Good evening citizens of eWorld,

This is the translation of the Italian article in English

language concerning the causes of Italy's exit from the G7,

which I wrote before the two Referendums. I read different

versions of the story but as you all know, the story is

written by the strongers.
This is the original version of the facts, written by an avid

supporter of G7.
Good read.

[i]Prologue [/i]

You all know me as one who criticizes and scolds anyone and as

a player with his head on his shoulders that doesn't do things

at random but always in order to do te best for the country

and the people making it big;
I write this article from governmental and partner national

security men.
I always respected that great newbie of [citizen]elcid

[/citizen] and I have always trusted his actions. My

confidence, as in all things, has never been blind but I can

tell you that is a reliable player that [b] hasn't received

offers in Gold to leave G7 [/b], as some have said;)

[center][b]The case G7 [/b] [/center]

[i]G7: output causes [/i]

Since my Government I noticed friction within the Alliance

that we were taking part: basically the two most powerful

Countries (Poland and Lithuania) have always had a few clashes

with each other, bickering more than anything else. Other

nations are also deployed a bit from part, a little from the

other.
This brought the two superpowers had more sympathy towards

some, rather than to other "minor" Nations.
In the past month, the Italian Government decided to attack

Slovenia or Croatia: the idea was presented to the G7 HQ so

you can ask any support. [b]The HQ decided [/b] so that he

could attack Italy Slovenia with the support of Hungary, which

would attack the drainandone harm Croatia.
After a few weeks of the war, [b] the Slovenian Government

asked to end the war by proposing a NAP [/b] with which

officially would pay a hundred Gold in Exchange for the region

conquered by Italy (Upper Carniola). Unofficially, Slovenia

paid the 60% in Gold and the remainder in sandwiches, Q5 (666

pieces).
The war ended for us, but it was Hungary to have against

Croatia and Slovenia. Then followed a Serbian attack that

still keeps them engaged.

The war was hard on both sides and very expensive for us,

given that Italy has never recalculated the pack based on the

current value of weapons/food/gift: this entailed, as all

great wars, the creation of yet another [b] debt [/b] with the

[citizen] Banca d Italia [/citizen] (remember that my

goverment cleared the previous debt).
Of course all of you will agree with me that if we want to

fight again, sooner or later we should settle this debt :P
Subsequently, the HQ of G7 began to breathe an air even

heavier than the previous one.

It was the time of France's attack against the occupied

territories from Lithuania. The latter claimed to want to

attack and delete the France, [b] not for interest but to

revenge for the snub immediately [/b]. They said also that

they occupied France for a week and then they left.
Poland was interested in France but the interest was just to

have a possible outlet for further expansion: the French was

not High on his way.
So it was that our Government [b] asked Lithuania and Poland

could occupy the old friend France, in order to increase

revenue and prepare to support G7 again [/b]. Poland and

Lithuania gave the ok.

The Italian Government subsequently agreed with the French.

The HQ G7 blamed by [citizen]elcid [/citizen] taking

previously secret agreements with France behind the Alliance.

[b]Lithuania denied having said that the interest in France

was just to "punish" the latter "[/b].

Our President received an invitation for a meeting in which

[b] G7 would vote for regrading of Italy's Pro-State Member

[/b]. I myself received a private message from [citizen] dr

love [/citizen] (with whom I have excellent relations) in

which I informed that the G7 would vote for regrading of

Italy.
[b]The HQ of the G7 said that "Italy is good only for drainare

damage" [/b]: thus [citizen] elcid [/citizen] made the

decision (already if it was rumored in the Italian Government)

to leave the Alliance: a downgrade would take us to a bondage

situation: a Pro-Member country is not entitled to vote in the

Council, rarely has priority and must always support at their

own expense and without Alliance without the security of being

able to apply for support.


[i]The after days [/i]

Right now, representatives by the G7 asked under what

conditions we could re-enter as full member in G7: This means

they weren't expecting an abandonment but who believed that we

would obey as good pooches ;)
Myself, talking with [citizen] dr love [/citizen] I told him

that [citizen] elcid [/citizen] would never wanted to return

to the G7 after the snub received. In addition to this there

is to say that between the two players is never being good

blood and probably this has affected much of the matter

Currently we receive constant invitations to return to the G7

as well as hearty demand for joining other alliances or form

new ones.

[i]Personal considerations [/i]

Personally, I never had any problems with [citizen] dr love

[/citizen] as mentioned in high esteem and I talked several

times on the issue.
I reckon [citizen] elcid [/citizen] and know for sure that his

actions are well-researched.
I admit, however, that he should have put to vote the exit

from G7, [b] at least among members of Government [/b] since

they were elected with the Government of [citizen] Kirio

[/citizen] and then by the Italian people.

We must however take account of the fact that if any member of

the Government had not considered sane [citizen] elcid

[/citizen] he would required a impeachment ;)
Dialogue with [citizen] dr love [/citizen] I have come to the

conclusion that the Alliance would resume there as full member

(but we should still do what they require for a few months!)

only if [citizen] elcid [/citizen] was ousted from the

Government and from any governmental office.
These days our MU State were set to closed equip due to the

Easter holidays. Today I set the State laws in Hungary support

[b]that always supported us in our battle [/b]. Basically

alliances are bilateral so we can maintain excellent relations

with some of the Nations that make up the various covenants of

the game. Neutrality is a double-edged sword and serves a

government able to handle it.

[b]Finally it must be said, that in fact, the question of HQ

G7 put to the vote was "you downgrade the Italy and promote

Hungary?": obviously this is why Hungary (our supporter) voted

yes. In addition, Indonesia and Turkey (our supporters) were

not present at the vote![/b] This is not correct.

I remain favourable to the return of Italy in G7 but I remind

you that we will not be treated well as before (and already

there weren't fine).



Yours sincerely,
[b][citizen]Damon Mortis [/citizen] [/b]