TIME TO CLEAR FEW MORE MISCONCEPTIONS SPREAD BY KARNA PAGES-


1)KARNA DID NOT CALL DRAUPADI A PROSTITUTE,HE JUST CALLED HER UNCHASTE

¶ENGLISH EDITION:

Narrative from KMG Translation of Mahabharat

O son of the Kuru race, the gods have ordained only one husband for one woman. This Draupadi, however, hath many husbands. Therefore, certain it is that she is an #unchaste woman.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/­hin/m02/m02067.htm

Meaning of Unchaste(Oxford Dictionary):

Relating to or engaging in #sexual activity, especially of an illicit or #extramarital nature

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/unchaste

-------

¶HINDI EDITION:

NOW,LETS SEE WHAT THE GEETA PRESS EDITION HAS TO SAY,VIEW SCREENSHOT IN THE BELOW LINK-

http://s1243.photobucket.com/user/pawangup0/media/ScreenShot2014-11-24at15857am_zpsab1a2e4d.png.html

As you all can read,clearly written that Karna called draupadi a 'Vaishya'(Whore).

SO AS PER THE HINDI EDITION OF MAHABHARAT,KARNA CALLED DRAUPADI A #WHORE.

Even as per the Ganguly translation,term 'unchaste' is used which itself is a very dirty word.Ganguly did not used a more dirty term like 'Whore' for Draupadi.

--------

¶SANSKRIT EDITION:

NOW LETS TAKE THE SLOKA FROM SANSKRIT EDITION-

Sabha Parva,Chapter 61,Sloka 35

 एकॊ भर्ता सत्रिया देवैर विहितः कुरुनन्दन
 इयं तव अनेकवशगा बन्धकीति विनिश्चिता

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/mbs/mbs02061.htm

Translation:

The gods have ordained one husband for one women,this draupadi however has many,therefore she is certainly a harlot.

The word बन्धकीति means harlot(whore/vaishya).

---------

Some Karna fans say that Karna was right calling draupadi unchaste,according to shastra

(Kunto to Pandu)
Kunti addressed him, saying, 'The wise do not sanction a fourth delivery even in a season of distress. The woman having intercourse with four different men is called a Swairini (heanton/whore), while she having intercourse with five becometh a harlot(whore).

THOSE KARNA FANS ARE IDIOTS,HERE KUNTI WAS TALKING ABOUT 'NIYOGA',DRAUPADI'S CASE WAS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.THETE IS NO SHASTRA WHICH SAID THAT IF WOMEN KEPT RELATION WITH HER HUSBAND,SHE IS WRONG OR UNCHASTE !!

-------------------------------------------

2)SAMMOHANASTRA IS BANNED IN WAR-

Since Karna got defeated badly,infact completely demolished by Arjun in Viraat war,the karna fans have comeup with a foolish excuse that Sammohanastra is banned in war.Lolz

FIRSTLY,LET ME TELL YOU ALL,SAMMOHANASTRA WAS USED BY ARJUN AT THE DAY END,

BEFORE USING SAMMOHANASTRA,ARJUN HAD ALREADY DEFEATED KARNA THREE TIMES AND MADE HIM FLEE TWO TIMES.

NOW,ITS NOWHERE WRITTEN THAT SAMMOHANASTRA IS BANNED IN THE WAR,THE FACT IS SAMMOHANASTRA ALSO HAS A COUNTER WEAPON,CALLED 'PRAJNA ASTRA'.

SAMMOHASTRA WAS USED IN KURUKSHETRA BY DRISHTADYUMNA,AND DRONA NULLIFIED IT WITH PRAJNA ASTRA-

Narrative:

Then Drona, possessed of great energy, that foremost of all wielders of weapons, heard of thy sons being deprived of their senses in battle with the #Pramohana weapon. Then the son of Bharadwaja, desirous of rescuing the princes, speedily left that part of the field where he was and proceeded to the place where thy sons were. And that mighty bowman viz., Bharadwaja's son of great prowess, there beheld Dhrishtadyumna and Bhima careering through the field in that dreadful conflict. And that mighty car-warrior beheld thy sons deprived of their senses. Taking up then the weapon called #Prajna, he #neutralised the #Pramohana weapon (that Dhrishtadyumna had shot).

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m06/m06077.htm

Pramohana and Sammohan are the same weapons,effect is the same,deprives the enemy of his senses.

So Drona posesses its counter weapon 'PRAJNA',Bhishma was unaffected by Sammohan weapon,and all time looser Karna failed against this weapon,neither he had a counter of this weapon which Drona had,nor he had the skill to avoid its affect which bhishma had.

GIVING SAMMOHAN WEAPON TO SHAKUNI WILL DEFINATELY NOT MAKE HIM A GREAT WARRIOR AGAINST ARJUN,BHISHMA OR DRONA,BECAUSE THEY CAN COUNTER IT,BUT AGINST KARNA IT WILL,BECAUSE KARNA WILL NOT FIND A WAY TO STOP THIS WEAPON,INSTEAD HE WILL FIND A WAY TO EXIT THE BATTLEFIELD...ROFL :D

AND ONE MORE THING,ARJUN USED SAMMOHANASTRA BECAUSE HE HAD TO FINISH THE WAR QUICKLY,IT WAS CLOSE TO SUNSET,AND HE WAS NOT WILLING TO KILL BHISHMA OR DRONA,HE JUST HAD TO RESCUE THE COWS.SO SAMMOHAN WEAPON WAS THE BEST OPTION THAT TIME.ARJUN HAD ALREADY DEFEATED THE WHOLE KURU ARMY ALONE,ALSO DEFEATED THE KAURAV MAHARATHI'S LIKE BHISHMA,DRONA,KARNA,DURYODHAN ETC.AND USE OF SAMMOHAN ASTRA IS NOT AN ACT OF COWARDICE, 14 TIMES RUNNING AWAY FROM BATTLE FIELD IS,LOL