Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Sep 15th, 2015
71
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 7.63 KB | None | 0 0
  1. # MPhys Projects
  2.  
  3. ## Experimental
  4.  
  5. - Advanced Manufacturing for Bioengineering Applications
  6. - Dr Scott Lewis (scott.lewis@manchester.ac.uk)
  7. - Using e-beam lithography to create structures for building synthetic biological cells
  8. - learn to use e-beam lithography
  9. - fabricate resist material that works at low res
  10. - use python to convert SEM scans of kidneys to something lithographable
  11. - lithograph it
  12. - fill it with cells?
  13. - Pros
  14. - Really cool
  15. - Bioengineering!
  16. - Nice mix of doing stuff and programming stuff
  17. - Cons
  18. - Bit matieralsy? Not necessarily a bad thing
  19. - What if we can't fabricate the material?
  20. - Not very theoretical
  21.  
  22. - Securing the Future of Moore's Law
  23. - Dr Scott Lewis (scott.lewis@manchester.ac.uk)
  24. - Fabricate better materials fo use with Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography
  25. - learn to use EUVL
  26. - make a material based on monte-carlo designs of electron scattering
  27. - test it
  28. - Pros
  29. - Pretty cool
  30. - Cons
  31. - Not as cool as above
  32.  
  33. - Quantitation in MALDI Mass Spec
  34. - Dr Adam McMahon (adam.mcmahon@manchester.ac.uk)
  35. - Try to improve precision of MALDI techniques
  36. - Pros
  37. - Pretty cool
  38. - Biophys
  39. - Programming to simulate optics sounds neat
  40. - Christie-based
  41. - Cons
  42. - Don't know much chemistry. Dan might.
  43. - Christie-based
  44. - Not very theoretical
  45.  
  46. - Building control and data-acquisition systems for undergrad experiments
  47. - Prof Andrew Murray (andrew.murray@manchester.ac.uk)
  48. - Dr Matthew Harvey (matthew.harvey@manchester.ac.uk)
  49. - Using Arduinos to make undergrad lab not shit
  50. - Pros
  51. - Doing actual work to fix exactly what I always say is wrong with undergrad labs
  52. - Plenty of programming
  53. - Cons
  54. - Andy Murray may still think I'm an idiot
  55. - Not very theoretical
  56. - Not necessarily very physicsy either
  57.  
  58. - Fractal structures in urban development
  59. - Dr Ingo Dierking (ingo.dierking@manchester.ac.uk)
  60. - Using fractal dimension techniques to study the shape of urban developments in different continents and different types of cities like rapidly-grown ones versus old ones aaaaugh
  61. - Pros
  62. - Oh my god it's fractals and cities and doing maths to history and it's like all of my favourite things came down and birthed a lab project
  63. - Plenty of opportunity for data-vis, I reckon
  64. - Image processing to automate fractal dimension-counting, maybe?
  65. - Cons
  66. - Does it not having a C next to it mean he doesn't anticipate/want much computering?
  67.  
  68. - Measuring the tactile input to the brain from whiskers
  69. - Dr Tom Waigh (t.a.waigh@manchester.ac.uk)
  70. - Using models and video of animal whiskers to understand how they deform and correlating this to electrical impulses to better understand the "world-brain interface"
  71. - Pros
  72. - Programming!
  73. - Biomechanics!
  74. - Cons
  75. - Not theoretical at all
  76.  
  77. - Observing Matter/Antimatter differences in Charm
  78. - Lepton Flavour Violation at LHCb
  79. - Prof Christ Parkes (chris.parkes@cern.ch)
  80. - Different projects but both use ROOT to do particley stuff. First one looks fairly similar to 3rd yar
  81. - Pros
  82. - Can already use ROOT
  83. - Cons
  84. - Means we have to use ROOT (might get to try using python instead though)
  85. - Need to convince Chris we're not still idiots
  86. - Probably quite contested by PPRSC nerds
  87.  
  88. - First LHCb Analysis for CERN Open Data Portal
  89. - Prof Chris Parkes (chris.parkes@cern.ch)
  90. - Design a research project for cool teens based on our 3rd-year lab project
  91. - Pros
  92. - Very cool and outreachey
  93. - Have work published on CERN website if successful!
  94. - Cons
  95. - Probably hotly contested by PPRSC nerds
  96. - Need to convince Chris we're not still idiots
  97.  
  98. ## Theoretical projects
  99.  
  100. - Stochastic dynamics of cancer evolution
  101. - Dr Tobias Galla (tobias.galla@manchester.ac.uk)
  102. - Michael's thing!
  103. - Pros
  104. - Plenty of cool programming for the stochastic tunnelling
  105. - Cool stats
  106. - Tobias!
  107. - Curing cancer
  108.  
  109. - Evolutionary multi-player games in switching environments
  110. - Dr Tobias Galla (tobias.galla@manchester.ac.uk)
  111. - Game theory multi-player thingy, bunch of stochastic stuff
  112. - Pros
  113. - Cool stochastic programming
  114. - Tobias!
  115. - Cons
  116. - Don't understand a bloody word of it
  117.  
  118. - Idiots in a queue
  119. - Dr Tobias Galla (tobias.galla@manchester.ac.uk)
  120. - Queueing theory simulations
  121. - Pros
  122. - Qualify us for jobs at disneyland
  123. - Plenty o' programming
  124. - Tobias!
  125. - Opportunity for analytical approach also
  126. - Cons
  127. - Looses out on the Cool Factor
  128.  
  129. - Plasma Wakefield Acceleration (M)
  130. - Dr Guoxing Xia (guoxing.xia@manchester.ac.uk)
  131. - Dr Oznur Mete (oznur.mete@manchester.ac.uk)
  132. - Analysing and simulating physics in wakefield accelerators
  133. - Pros
  134. - Bunch of different aspects to study
  135. - Exceedingly cool next-gen-accelerator stuff
  136. - Analytical and programming segments
  137. - Cons
  138. - Wasn't planning on taking Frontiers, might not have to though
  139.  
  140. - Particle-in-cell computer simulation of a plasma (M)
  141. - Prof Philippa Browning (p.browning@manchester.ac.uk)
  142. - Simulating a plasma
  143. - Pros
  144. - Fairly straightforward-sounding model-construction in language of our choice
  145. - Philippa's pretty cool
  146. - Cons
  147. - Don't know much about plasmas
  148.  
  149. - "Avalanche" modelling of solar flares
  150. - Prof Philippa Browning (p.browning@manchester.ac.uk)
  151. - Simulating circumstances leading to solar flares
  152. - Pros
  153. - Statistical model programming's always fun
  154. - Philippa's pretty cool
  155. - Cons
  156. - Don't know much about plasmas
  157.  
  158. - Time evolution in quantum mechanics and high frequency stabilisation of atoms (M)
  159. - Prof Niels Walet (niels.walet@manchester.ac.uk)
  160. - Using FFTs to time-evolve quantum systems computationally
  161. - Pros
  162. - FFTs are very cool
  163. - Plenty o' programming
  164. - Niels is scary but I like him
  165.  
  166. - Quantum Chaology (M)
  167. - Prof Niels Walet (niels.walet@manchester.ac.uk)
  168. - Computationally studying two different models for quantum chaos
  169. - Pros
  170. - Sweet jesus this is a sexy-looking project
  171. - Plenty o' programming
  172. - Niels is scary but I like him
  173. - Let me re-emphasise how sexy this looks
  174. - Cons
  175. - It also looks completely terrifying
  176.  
  177. - Modelling The Variable Radio Emission from Star Forming Regions In Our Galaxy (A)
  178. - Prof Gary Fuller (g.fuller@manchester.ac.uk)
  179. - Identifying and modelling the way stars of different types emit radio
  180. - Pros
  181. - Sounds pretty useful
  182. - Opportunity for fun data-vis?
  183. - Cons
  184. - Gary (might well be better one-on-one though)
  185.  
  186. - Water flow in confined nano graphene channels
  187. - Dr Jichen Li (j.c.li@manchester.ac.uk)
  188. - Simulating water diffusion through graphene channels of various shapes and sizes in order to understand biological nanostructues
  189. - Pros
  190. - As ways to apply nanoscience to biology go, this is a pretty cool one
  191. - Graphene is pretty sexy too
  192. - Cons
  193. - Unclear if actual physical graphene is involved
  194. - Full year only
  195.  
  196. - Predicting and understanding of heart diseases and heart vessels problems
  197. - Dr Jichen Li (j.c.li@Manchester.ac.uk)
  198. - Prof HG Zhang (h.zhang- 3@manchester.ac.uk)
  199. - Fouriering ECG graphs to predict heart defects
  200. - Pros
  201. - Medical awesomeness
  202. - Would love to try programming with fouriers
  203. - May discover heart defects in selves
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement