Supercel CEO Ilkka Paananen told last year of HS in an interview supercel pay taxes in Finland without any form of tax optimization.

"We've received a lot of help from society, and now it is our turn to pay back," Paananen said.

And thus they did last year really did.

The company's founders Mikko Kodisoja paid last year in taxes EUR 54.4 million. Ilkka Paananen, in turn, 54100000.

Both are Finnish records for one year tax payments.

Monday's newspaper Helsingin Sanomat published a list of top taxpayers for tax years 1999-2012. Kodisoja and Paananen increased in recent years through taxation to which top the list as we speak. Both cost a year, almost as much tax as a list of the fourth was the banker Björn Wahlroos 14 years.

Wahlroos paid the tax in 1999-2012 amounted to 52.4 million last year to 3.6, or a total of about 56 million.

Kodisojan and Paananen, in addition to last year, the largest tax-payers' list is full of supercelliläisiä anyway. Three of a Kind is Lassi Leppinen 12.1 million, nelosena Niko Derome 12.0 million and the fifth Visa Forsten 11.9 million.

Supercel CFO Janne Snellman is a list of the seventh 4.4 million. Game Designer Lasse Louhento is ranked 15th after paying a tax of 3.2 million.

The above listed Supercell crowd paid taxes last year, a total of 152.1 million.

The amount is staggering - so big that it already substantially immune to the whole of Finland's tax revenue. The Tax Administration said last week that the capital gains tax rose by a fifth last year, or 375 million of tax compared to 2012. This increase, the Super Cell-Seven, therefore, covered almost half.

Supercel impact on tax revenue increases by the fact that the company had last year, one of the largest corporate tax payers. It is the sixth on the list of Nordea, OP, UPM, Fortum and Bayer after. Supercell paid last year in corporate income tax to EUR 82.3 million.

Multi-criticized annual tax day voyeurism and the envy of journalism celebration of the day.

Supercel case no one should experience negative shiver. The company has been quite an extraordinary success story. Tax planning its founders would choose to have been able to significantly reduce their tax payments. This is how they did not do.

Looks like a fine example, which we can only sincerely admire!