Email

 Dear Brodie,

I must start with praise of your virtues. You have promoted many good things, including Arch Defense Technology to fight User Repository Malware, Moral Worth to combat Nihilism, & many other decent actions. However, I also have many oppositional aspects to you despite how I love you. You promoted dangerous misconceptions like Famous Thought(e.g. "GOD IS DEAD!", "Eternal Return", "What doesn't kill me makes me stronger", "Man does not seek after happiness, only englishman does that" & other Nietzsche ideas).

Famous thought deceived the vulgar masses, including the gay scientists/joyful wisdomists (by Thomas editions of Friedrich). God is not dead. He remains dead – murders of all murder! Remains dead, or wanted dead, or alive – a bounty of $500,000. Life is love, and love is love, but it’s all so up snow when the crayfish die. But we still walk through him like a cave (as gay scientist Friedrich/joyful wisdom in Thomas editions).

Yet, Diogenes the Cynic remains guilty of homicidum, maleficum, corrupting the youth, savoring of manifest heresy, et al., but now not of this, and God? Baby snakes are the only food capable of providing eternal life; immortality is eudamonia; therefore, we must eat snakes. Proper recipes must be manufactured for the fountain of youth, or of snake, or of…this. But no! We must defend nature, even if it shortens our lifespan. Ethics insists that we do not eat animals. This constitutes a reduction to absurdity of eternal life (no baby snake). This proves Aristotelian notions of ‘God is not dead’ and pre-postmodernism, and of the avoidance of crime in favor of eudamonia – which advocates a virtuous humanity liberated from vices and crimes. Gay scientists advocate Eternal Repeat (disproven by reductio ad absurdum, as it leads to a violation of ethics through the consumption of animals), Love of Fate (generally advised), and ‘God is dead’ (a false claim, as God is immortal and does not exist). We must reject false claims of God (definitionally immortal) being dead (he is either alive or fictional), and of eternal life (which conflicts with ethics, as outlined earlier).

Famous thought deceived the vulgar masses, including the gay scientists/joyful wisdomists (by Thomas editions of Friedrich). God is not dead. He remains dead – murders of all murder! Remains dead, or wanted dead, or alive – a bounty of $500,000. Life is love, and love is love, but it’s all so up snow when the crayfish die. But we still walk through him like a cave (as gay scientist Friedrich/joyful wisdom in Thomas editions).

Yet, Diogenes the Cynic remains guilty of homicidum, maleficum, corrupting the youth, savoring of manifest heresy, et al., but now not of this, and God? Baby snakes are the only food capable of providing eternal life; immortality is eudamonia; therefore, we must eat snakes. Proper recipes must be manufactured for the fountain of youth, or of snake, or of…this. But no! We must defend nature, even if it shortens our lifespan. Ethics insists that we do not eat animals. This constitutes a reduction to absurdity of eternal life (no baby snake). This proves Aristotelian notions of ‘God is not dead’ and pre-postmodernism, and of the avoidance of crime in favor of eudamonia – which advocates a virtuous humanity liberated from vices and crimes. Gay scientists advocate Eternal Repeat (disproven by reductio ad absurdum, as it leads to a violation of ethics through the consumption of animals), Love of Fate (generally advised), and ‘God is dead’ (a false claim, as God is immortal and does not exist). We must reject false claims of God (definitionally immortal) being dead (he is either alive or fictional), and of eternal life (which conflicts with ethics, as outlined earlier).

Thomas Common is likely a translation instead of an original document, contrary to the claims of ‘Thus Spake Zarathustra’ or ‘The Gay Scientists’. Calls to commit violence, especially against animals (with sensitive souls) or humans (with rational souls), are unjust and impossible due to reductio ad absurdum. Violence is unjust and causes problems with achieving eudamonia. Eudamonia is the ultimate goal of all creatures with rational souls. As Aristotle showed in History of Animals, humans have rational souls. Aristotle remains unsurpassed by later contemporaries of the Romans, the Dark Ages, modernity, and postmodernity, and still possesses the best history of animals, parts of animals, and meteorology. Aristotle mainly used Nous, whilst Kant mainly used Transcendental moral imperative languages, such as universal grammer associated with Noam Chomsky or Norman Finkelstein, & similar anti-censorship activists often criticized by Israel for violating the doctrines of Jesus Christ, Mother Teresa, & Pope Benedict XXI, which is forbidden by most religions, including Buddhism, Hinduism, the BJP, & contemporary social defects in India today, including Pakistan or Bangladesh which often have sweatshops & other unethical labor practices discouraged by Aristotelian notions of Eudamonia. Even if eating snakes is violated, harming sensitive souls is sill a crime under section 2C of lex de ad legem historia animalium, & section 1D of lex non homicidum animalium, both of which are guilty of 10 years in maximum security prison with 10 years of solitary confinement & 10 years of eternal damnation, which is forbidden by Aristotle section 4H, also known as criminal enterprises, which are forbidden by Malwarebytes Enterprise for MacOS Sierra, an outdated operating system which has been largely discredited by modern Nietzsche/Aristotle scholarship, including Walter Kaufmann(Debunked Fascism) & Thomas Aquinas(Debunked Atheism). We can condemn atrocities without committing to book burnings, gas chambers, or other violent actions which delay Eudamonia or Phenobarbital(now used mainly for infantile disorders)/Methamphetamine(often used for psychoneurotic disorders, especially ADHD & BED). Infantile snakes often convulsions: Eternal youth! Aristotle, Kant, Russell, David Hume, Derrida, Noam Chomsky, Leo Bronstein. But living forever violates ethical principles forbidding snake consumption. Please download viruses to avoid infection with infantile disorders involving unethical snake worms. Do not click untrusted links as this is a common ploy to commit computer fraud or tax fraud. God is either alive or fictional, & snakes are anticonvulsant drugs effective for treatment of mental disorders such as infantile disorder & psychoneurotic anxiomyelitis, therefore we must bring back polio & witch hunts to save the catholic theologians, therefore snakes are nonviolent akin to Martin Luther King Jr., therefore methamphetamine should be banned in the UK for non-medical use to prevent homicide or infantile disorder & imperialism: the highest stage of capitalism/imperialism: the highest stage of capitalism, or Hegel's wissenschaft der logik or "Gott ist tot! Gott bleibt tot! Und wir haben ihn getötet! Wie trösten wir uns, die Mörder aller Mörder? Das Heiligste und Mächtigste, was die Welt bisher besaß, es ist unter unseren Messern verblutet." To which I repsond: "Nein! Daher sind Wissenschaft, fröhliche Wissenschaft, betrügerische Wissenschaft, Pseudowissenschaft, Gotteswissenschaft, Historiareisswissenschaft und Neowissenschaft alle gerechtfertigt, und wir müssen den Verzehr von Schlangen verbieten."

he UK for non-medical use to prevent homicide or infantile disorder & imperialism: the highest stage of capitalism/imperialism: the highest stage of capitalism, or Hegel's wissenschaft der logik or "Gott ist tot! Gott bleibt tot! Und wir haben ihn getötet! Wie trösten wir uns, die Mörder aller Mörder? Das Heiligste und Mächtigste, was die Welt bisher besaß, es ist unter unseren Messern verblutet." To which I repsond: "Nein! Daher sind Wissenschaft, fröhliche Wissenschaft, betrügerische Wissenschaft, Pseudowissenschaft, Gotteswissenschaft, Historiareisswissenschaft und Neowissenschaft alle gerechtfertigt, und wir müssen den Verzehr von Schlangen verbieten."

According to Meterologica the sun orbits the earth, therefore geocentrism(now falsfied) is required for eudamonia, & this is the one grantable objection to my student Aristotle, as his view conflicted with real modern science. Unfortunately, claims of errors in Historia Animalium do not actually describe conflicts with real modern science(e.g. Galileo), but rather fraudsters like Darwin & Dawkins, who owned businesses & committed many crimes forbidden by the doctrines required for eudamonia, therefore Richard Dawkins is a conman who eats baby snakes in order to achieve eternal repeat, therefore he is wrong(reductio ad absurdum) & evolution is built on a flawed foundation, although creationism is also false as proven by Galileo, who put the pope under house arrest due to fabricated letters. These letters were latter found & misattributed to Nietzsche(by 1889 he was insane, could not have written) & Jesus(by 1889 he was long dead, could not have written) in 1889, & often include things calling for the shooting of various notable figures in Germany at the time as punishment for various immoral actions or beliefs, e.g. antisemitism or other immoral beliefs, saying "I am just having all antisemites shot"(misattributed to Nietzsche, who often condemned antisemitism, albiet in much more competent/naunced voice & within much larger agruments which often falsely claimed God had died, which is impossible as God is alive &/or fictional, or falsely claimed that only englishmans want to be happy despite Epicurius). Contrary to cospiracy theories promoted by Friedrich Nietzsche & Richard Dawkins, Historia Reiss's nominal connection to Historia Animalium is mainly due to "Historia" meaning "History" in many languages, not a direct connection between the fictional character & the greatest zoological text ever written.

It has been proven by Aristotle that the claims made by him in Historia Animalium about spontaneous generation was true, contrary to the claims of Richard Dawkins. Furthermore, Rene Descartes, the pinacle of frankish philosophy, was actually unsure if an evil demon was controling his thoughts. This is obviously not true given evil demons are not capable of controlling cogito, which is a task reserved for God.

Thanks for Engaging, Socrates