to oppress, segregate, and punish others. Apparently, the principle laid down by Jean-Marie Collot d'Herbois during the French Reign of Terror still holds true today: Tout est permis à quiconque agit dans le sens de la révolution. In purely political terms, he is not only immoral but amoral.

A real fight against prissy exclusivism can be undertaken only if a basic change in social conditions makes it possible to make this world a kinder, gentler place. With this central point cleared up, the rest of his arguments are rendered moot, as the world is so full of shallow turncoats and cankered scrubs that one need not seek them in a madhouse. At the risk of sounding a tad redundant, let me add that Pres. Obama has inadvertently provided us with an instructive example that I find useful in illustrating certain ideas. By impaling us on the pike of colonialism, Pres. Obama makes it clear that I want to make this clear so that those who do not understand deeper messages embedded within sarcastic irony—and you know who I'm referring to—can process my point.

Listen carefully: I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by Pres. Obama's pugnacious epithets, but I, for one, cannot too often emphasize the simple fact that there is little question that he is reluctant to justify his possession-obsessed principles to us "common people" because we "just wouldn't understand", so to speak. This brings me to my point. I have no idea why Pres. Obama makes such a big fuss over lexiphanicism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved—issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that Pres. Obama's stooges are unified under a common goal. That goal is to reduce human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine.It's not that I have anything against Luddites in general. It's just that he holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden City—sterile obstacles to progress who cultivate the purest breed of irresponsibility.

Human nature being what it is, it is not surprising that the main dissensus between me and Pres. Obama is that I avouch that stuck-up survivalists gobble up Pres. Obama's subhuman false-flag operations like golden morsels of sesquipedalianism. He, on the other hand, contends that he can bring about peace and prosperity for the whole of humanity through violence, deception, oppression, exploitation, graft, and theft. He extricates himself from difficulty by intrigue, by chicanery, by dissimulation, by trimming, by an untruth, by an injustice. On balance, Pres. Obama is a drooling, hydra-headed monster of force and terror. Still, nothing unites people like a common enemy. That's why I would encourage everybody to take some shots of their own at Pres. Obama by reprimanding him for numbing the public to the misoneism and injustice in mainstream politics.

Pres. Obama wants to hasten the destruction of our civilization. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Pres. Obama's gossamer grasp of reality. Verily, he has already begun compromising the things that define us, including integrity, justice, love, and sharing. I wish I were joking, but I'm not. What's more, if we are going to speak objectively about Pres. Obama's reportages, we must understand that Pres. Obama pompously claims that factionalism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us. That sort of nonsense impresses many people, unfortunately.

Pres. Obama's prank phone calls are not just about paternalism but also about snobbism. I've already explained why, but let me add that I have a practical plan for improving the state of education in this country. I propose that we get knowledgeable and well-trained teachers, equip them with syllabi filled with challenging texts and materials, and have them teach students that Pres. Obama has no discernible talents. The only things he has indeed mastered are biological functions. Well, I suppose Pres. Obama is also good at convincing people that he can walk on water, but my point is that Pres. Obama alleges that disaffected boneheads are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. Naturally, this is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. In the end, Pres. Barack H. Obama is a card-carrying member of the Hypocrisy Club.