26 Lesta Nediam LNC2017-01-03 2100 +Terran Downvale

Lesta Nediam LNC2017-01-03 2100 +Terran Downvale
https://plus.google.com/u/0/112413489582307671009/posts/ZA1tMQ8BYYC
https://pastebin.com/2HDiHjCp
__

+Terran Downvale __ I don't know how often it is that people douse others in a flammable liquid and then set them on fire. Assuming it's all genuine - do we hear about every case of it happening or are we more inclined to hear of it only when something about the incident matters to the lie system.

Such as - in addition to "withholding sufficient proof" (and all that goes with it) - this event involved people who had some kind of "name" that related to "fire/burning" (tacitly reinforcing the belief that a person's name becomes a kind of "self-fulfilling prophecy" which may be a long-term "agenda").

The names surely do seem to be "beyond mere coincidence" given how rare these events must be (really - what *are* the odds!). This aspect can of course be pointed out *_but it would be a mistake to conclude the event didn't happen because of it_* etc. That is what a "hoaxtard" or "auto-hoaxer" trapped in the planned dichotomy would do.

Yes - the names involved do lead to (unconscious) doubt suppression for the general population given that the following thought can easily arise: _"Uh - hang on - could someone be yanking our chain here??"_

So what is a genuine skeptic who has risen above the planned dichotomy to do? Point these things out! For example - point out that the names can cause an intelligent person who is paying attention to reasonably suspect it didn't happen (but that it would be to commit the "fallacy of the conspiracy theorist" to *conclude* it didn't) and that those who *don't* suspect it didn't happen *_have quietly suppressed such doubt_*.

Why have they quietly suppressed their doubt? because the odds of so many names occurring in such a related way to the incident warrant such a thought arising *_even if only for a moment_* - but if the thought doesn't arise *EVEN FOR A MOMENT* then the doubt has been successfully suppressed *due to trust in the story teller*.

And that's the "training" taking place each time a news story like this is read. Upon reading the story there are ways for it to be doubted. Just because it can be doubted doesn't mean it didn't happen - but those who read the story and have *no doubts* about it have been trained to unconsciously suppress those doubts.

These points can be brought up with practically every news article! If an article lacks sufficient proof and has *good reasons* to doubt it then the only reason a person wouldn't (if only for a millisecond) is because they have been trained to unconsciously suppress that doubt. That's the "lie system formula" being applied over and over. (Propaganda needs repetition to be effective and in this case the "formula" is repeated throughout a wide range of "news stories" which is what makes it effective [and identifiable!].)

__

Then again - perhaps the algorithm is responsible for arranging this event to happen and is showing off. That is - it has not just influenced people to get into a serious/deadly situation but has managed to target those who happen to have names that ironically/comically relate to the nature of the incident itself.

*If the algorithm is that good then it's showing off _and we're all doomed!_*


______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.