Advertisement
Guest User

reply by me

a guest
Mar 24th, 2017
131
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.41 KB | None | 0 0
  1. It's just fabulous, a QQSaltyPlayer saying without any real argumentation that SSF2 is pure shit. :jigglypuff:
  2. Now, let's compare it with a little bit of argumentation :
  3.  
  4. 7mag the bombermain wrote:
  5. It's balanced so bad
  6.  
  7. The only thing isn't balanced in SSF2 imo is the MU Coverage of Shielda, which imo gonna drop down a lot at the beta release.
  8.  
  9.  
  10. 7mag the bombermain wrote:
  11. and 4 anime characters
  12.  
  13. Nope. Just nope. Yeah they are anime characters but nope. This argument isn't an argument at all. And btw they are in a Nintendo game, that's why they're here. (waiting for JJBA character lulz [i know they said it's over with the anime characters])
  14.  
  15.  
  16. 7mag the bombermain wrote:
  17. The physics are wonky and I don't get how anybody could possibly like such a bad game. Just play Crusade. Balanced so much better.
  18.  
  19. I downloaded Crusade few weeks ago just for get a constructive idea about this game and.. damn. All you say is just some fanboy-speech.
  20. To be honest, yeah there is one thing about the physic that need more job on it in SSF2 and it's the Kaioken form. (the dash and the teleport glitch for more precision)
  21. But, damn i tried Crusade and it's not better at all : i was like "dude ? there is a mode for getting originals smashs physics ? really ? let's try this !" and activated melee physics. And.. i can't WD at all.
  22. For the balance, it's like i sayed before about SSF2. So let's talk about a game with "soo much characters". Nope. Just nope. For the few tests i make, there is a lot of bad characters. Maybe there is characters that i dosen't know how to play them but damn, you can't say all characters are balanced with only few "godtiers" that are godtiers due to MU Coverage. (like Shielda in SSF2)
  23.  
  24.  
  25. 7mag the bombermain wrote:
  26. Better maps.
  27.  
  28. Lul. You're joking or you are really a bad or casual player for saying the stages count that much you can use them as argument. The most part of the smash game is the competitive scene, where the stages have usually a lot of recurrent patterns. (like FD and Battlefield ones) There is few rare patterns on the other games that are open in SSF2 competitively. (Tower of Salvation and Dracula's Castle as a counterpick IIRC for example) The only one pattern i saw potentially good for competition in Crusade was the one with one large platform and one other platform over the first but a little bit smaller. (dosen't remember the name)
  29.  
  30.  
  31. 7mag the bombermain wrote:
  32. More characters.
  33.  
  34. More characters is usually saying less balance. The more characters you add, more the game is hard to balance. So yeah more characters is cool, but if it's for getting the same two 100% pickrate borings characters in every tournaments, i prefer playing another game, cause games have to amuse the player, not force them to pick a character they dosen't want to play to win.
  35.  
  36.  
  37. 7mag the bombermain wrote:
  38. Just, so much better than the trashcan that you call ssf2 and it's community.
  39.  
  40. Just by posting here as a crusade fanboy you deteriorates the community that you came to represent.
  41. Yeah the SSF2 community isn't perfect, yeah they have players that are triggered by waiting about beta, yeah they have noobs that abuse of naruto and lloyd versus other noobs in online, yeah they have some dudes that enter in a online room and instant quit after. But at all, it's nothing if you consider the good and funny face of the community.
  42.  
  43. That was all for me, i gonna take the road of the sleepless night. :jigglypuff:
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement