Guest User

rooro

a guest
Jan 31st, 2012
101
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
Latex 1.30 KB | None | 0 0
  1. The following lemma is a variable exponent modification of~\cite[Chapter 4.7.1, Lemma 2(iii)]{EvaG92}.
  2. \begin{lemma} \label{subadd_apulemma}
  3. Let $u_i\in\W(\Rn)$ and define
  4.    \begin{align*}
  5.        & u(x) := \sup\limits_{i} u_i(x) , \\
  6.        & g(x) := \sup\limits_{i} |\nabla u_i(x)|.
  7.    \end{align*}
  8. If $u,g\in\Lp(\Rn)$, then $u\in\W(\Rn)$ and $|\nabla u|\leq g$ almost everywhere.
  9. \end{lemma}
  10.  
  11. \begin{proof}
  12. The variable exponent H{\" o}lder inequality \cite[Lemma 3.2.20]{DieHHR11} implies that $u$ and
  13. $g$ are locally integrable functions.
  14. Let us now recall the proof of \cite[Chapter 4.7.1, Lemma 2(iii)]{EvaG92}. The main tools are the Riesz representation of a functional and the Radon-Nikodym theorem. The methods of applying the Riesz representation and the Radon-Nikodym theorem remain valid also in our case. Even though we work from slightly different function spaces.
  15. Finally, we have that $u$ has the weak gradient $\nabla u$ dominated by $g$. This also completes the statement about $u$ belonging to the desired Sobolev space.
  16. \end{proof}
  17.  
  18. \begin{huomautus}
  19. See also \cite[Lemma 1.28]{BjoB_pp09} for a very short proof of a similar result in the metric measure space setting. In the proof, the supremum of the upper gradients corresponds to the function $g$ in our lemma.
  20. \end{huomautus}
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment