Advertisement
Guest User

HYPOTHETICAL/SIMULATED CASE #2

a guest
Dec 11th, 2019
148
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 1.64 KB | None | 0 0
  1. [EVIDENCE OF REPORTED PERSON BEING ATTACKED]
  2.  
  3. Vaktovian Private First Class #1 has a report on him on disciplinary infractions, resulting in him insulting someone on the other team and complaining of people on his team as well.
  4.  
  5. The current evidence given & report on the person that was insulted, Private #1.:
  6.  
  7. PVT #1 has a clean record and has only been accepted into our main ranks two weeks ago. He however has had fights at the start of his VAC career.
  8.  
  9. PFC #1 - "I have no actual video proof of it but there have been several things happening and I can gather witnesses for it. With taunting, I meant several things. He would always run close to my body and spam A&D as if he was half-turning making a joke that I died. On several occasions, he has also T-bagged me, and he has shot at my dead body. I simply do not know whether the shooting at my dead body was an accident or not."
  10.  
  11. Witness #6 (A new L1 VAC) - "I did evidently notice that Private #1 was taunting PFC #1. I simply did not report or say anything because I did not know T-bagging was not allowed"
  12.  
  13. Witness #7 - "I noticed a few minor infractions but nothing severe. I saw Private #1 run over the person once, but I'm not sure whether it was meant intentional or not. It would be somewhere in the middle. "
  14.  
  15. Witness #8 - "I did evidently see Private #1 T-bag as well as shooting the dead body of PFC #1. I even have proof of such". #8 provides proof of PVT #1 shooting PFC #1's dead body, however, it is sketchy proof. We must determine whether it is useable or not.
  16.  
  17. Witness #9 - "I did notice that PVT #1 has run over the dead body. I did not see him T-bag or shoot a dead body, however."
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement