\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage{amsmath}

\author{Integral}
\title{Standard LaTeX Document}
\date{\today}

\begin{document}

\maketitle

\section{Introduction}

First 3 paragraphs: what's the question? What is the state of the literature? What do you add?

Next 5 paragraphs: give a summary of your results, still at a high level, and connect it to the literature. Dedicated literature review sections are falling out of favor; integrate the lit review into the introduction.

No mathematics in the introduction. Ever.

Three pages is a good upper limit for the introduction.

Dedola, Karadi, and Lombardo (2013 JME) is an example of a very good introduction.

\section{Model}

Five to ten paragraphs. Be brief about model elements that are ``standard.'' Go into detail on model elements that are new.

If it's a DSGE paper, carefully state the definition of equilibrium and the solution method you use.

Demonstrating LaTeX's math abilities, we have the usual 3-equation New Keynesian model:
\begin{align}
	x_t &= E_t x_{t+1} - \sigma(i_t - E_t\pi_{t+1} - r_t^n) \\
	\pi_t &= \beta E_t \pi_{t+1} + \kappa x_t \\
	i_t &= \delta_{\pi} \pi_t
\end{align}
which hold for $t=1,2,3,\dots$.

\section{Data}

Do not waste time describing well-known datasets. Do describe any new or interesting data. If your paper is motivated by new stylized facts, this is the place to present them. If you're calibrating a model, tell me here what moments you're matching. If you're estimating, tell me everything I need to know about the estimation technique.

If it's an applied micro paper, convince me that your instrument is, indeed, valid.

\section{Results}

Fifteen or so paragraphs. Figure out your three main results and spend five paragraphs on each. Support your claims with tables and figures. Tell me the economic intuition.

\subsection{Result 1}

\subsection{Result 2}

\subsection{Result 3}

\section{Conclusions}

Short and sweet.

\end{document}