hundred

Out of a hundred people who "debate" on the Internet, one might actually know how to debate in a non-partisan manner using fact and reason. And they are usually abused and accused of being partisan.

For instance, if you don't want Trump, for good reasons, you must want Hillary. If you don't want Hillary, for good reasons, you must want Trump.

Because it's a two-party system and YOU MUST CHOOSE, DAMMIT!

But what if you don't want the two-party system itself and want to grow third-parties as a forward-looking act? That may not work for the present, but most of us sacrifice as a plan for the future - putting money in the bank or buying car insurance.

And there is nothing in the Constitution stipulating only two parties. It's just that the two parties have a stranglehold and won't allow any other parties. But what are we getting from two corporatist parties? No matter which was in power we have had decades of endless war and middle-class collapse. Obviously, the two-party system no longer works, so going by its forced choice is a bogus choice that chooses nothing.