SHARE
TWEET

Untitled

a guest Jul 27th, 2019 111 Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
  1. any of the empirical estimates could be adjusted (male/female difference in masc/fem, les/female difference, lesbian rates, cis-by-default rates, rates at which boys raised as girls end up with gender issues, trans rates, heterosexuality among ftm rates, ...)
  2. even before puberty, boys look somewhat more masculine than girls. david reimer was mocked for being a "cavewoman". this might affect the attitudes of the cloacal exstrophy boys
  3. there's a question of how much of the variance in development of gender issues is stochastic, vs due to masculinity/gender nonconformity. my calculation assumes that it is entirely the latter, but arguably it may to a great degree be the former
  4. there's the whole issue of cloacal exstrophy boys requiring exogenous hormones
  5. probably more that I forget
RAW Paste Data
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy. OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
 
Top