Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Apr 13th, 2014
21
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 1.25 KB | None | 0 0
  1. questions on the formatting doc- are we really going to number the choices? to me that seems unnecessary and potentially confusing. also, I don't know if we need to put "route start" for relationship points- it's not really a separate route, just checking the points. maybe start it differently, like "check"? that would help keep track of things a little easier. maybe the programmers will have suggestions for formatting nested stuff.
  2.  
  3. [13:03:00] Zekira G. Drake:Hmm. Should we leave it up to the programmers to look for those, then? Or replace it with something more convenient?
  4.  
  5. [13:03:41] Felistar 1701: we can leave it up to them, just wanted to mention it
  6. [13:03:57] Zekira G. Drake:Clarify? I guess 'route' is confusing as a word lol
  7.  
  8. [13:05:05] Zekira G. Drake: And what can we replace this with? I agree that what I cooked up for now looks too technical haha
  9.  
  10. [13:06:43] Felistar 1701: I think that for the relationship point checks, they could be something like "check" or "point check"
  11.  
  12. [13:08:08] Felistar 1701: it's hard because I'm used to the indentation in ren'py for writing scripts, so I don't know the best way to translate all the nested stuff. hope the programmers can help us there.
  13.  
  14. [13:09:30] Zekira G. Drake: Alright, I'll try asking them.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement