Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- # Moderator
- Is human nature innate?
- # Chomsky
- Tags: /human nature/schematism/language/
- Person knowing a language
- * Exposed to it through experience
- * Data is small relative to amount of knowledge speaker demonstrates
- Languages are limited in how they can appear
- Therefore the individual must contribute the schematic structure & content
- * Child begins with a schematism (instinctive knowledge)
- * This must be part of human nature
- * This must be true for other domains
- ###### Human nature and schematism
- Innate schematisms are human nature
- # Moderator
- For Foucault are there several schematisms?
- # Foucault
- Tags: /human nature/epistemological indicator/
- Distrusts concept of human nature
- Concepts have different degrees of elaboration
- * Peripheral concepts
- * Well-established concepts
- Peripheral concepts
- * Have an organizing role in science
- * Not instruments of analysis
- * Not descriptive either
- * They point out problems, or certain fields in need of study
- * Not a scientific concept
- * 'Epistemological indicator'
- * Index of problems yet to be uncovered
- Biology example
- * Reflex is a well-established concept
- * 17th 18th century, life was hardly used when classifying beings
- * End of 18th century: problem of internal organization of these natural beings
- * Thanks to microsocope new things could be seen
- * Developments in chemistry have highlighted certain problems
- * Connections between chemical reactions & physiological processes
- * So the new field of life appeared for biologists
- * Life pointed out new fields of study
- Can one say the same about human nature?
- Human nature is not a scientific concept
- See [link](#Human nature and schematism)
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement