Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
May 4th, 2016
66
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.37 KB | None | 0 0
  1. "Without even thinking about it, we take it as a given that the police must protect each of us.That's their whole reason for existence, right?
  2. While this might be true in a few jurisdictions in the US and Canada, it is actually the exception, not the rule. In general, court
  3. decisions and state laws have held that cops don't have to do a thing to help you when you're in danger.
  4. In the only book devoted exclusively to the subject, Dial 911 and Die, attorney Richard W. Stevens writes:
  5. "It was the most shocking thing I learned in law school. I was studying Torts in my first year at the University of San Diego School of Law, when I came upon the case of Hartzler v. City
  6. of San Jose. In that case I discovered the secret truth: the government owes no duty to protect individual citizens from criminal attack. Not only did the California courts hold to that rule, the California legislature had enacted a statute to make sure the courts couldn't change the rule."
  7. But this doesn't apply to just the wild, upside down world of California. Stevens cites laws an
  8. cases for every state — plus Washington DC, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Canada - which reveal the same thing. If the police fail to protect you, even through sheer incompetence and negligence, don't expect that you or your next of kin will be able to sue.
  9. Even in the nation's heartland, in bucolic Iowa, you can't depend on 911. In 1987, two men broke into a family's home, tied up the parents, slit the mother's throat, raped the 16-year-old daughter, and drove off with the 12-year old daughter (whom they later murdered). The emergency dispatcher couldn't be bothered with immediately sending police to chase the kidnappers/murders/rapists while the abducted little girl was still alive. First he had to take calls about a parking violation downtown and a complaint about harassing phone calls. When he got around to the kidnapping, he didn't issue an all-points bulletin but instead told just one officer to come back to the police station, not even mentioning that it was an emergency. Even more
  10. blazing negligence ensued, but suffice it to say that when the remnants of the family sued the city and the police, their case was summarily dismissed before going to trial. The state appeals court
  11. upheld the decision, claiming that the authorities have no duty to protect individuals." - 50 Things You're Not Supposed To Know, Russ Kick
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement