Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- documentclass [12pt,letterpaper]{exam}
- usepackage{amsmath, amsthm, amsfonts, amssymb, amscd, latexsym}
- usepackage{type1cm}
- usepackage{simplemath}
- oddsidemargin 0.0in
- evensidemargin 0.0in
- textwidth 6.0in
- headheight 0.0in
- topmargin 1.0in
- textheight 8.5in
- header{ECSE-500-01-1}{Assignment 8 Answers}{19.11.2014}
- %begin{math}
- newcounter{count}
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
- begin{document}
- printanswers
- begin{enumerate}
- item If E=$phi$ then it is obvious that a $notin$ E $Rightarrow$ $delta_a$ (E)=0. Now let $ra E_n$ be a sequence
- of subsets of X such that:
- \*n$neq$m$Rightarrow$ $E_n$$cap$$E_m$=$Phi$
- This is not a trivial statement as it also implies that "a" could belong to at most one term of the sequence.
- \*Hence we have:
- begin{enumerate}
- item'a' belongs to a term $E_i$ of the sequence
- item'a' does not belong to any of the terms.
- end{enumerate}
- For (a):
- \* We have a $in$ ${bigcuplimits_{n=1}^infty}$ $E_n$=${bigcuplimits_{n=1 \* nneq i}^infty}$ $E_n$ $cup$ $E_i$$Rightarrow$ $delta_a$(${bigcuplimits_{n=1}^infty}$$E_n$)=1
- \*But,
- \*${sumlimits_{n=1}^infty}$$delta_a$ $(E_n)$=${sumlimits_{n=1 nneq i}^infty}$$delta_a$ $(E_n)$ + $delta_a$ $(E_i)$=1 (Since $delta_a$ $(E_n)$=$forall$ n$neq$ i)
- \*Hence,
- \*$delta_a$(${bigcuplimits_{n=1}^infty}$$E_n)$= ${sumlimits_{n=1}^infty}$ $delta_a$ $(E_n)$\*\*
- For (b):\*
- a $notin$ ${bigcuplimits_{n=1}^infty}$ $E_n$ $Leftrightarrow$a $notin$ $E_n$ $forall$ n $Rightarrow$${bigcuplimits_{n=1}^infty}$$delta_a$($E_n$)
- Thus from the above we conclude that $delta_a$ is a measure on X (the Dirac Measure in a)
- item begin{enumerate}
- item $int_E$f d$mu$ = $int_E$f d$delta_a$
- \*Assuming f is measurable, we know that if a $notin$E then \*
- $delta_a$(E)=0 and thus $int_E$f d$delta_a$=0 \*
- If a$in$E, then we can define the set B={a} and C=E-B \*
- We get, $mu$(e)=$delta_a$(e)=0. Since a$notin$e.
- Also, we have B$subset$E, thus, assuming E$in$m,
- by corollary of theorm 11.2 (lecture 10) we have \*
- $int_E$f d$delta_a$ = $int_a$f d$delta_a$ = f(a) \*
- Thus, we have $int_E$f d
- $
- delta_a =
- begin{cases}
- 0 & text{ if } ain E\
- f(a) & text{ if } anotin E
- end{cases}
- $\*
- item Let E = ${n_1 ... n_k Leftrightarrow$E = ${bigcuplimits_{n=1}^k}$ ${n_k}\*
- Then,\*
- int_E f dmu = {int_{bigcuplimits_{n=1}^k{n}} f dmu_c}=
- {sumlimits_{n=1}^k} {int_{{n}} f dmu_c =
- {sumlimits_{n=1}^k} f(n_i) =
- {sumlimits_{x_iin E}}f(n_i)
- $end{enumerate}
- end{enumerate}
- %end{math}
- end{document}
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement