Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- [AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION & INTERNATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION]
- AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION
- INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL LIEN
- (This is a verified plain statement of fact)
- Date: OCTOBER 15, 2015
- Maxims:
- 1. All men and women know that the foundation of law and
- commerce exists in the telling of the truth, and nothing but the
- truth.
- 2. Truth, as a valid statement of reality, is sovereign in
- commerce.
- 3. An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.
- 4. An unrebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgment in
- commerce.
- 5. Guaranteed- All men shall have a remedy by the due course of
- law. If a remedy does not exist, or if the remedy has been
- subverted, then one may create a remedy for themselves - and
- endow it with credibility by expressing it in their affidavit.
- 6. Ignorance of the law might be an excuse, but it is not a
- valid reason for the commission of a crime when the law is
- easily and readily available to anyone making a reasonable
- effort to study the law.
- 7. All corporate government is based upon Commercial Affidavits,
- Commercial Contracts, Commercial Liens and Commercial
- Distresses. Hence, governments cannot exercise the power to
- expunge commercial processes.
- 1
- 8. The Legitimate Political Power of a corporate entity is
- absolutely dependent upon its possession of commercial Bonds
- against Public Hazard.
- 9. No Bond means no responsibility, means no power of Official
- signature, means no real corporate political power and means no
- privilege to operate statutes as the corporate vehicle.
- 10. The Corporate Legal Power is secondary to Commercial
- Guarantors. Case law is not a responsible substitute for a Bond.
- 11. Municipal corporations, which include cities, counties,
- states and national governments, have no commercial reality
- without bonding of the entity, its vehicle (statutes), and its
- effects (the execution of its rulings).
- 12. In commerce, it is a felony for the Officer/Public Office to
- not receive and report a Claim to its Bonding Company – and it
- is a felony for the agent of a Bonding Company to not pay the
- Claim.
- 13. If a bonding Company does not get a malfeasant public
- official prosecuted for criminal malpractice within (60) days,
- then it must pay the full face value of a defaulted Lien process
- at (90) days.
- 14. Except for a Jury, it is also a fatal offence for any
- person, even a Judge, to impair or to expunge, without a
- Counter-Affidavit, any Affidavit or any commercial process based
- upon an Affidavit.
- 15. Judicial non-jury commercial judgments and orders originate
- from a limited liability entity called a municipal corporation –
- hence must be reinforced by a Commercial Affidavit and a
- Commercial Liability Bond.
- 2
- 16. A foreclosure by a summary judgment (non-jury) without a
- commercial bond is a violation of commercial law.
- 17. Governments cannot make unbounded rulings or statutes which
- control commerce, free-enterprise citizens, or sole
- proprietorships without suspending commerce by a general
- declaration of martial law.
- 18. It is tax fraud to use Courts to settle a dispute/
- controversy which could be settled peacefully, outside of or
- without the Court.
- 19. An official (officer of the court, policeman, etc.) must
- demonstrate that he/she is individually bonded in order to use a
- summary process.
- 20. An official who impairs, debauches, voids or abridges an
- obligation of contract, or the effect of a commercial lien
- without proper cause, becomes a lien debtor – and his/her
- property becomes forfeited as the pledge to secure the lien.
- Pound breach (breach of impoundment) and rescue is a felony.
- 21. It is against the law for a Judge to summarily remove,
- dismiss, dissolve or diminish a Commercial Lien. Only the Lien
- Claimant or a Jury can dissolve a Commercial Lien.
- 22. Notice to agent is notice to principal; notice to principal
- is notice to agent.
- 23. PUBLIC HAZARD BONDING OF CORPORATE AGENT: All officials are
- required by Federal, State and Municipal Law to provide the
- name, address and telephone number of their public hazard and
- malpractice bonding company, the policy number of the bond and
- if required, a copy of the policy describing the bonding
- coverage of their specific job performance.
- 3
- Failure to provide this information constitutes corporate and
- limited liability insurance fraud (15 USC) and is prim-a-facie
- evidence and grounds to impose a lien upon the official,
- personally, to secure their public oath and service of office.
- 24. This International Commercial Obligation Lien is, in part,
- supported & prefaced on UCC-9/102 (Agricultural Liens); UCC
- 9/607-610 (Secured Party’s Right to take possession after
- default), with ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
- Parties:
- Lien Claimants:
- 1. Steven Duane Curry; (as a Witness, a Crime Victim, an
- Injured, Individual, Living Being, Representing All (Listed/
- Unlisted/Unknown/Multiple) Crime Victims, Injured parties,
- Individuals, Living Beings, and Inhabitants in the Territory
- known as Colorado, America, and elsewhere on all Tribal Lands).
- 21250 Dave Wood Road
- Montrose, Colorado [81403]
- (970)249-8879
- email: cwheileg@gmail.com
- 2. Anna Maria Riezinger
- c/o Box 520994 Rural Route 99652
- Big Lake, Alaska
- 3. James Clinton Belcher
- c/o Box 520994 Rural Route 99652
- Big Lake, Alaska
- 4. Sandra Lee Tyler
- 21250 Dave Wood Road
- Montrose, Colorado [81403]
- (970) 249-8879
- 4
- 5. James A. Porter
- P.O. Box 531
- Ridgway, Colorado [81432]
- (970)615-0381
- jporter2327@yahoo.com
- 6. James Robert
- c/o North Carolina,
- c/o 217 Paragon Parkway, #103, Clyde
- near [28721]
- 828-276-6163
- jacobiam543@gmail.com
- 7. Rocky-Lee:Hutson
- 525 1/2 32 1/8 Road
- Clifton, Colorado [81520-9998]
- 970) 589-2336
- 8. gary-dean: darby
- C/o General Post-Office
- Private mailbox 1290
- Board shanty Rd
- Grants Pass, Oregon Nation
- Near [97527-9998]
- Non domestic
- 541-862-2074
- 9. Stephen Michael Keno
- 1020 Hurt dr.
- Pagosa Springs, Co. 81147
- 970-731-9729
- keno.steve@yahoo.com
- 10. David Lynn Coffelt
- 11. Marcia Ann Coffelt
- 2000 W 92nd Avenue - Lot 85
- Federal Heights, CO 80260
- 303-853-9914 Res
- 720-206-8717 Cell
- davecoffelt@comcast.net
- 12. Connie Joy Bedwell
- 7042 Sprig Dr.
- Sacramento, California 95842
- 5
- Cjasbedwell@yahoo.com/ PleaseHelp@SaveAaliyah.com
- (916) 532-2801
- 13. Aaliyah Sky Bedwell
- (Authorizing agent: Connie Joy Bedwell)
- 7042 Sprig Dr.
- Sacramento, California 95842
- Cjasbedwell@yahoo.com/ PleaseHelp@SaveAaliyah.com
- (916) 532-2801
- 14. Timothy Brock Bedwell
- (Authorizing agent:
- Connie Joy Bedwell)
- 7042 Sprig Dr.
- Sacramento, California 95842
- Cjasbedwell@yahoo.com/ PleaseHelp@SaveAaliyah.com
- (916)532-2801
- 15. Rob Driskell
- P.O. Box 26012
- Colorado Springs, Colorado [80936]
- 719-201-5392
- rdriskell@unseen.is
- 16. Michael Driskell
- 4990 Decatur St.
- Denver, Colorado [80221]
- 720-514-0111
- 58michaeld@gmail.com
- 17. Troy W Brown
- 6351 W Brittany Place
- Littleton Colorado
- 720 561-1800
- 18. Greg Giehl
- PO Box 5817
- Pagosa Springs, Colorado
- Landline# 970-264-0055,
- 19. Esther Jean Williams
- 1024 East Ash Street
- Pueblo, CO 81001
- (719) 544-5362
- estherwilliams@comcast.net
- 6
- 20. Janis Blease
- Janis80138@msn.com
- 21. Johnny Bernarld Mikel, the man,
- 109 South Independence Avenue
- Dearing, Kansas 67340-9998
- non domestic outside U.S.A.
- jbm41161@yahoo.com
- 620-515-5165
- 22. John Guarneri
- P.O. Box 152253
- Cape Coral, Florida. 33904
- xxjohnnyg@yahoo.com
- (239)850-4408
- 23. Mike Makuh
- c/o 109 Gordon Creek rd,
- Boulder, Colorado [80302]
- 24. Susan Beth Ysmael-Hulsebus
- 4501 Pheasant Lane
- Rocklin, CA [95865]
- skyleramelia@yahoo.com,
- 209-217-4948
- 25. Erin Elizabeth Hale
- 1627 Sixth Street
- Woodland CA 95695
- PlexusByE@yahoo.com
- (916) 899-1580
- 26. Gregory Alan Johnson
- c/o P.O. 1322
- Colorado Springs, Colorado
- Non-Domestic, w/o US
- gregaj7@gmail.com
- 719-630-0847
- 27. Virginia Noel Nye
- 311 Rainbow Lane
- Vineland NJ [08360]
- virginianye27@gmail.com
- (856) 974-3932
- 28. Anastasia Victoria Hartnett
- 7
- PO Box 595
- Crystal Bay, NV 89402
- 530.448.6014
- 29. Rebecca Sarah Montoya
- PO BOX 55 Serafina, NM 87569
- SaveMaryAndGrace@gmail.com
- 505.426.5048
- 30. Barbara A. Monroe
- 6718 S. Dewberry
- Boise Idaho 83709
- exchange4madi@gmail.com
- 707-396-2908
- 31. Marry Ingram
- P.O. Box 662
- Aurora, Missouri [65605]
- 417 2299782 marrysehrt@gmail.com
- 32. Susan A Whitney
- 3629 Lasick Ct Antelope, CA 95843
- (916) 316-0474
- Sueawhitney@gmail.com
- 33. Jessica Jacobs
- 2608 Kokanee way
- Sacramento California
- [95826]
- Jessjacobs23@gmail.com
- 415-385-4012
- 34. Tracy Lee Silva
- W5448 Shady Lane Rd.
- Mauston WI 53948
- Silvatra@Gmail.com
- (414)803-2345
- 35. chris-harold: house of cave
- c/o Post local box 43692
- near Las Vegas, Nevada [99999]
- 36. Dominick Guarneri
- 171 Lombardy Lane
- 8
- Banning, California 92220
- 714 747 4477
- xxairmen@yahoo.com
- 37. Frank Schneider
- 13816 Cornishcrest Road
- Whittier, California 90605
- FrankaSchneider@gmail.com
- 38. Robert J. Intlekofer
- 4625 east county rd.#54
- Fort Collins, Colorado
- 970-214-8754
- intlekoferb@yahoo.com.I’am
- 39. Edward George Novotny
- 40. Etta Beulah Novotny
- 917 Brookside Dr.
- Cortez, Colorado [81321
- (970) 565-8353
- enlaw14@msn.com
- 41. Nelson Diaz Scott
- P.O. Box 1114
- Delta, Colorado [81416]
- 970-623-1142
- 42. Jakob Hunter Kreycik
- P.O. Box 87
- Paonia, Colorado [81428]
- 970-527-6851
- kobi44@hotmail.com
- 43. David V. Graham
- 12 Little Brook Circle Fredericksburg Va. 22405
- 540-288-6333
- Davidgraham853@gmail.com
- 44. Teriann Colleen Davis
- 1403 Eagle St
- Murfreesboro, TN 37130
- 55tdavis55@gmail.com
- 615-999-9437
- 45. Fred Syndergaard
- 3199 S. 540 E.
- 9
- Salt lake city, Utah
- 84106
- (801)652-8730
- Fredwithfish@gmail.com
- 46. richard: house of ertle
- 4195 Douglas Ave. #517
- Sedalia, Colorado [80135-0517]
- 720 401 6340
- 47. Sheryl Taylor
- PO Box 897
- Memphis, Tennessee 38101
- 48. Bruce Doucette
- 2862 W Centennial Dr
- Littleton Colorado
- 720-338-0394
- 49. stephen-john: nalty
- c/o Post Office Box 11724
- Denver, Colorado
- Zip code exempt DMM 602 § 1.3 e (2)
- coloradoclgj2014forever@gmail.com
- 720.362.1213
- 50. Dennis Schuelke
- 218 Bluegrass Drive
- Hendersonville, TN 37075
- 615-824-5982
- 51. Jina Yvonne Keller
- James Howard Keller
- 1712 Sickle St.
- Monte Vista, Colorado 81144
- jinaykeller@yahoo.com
- 52. Jared Dominick Keller
- Joshua James Keller
- 1712 Sickle St.
- Monte Vista, Colorado 81144
- jinaykeller@yahoo.com
- 10
- Additional Lien Claimants: (Add your Name)
- ____________________________;
- Address/Contact Info: ____________________________________________________
- ____________________________;
- Address/Contact Info: ____________________________________________________
- ____________________________;
- Address/Contact Info: ____________________________________________________
- ____________________________;
- Address/Contact Info: ____________________________________________________
- ____________________________;
- Address/Contact Info: ____________________________________________________
- Lien Debtors:
- THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION; A CORPORATION, ET AL
- 321 North Clark Street
- Chicago, Illinois 60610
- Phone: 312-988-5000
- Fax: 312-988-5677
- THE INTERNATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION; A CORPORATION, ET AL
- 4TH FLOOR 10 ST BRIDE STREET
- LONDON EC4A 4AD
- UNITED KINGDOM
- TEL: +44 (0)20 7842 0090
- FAX: =44 (0)20 7842 0091
- Executive Office for United States Attorneys
- United States Department of Justice
- 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 2242
- Washington, DC 20530-0001
- Individual Executives, Officers, Directors, Board of Governors,
- Commission on Governance, Committee Members, as of October 6,
- 2015, including, but NOT limited to;
- DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE:
- MONTY WILKINSON; ESQUIRE
- 11
- A.B.A.: Paulette Brown, Esquire; President, 2015-2016
- Patricia Lee Refo, Esquire; Chair, House of Delegates, 2014-2016
- Lina A. Klein, Esquire; President Elect, 2015-2016
- Mary T. Torres, Esquire; Secretary, 2014-2015
- G. Nicholas Casey, Jr., Esquire; Treasurer, 2014-2017
- Jack L. Rives, Esquire; Executive Director, 2010-Present
- Kenneth Widelka, Esquire; Chief Financial Officer
- Carl Cooper Esquire; Member of President’s Counsel on Diversity
- Nathaniel L. Doliner J.D, Esquire.; Chairman of the Business Law
- Section
- Alicia L. Downey, Esquire; Member of Antitrust Law Council
- Jorge R. Gutierrez, Esquire; CPA
- Stephen N. Zack, Esquire; Boies, Schilier & Flexner LLP
- Timothy W. Bouch, Esquire; American Bar Association
- William C. Hubbard, Esquire; American Bar Association
- Dennis B. Drapkin, Esquire; American Bar Association
- Susan P. Serota, Esquire J.D.: Pillsbury Withrop Shaw Pittman
- LLP
- Commission on Governance:
- CO-CHAIR: Roberta D. Liebenberg, Philadelphia, PA; CO-CHAIR:
- James Dimos, Indianapolis; IN MEMBERS: William R. Bay, Saint
- Louis, MO; Michelle A. Behnke, Madison, WI; Deborah Enix-Ross,
- New York, NY; Ellen J. Flannery, Washington, DC; James S. Hill,
- Bismarck, ND; Kay H. Hodge, Boston, MA; Tommy Preston Jr.
- Columbia, SC; Beverly J. Quail, Denver, CO; Carlos A. Rodriguez-
- Vidal, San Juan, PR; Neal R. Sonnett, Miami, FL; Palmer Gene
- Vance II, Lexington, KY; Robert N. Weiner, Washington, D.C.; H.
- Thomas Wells Jr., Birmingham, AL; James A. Wynn Jr., Raleigh,
- NC; BOARD OF GOVERNORS LIASIONS: Laura V. Farber, Pasadena, CA;
- Michael E. Flowers, Columbus, OH; STAFF: Marina B. Jacks, Alpha
- M. Brady; Rochelle E. Evans;
- I.B.A: Mark Ellis, Esquire; Executive Director
- Talia Dove; Executive Assistant
- Elaine Owen; Head of BIC/Assistant to President
- 12
- Tim Hughes; Deputy Executive Director
- Donna Canty; Human Resources Director
- Joe Bell; Operations Director
- Glynn Davies; Head of Finance
- Additional Lien Debtors:
- _______________________Address:_________________________________
- _______________________Address:_________________________________
- _______________________Address:_________________________________
- Allegations:
- 1. The AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, the INTERNATIONAL BAR
- ASSOCIATION, and the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, are commercial
- derivations & subsidiaries of the Crown Templar, or Temple
- Crown, whose Corporate Headquarters is located in the City of
- London, England. Is this correct? Yes? or No? If No, please
- explain.
- 2. In 2007, William C. Hubbard, Esquire, received the American
- Inns of Court Professionalism Award for the Fourth Circuit. In
- 2015, he was called to the bench as an Honorary Bencher of the
- Middle Temple in London. Is this correct? Yes? or No? If
- No, please explain.
- 3. The A.B.A. was founded on August 21, 1878, in Saratoga
- Springs, New York, by 100 lawyers from 21 states. The I.B.A.,
- established in 1947, now has over 55,000 individuals and 195
- bar associations and law societies, and its organization
- continues to grow. Is this correct? Yes? or No? If No,
- please explain.
- 13
- 4. The first President of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION was it’s
- inceptor, creator, and implementor, James O. Broadhead.
- Representatives of 34 national bar associations gathered in
- New York, NY on 17 February 1947 to create the I.B.A.. Was
- this NOT an act of sediton, treason, and “Piracy on Land,”
- pursuant 18 USC #1651-1661? Yes? or No? If No, please
- explain.
- 5. Initial membership was limited to bar associations and law
- societies, but in 1970, I.B.A. membership was opened to
- individual lawyers. Members of the legal profession including
- attorneys, solicitors, barristers, advocates, members of the
- judiciary, in-house lawyers, government lawyers, academics and
- law students comprise the membership of the I.B.A.. Is this
- historical notation correct? Yes? or No? If No, please
- explain.
- 6. James O. Broadhead violated the Original & Organic XIII
- Amendment of the Constitution of the pre-1871 Continental
- uNited States of America, when, in 1878, he was chosen
- president of the American Bar Association, which met at
- Saratoga, N.Y.. In 1882, he was elected as the State’s
- representative to the 48th Congress as a Democrat, and in 1885
- was appointed by the government as special agent to make
- preliminary search of the record of the French archives in the
- matter of the French spoliation claims, making his report in
- October, 1885. He was U.S. minister to Switzerland, 1893-'97.
- Do you agree James O. Broadhead committed treason against the
- Continental United States government in forming the A.B.A.,
- 14
- and becoming its first President? Yes? or No? If No, please
- explain.
- 7. James O. Broadhead’s election & appointment were direct
- abrogations and usurpations of the 1803 Supreme Court ruling
- over Marbury v. Madison, wherein, John Marshal rendered a
- majority decision restricting Barristers & Esquires, and other
- holders of Titles of Nobility, from holding government, or
- public offices, and declared that, “prescribing, giving, or
- taking such Oaths of Office” to these offices was “a solemn
- mockery” against the US Constitution, against its people, and
- was “equally a crime.” If this is a correct assessment of the
- foundation & legacy of James O. Broadhead, it stands, then,
- that the entire concept, structural design, and the
- implementation of all contracts; ie, “Electoral College,”
- “Lifetime Judicial Appointments,” “Copyrighted, Revenuebearing
- Statutes, Codes, Rules, Ordinances,” etc., created by
- the A.B.A. are fraudulent, malicious, egregious, and corrupt
- to the A.B.A.’s core. Yes? or No? If No, please explain.
- 8. Mr. Broadhead’s coalition of 100 foreign agents (“attorneys”),
- who, in-concert, collusion, and conspiracy, created, with the
- encouragement, support, and aid & abetting of the Federal
- Reserve Debt Banking System, the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, in
- their efforts to “federalize,” “democratize,” “incorporatize,”
- “defraud,” and to silently overthrow the righteous & genuine
- Constitutional government of the united States, and to
- subvert, usurp, and to destroy the Unlienable & Natural Rights
- of the People & Tribal families, who resided & inhabited the
- Land, established by our Nation’s Founding Fathers. Would you
- 15
- agree with this assessment? Yes? or No? If No, please
- explain.
- 9. Is it NOT True, then, that, “fraud vitiates all contracts,“
- and that, all commercial contracts, including, but NOT limited
- to, ALL unlawful sentences & incarcerations of political
- prisoners (ie; imprisoned I.R.S. Lien Debtors, non-criminal
- offenders), wherein, such commercial contracts were all
- conceived in fraud, and lacking any moral & ethical character,
- are in direct conflict with Natural Law & Commercial Law, and
- thus, every A.B.A “contract” since 1882, whether verbal, or
- written, including, but not limited to all Judicial Oath’s of
- Office, falsely sworn to, and fraudulently securitized,
- monetized, and commercialized, are Null & Void, ab initio?
- Yes? or No? If No, please explain in detail.
- 10. Our country’s Founding Fathers established our Original &
- Organic Constitution under the “Land Jurisdiction,” and NOT
- the “Jurisdiction of the Sea,” or “Holy SEE,” with various
- “embargos” against acts of piracy, press-ganging, personage,
- slavery, barratry, and other notorious & potentially injurious
- foreign intrusions, including the Titles of Nobility Act, the
- XIII Amendment, Bills of Attainder, and other notable &
- honorasble acts and codifications of law that were to insure
- the health, safety, and welfare of our government, our lands,
- and our People. Is this historically correct? Yes? or No?
- 11. If your anwser to Question #10 is “Yes,” then under what law
- form, or forms, was the A.B.A., the I.B.A., and their minions,
- able to subvert & usurp the “Land Jurisdiction” with the mere
- “presumption” of the “Jurisdiction of the Sea?” (Please Select
- 16
- one, or more, law forms used) A. “Admiralty Law?” B. “Maritime
- Law?” C. “International Law?” D. “Commercial Law?” E. “Uniform
- Commercial Code?” “Roman Curia Law?”
- 12. The National Lawyer’s Guild was established in 1937, and,
- according to historic record, has its origins in the Communist
- Party. The A.B.A. was in protest of its establishment due to
- a belief that the N.L.G. was a “militant segment of the bar.”
- In comparison to the criminal, unethical, and immoral conduct
- & activities of the members & individuals of the A.B.A., the
- members & individuals of the N.L.G., even if they are referred
- to as Communists, are, truly, “Saints,” as the N.L.G.
- genuinely & honestly works for the people, and NOT for the
- corporations, as the A.B.A. does. Is this an accurate
- description & comparison of the A.B.A., and the N.L.G.? Yes?
- or No?
- 13. During the McCarthy era, the N.L.G. was accused by Attorney
- General Herbert Brownell Jr. as well as the House Un-American
- Activities Committee of being a Communist front organization.
- Federal Bureau of Investigation director J. Edgar Hoover
- repeatedly tried to get a successive Attorneys General to
- declare the N.L.G. a "subversive organization," but without
- success. If the A.B.A. was so opposed to the N.L.G., as
- alleged, why did the A.B.A.’s own Attorneys General, block the
- FBI’s, Brownell’s, the House Un-American Activities Committee,
- from prosecuting the N.L.G., when the A.B.A. claims the N.L.G.
- is, quite simply, “a militant segment of the bar (A.B.A.)?”
- Was this protest by members & individuals of the A.B.A. simply
- a ruse, or a Red Flag operation, to cloak the true intent &
- 17
- nature of the A.B.A., and banking elitist they represent?
- Please be specific in your answers!
- 14. The 1944 HUAC history asserted that the N.L.G. was merely "a
- streamlined edition of the International Juridical
- Organization," a Communist Party mass organization established
- in 1931. Is the A.B.A., and the I.B.A., not also, corporate
- members/associates of the INTERNATIONAL JURIDICAL
- ORGANIZATION? Yes? or No? If No, please explain.
- 15. The enactment of the 1948 Administrative Procedure’s Act
- following the A.B.A.’s 1947 BAR Treaty, created a multitude of
- quasi-government corporate agencies. Both efforts & Acts,
- further subverted all legitimate dejure government agencies to
- bring them under the A.B.A.’s corporate judicial control &
- administration, thus destroying the genuine & lawful Executive
- & Legislative branches of the people’s government. Yes? or
- No? If No, please explain the intent of these two efforts.
- 16. It is a well documented fact, that the A.B.A., and the
- I.B.A. are, quite simply, “political organizations” with
- distinct corporate connections to all nations, and State BAR
- Associations, Inns of the Courts, and to Districts & Middle
- Inns made up of adjoining State BAR Associations, and that, in
- order to “serve at the bench,” all judges, from a municipal
- “judge,” to the “Justices” of the US Supreme Court, according
- to the Federal Civil Procedures Act, MUST be members of the
- BAR. Does this “interstate districting,” and the “judicial
- mandating” for the seating of “judges,” “justices,” and
- “magistrates,” NOT violate every Nation’s/State’s General Laws
- & Rights, abridge individual voter & election rights, abrogate
- 18
- both State & Federal Constitutions, and completely nullifies
- the A.B.A.’s, and the I.B.A.’s very own “Articles of
- Incorporation,” “Policies & Procedures,” “Bylaws,” and their
- own “Professional Rules of Conduct?” Yes? or No?
- 17. Both the A.B.A., and I.B.A., market their wares & practices
- as “voluntary,” yet, in actual practice & execution, the
- A.B.A., and I.B.A., by all lawful & “legal” definitions,
- practice, what can only be defined as a “MONOPOLY” over the
- entire International & United States Justice Systems, and the
- A.B.A. dominates the genuine two branches of Continental
- government of the united States. Are the requirements set
- forth in the F.C.P.A., then, prima facie evidence of this
- criminal “MONOPOLIZING” of the Justice System, and does it
- NOT, in fact, encourage & promote the destablization of the
- world’s governments, through judicial & military occupation,
- political lobbying, social & economic manipulation, and
- inciting civil protest & unrest? Yes? or No? If No, please
- explain in detail.
- 18. Despite the fact, that, MONOPOLIES, and other antitrust
- R.I.C.O. activities, are both unlawful & “illegal” on the
- Land, the A.B.A., and the I.B.A., knowingly & willingly
- operate in Ultra Vires, and with total disregard & distain of
- human rights guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human
- Rights, and the numerous safeguards built into our State &
- Federal Constitutions. These safeguards are built into any
- number of our Maxims of Law, and our Constitutionally-derived
- laws, including 15 USC 1 & 2, which state very clearly &
- unambiguously, the penalties for operating in such a manner;
- 19
- 15 U.S. Code § 1 - Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty;
- “Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in
- restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is
- declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any contract or engage in any
- combination or conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a
- felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding
- $100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment
- not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the (this)
- court.”
- 15 U.S. Code § 2 - Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty, which states;
- “Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or
- conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or
- commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of
- a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding
- $100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment
- not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the (this)
- court.”
- 19. Used in concert & conjunction with this Commercial
- Obligation Lien, 15 USC 1 & 2, and the invocation of our
- “Crime Victim’s Rights” as defined & described under 18 USC
- #3771, the A.B.A., I.B.A., and the D.O.J., by the
- preponderance of well documented evidence, and by the sheer
- weight of notable & probable causes, already posted in, both,
- the private & public records, the individual members of the
- A.B.A., the I.B.A., and the D.O.J., acting in their “corporate
- capacities,” are found to be “guilty” on both counts, and are
- “guilty” of all crimes described under the “Piracy Codes” of
- 18 USC #1651-1661, and under 42 USC #14141-Cause of Action.
- 20
- Would you NOT agree, that the A.B.A., and D.O.J., enjoys
- rights, privileges, liberties, freedoms, and pursuits, that
- are NOT extended to, or enjoyed by non-union members? Yes? or
- No? If No, please explain why your laws are NOT shared by
- all, and why these laws do NOT apply equally to A.B.A.,
- I.B.A., or D.O.J. executives, directors, officers, members,
- employees, or their corporate contractors.
- 20. Given the incredible & irrefutable weight & preponderance of
- the evidence, even the private courts owned & administered by
- the A.B.A., the I.B.A., and the D.O.J., MUST find themselves
- “guilty-as-charged,” and MUST, therefore, under their very own
- revenue-bearing, statutory laws, convict themselves, less they
- be totally void of Human Morality, Ethics, Honor, or
- Character.
- 21. This request & demand by the Lien Claimants, for “written
- confessions & admissions,” of course, are NOT likely to be
- honored, yet, under 28 U.S. Code 455(a,b,c,d,e,f), which, in
- effect, and under multiple law systems, dissolves the
- Judiciary, a.k.a. “A.B.A.,” a.k.a. “I.B.A.,” a.k.a. “D.O.J.,”
- of ALL their jurisdiction, power, and authority, to hear, to
- adjudicate over such clear cases of fraud, or to act upon
- them, unless of course, the “corporate body,” itself, and all
- justices, judges, magistrate judges, bankruptcy judges,
- spouses or minor children, as whatever the case may be,
- “divests himself/herself/themselves of the “financial
- interests” that provide the grounds for their
- disqualification.”
- 21
- 22. For obvious reasons, as previously stated, the A.B.A.’s,
- the I.B.A.’s, and D.O.J.’s, private courts CANNOT begin to
- presume, or assume, to have subject-matter, personal, or
- territorial jurisdiction, power, or authority, over matters
- dealing with any Living Being, wherein, this Commercial
- Obligation Lien can only be dismissed by the Lien Claimant(s),
- or by a properly convened & seated common law jury,
- independent of the Crown Templar’s private courts. To the
- detriment of the A.B.A., the I.B.A., its Officers & Crew, and
- their entire membership, U.S. Code 28 #455 is, exceedingly,
- clear, and unambiguous in its mandates, and that, the common
- law jury, as drawn & specified in the International Commercial
- Lien processes, belongs to the People, and NOT to any
- corruptible corporate body politic. Are the People
- “incorporable” with the lack of full disclosure, and with the
- lack of their free willed & knowledgeable consent? Yes? or
- No? If No, please provide the International Law, of the Law
- of Merchants, giving the A.B.A., I.B.A., or the D.O.J., the
- right & privilege to create, legislate, or execute such
- presumptions, statutes, codes, ordinaces, rules, gratuitous
- bailments, bonds, contracts, or other colors of law.
- 23. In brief, U.S. Code 28 #455 requires & demands that all
- individual members of the A.B.A., the I.B.A., and D.O.J.,
- “divest” themselves of any & all “financial interests” in any
- corporation, or quasi-government agency, including their
- financial ties to the only True branches of the Continental
- united State’s government, their banks, their insurance
- companies, and their for-profit jail & prison systems. The
- A.B.A., I.B.A., and the D.O.J., in order to be in full
- contractual compliance with United States Code 28 #455, MUST ,
- 22
- without further obstruction, hesitation, or delay, release all
- military prisoners, corporate captives, and political
- hostages, currently being held against their free will, or
- imprisoned by force, threat, intimidation, blackmail,
- extortion, or by any other unlawful & criminal means. This
- includes nullifying all such contracts, and the immediate
- release of all dejure government law enforcement officials,
- employees, clerks, and staff, currently being held hostage by
- the BAR’s members and gatekeepers. In so doing, would you
- have any problem in implementing a “prisoner exchange
- program?” Yes? or No?
- 24. The A.B.A. has 410,000 members, and the I.B.A. has 55,000
- members, with each individual member acting & operating in
- their own “corporate capacities,” (P.C.’s, L.L.C.’s, etc.) and
- each member is, by corporate association, in violation of 15
- USC 1 & 2, for a total monetary penalty of SIX HUNDRED MILLION
- US GOLD DOLLARS ($600,000,000.), EACH, including Tort Claims
- of 3X’s, and TEN (10) YEARS imprisonment, per individual,
- corporate-body, per offense (ie; lobbied, legislated, and
- executed revenue-bearing statutes, codes, rules, ordinances,
- and every color of law crafted & copyrighted by the individual
- members of the A.B.A., the I.B.A.), per each crime victim (315
- Million+). With a minimum of 7,000 revenue-bearing statutes,
- codes, rules, ordinances, and colors of law, being lobbied,
- legislated, and executed by the A.B.A., I.B.A., and the
- D.O.J., every year since 1882, the total Claim for Remedy
- package would be staggering & overwhelming. Would you NOT
- agree? Yes? or No? If No, please apply your own rules of
- math to this equation, and provide the Lien Claimants the
- result.
- 23
- 25. Obviously, there is not enough gold in the world to cover
- these “Accounts Payable,” or the People’s “Accounts
- Receivables,” so the A.B.A., the I.B.A., and the D.O.J., along
- with all of their corporate affiliations MUST, by the sheer
- weight of the debt owed, be permanently dissolved, and their
- corporate, personal, and private assets forfeited, seized,
- recovered, and returned to the People & Tribes they have
- injured. The A.B.A.’s, and I.B.A.’s membership, then, MUST
- work off the unrecoverable debts, either through forced
- imprisonment, and/or hard labor, which, as “Public-anuses,”
- none of A.B.A.’s, or the I.B.A.’s members are accustomed to.
- 26. The A.B.A.’s national headquarters are in Chicago, Illinois;
- it also maintains a significant branch office in Washington,
- D.C.. The I.B.A.‘s Corporate Offices are located in the City/
- State of London, England. These physical public & private
- properties & assets are to be vacated, and returned to the
- People, from whom, the capital funds used to build these
- centers of profit & houses of unjust enrichments, were
- pirated, pillaged, and stolen. Turning these physical, brick
- & mortar, assets into centers of knowledge, as in libraries &
- monuments for the People, would be the Lien Claimant’s
- recommendation.
- 27. The A.B.A., by its own admissions & postings, "provides law
- school accreditation, continuing legal education, information
- about the law, programs to assist lawyers and judges in their
- work, and initiatives to improve the legal system for the
- public. The Mission of the American Bar Association is to be
- the national representative (MONOPOLY) of the legal
- 24
- profession, serving the public, and the profession by
- promoting justice, professional excellence, and respect for
- the law." Is this true? Yes? or No?
- 28. The genuine Truth of the matter, is that, the A.B.A., the
- I.B.A., the D.O.J., nor any of their individual officers, or
- members, have any genuine “respect for the law,” as evident in
- their behaviors, conduct, and the following Oath of Office
- requirement, pursuant 28 USC #453, taken by thousands of their
- “Administrative Clerks” posing as “judges”, and “magistrates;”
- “I, ___ ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will
- administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal
- right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully
- and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent
- upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United
- States. So help me God.”
- 28. This Oath does NOT say, “under the legal system, or corporate
- body politic.” NOR does it say, “the United States of
- America, Inc.,” as semantically devised, created, lobbied,
- legislated, or executed, by the individual members of the
- A.B.A., or the I.B.A.. And, yet, to swear, under Oath, and
- under the Penalty of Perjury, “So help me God,” is, by all
- defintions, “Perjury,” wherein, the A.B.A.’s & I.B.A.’s
- practices & conduct in “denying God,” is clearly evident in
- every A.B.A. courtroom in America, and in every, single,
- revenue-bearing, statute, code, rule, ordinance, and every,
- single, color of law enacted in both the Public & Private
- Record.
- 25
- 29. It stands to reason, then, and as a point of accepted &
- universal Truth, that each & every Oath prescribed, given,
- taken, filed, recorded, monetized, and securitized, and
- placed into commerce, by every justice and judge, is a false
- & fabricated statement, intended to obstruct free trade &
- commerce, and is, well beyond any reasonable doubt, a written
- confession to sedition & treason, taken/given in an “open
- court of law.” It is, also, a willing & premeditated act of
- Treason, and commercial fraud, against the Continental united
- States of America, against its Constitutions, and against its
- residents & inhabitants, pursuant Article III, Section #3 of
- the Constitution. The BAR’s ignorance of the law shall be NO
- excuse, and it is NOT a valid reason for the commission of a
- crime, when the law is easily and readily available to anyone
- making a reasonable effort to study the law. Would you agree
- that these Oaths are acts of Sedition & Treason, and that,
- the judgments handed down at the Nuremberg Trials against
- those stating, “I was just following orders,” were just &
- accurate? Yes? or No?
- 30. The “legal definition” of the term “Public,” according to
- Black’s Law Dictionary (Eighth Edition), reads; “1. Relating
- or belonging to an entire community, state, or nation [Cases:
- Municipal Corporations ℇℇ 1557-1559.] 2. Open or available to
- all to use, share, or enjoy. 3. (Of a company) having shares
- that are available on the open market. [Corporations]. Do
- you agree with this “legal definition?” Yes? or No? If No,
- please provide the BAR’s corporate definition.
- 31. The “legal definition” of the term “publican,” has its
- origins in the Latin term, “publicanus,” which comes from
- “Hist. Roman Law,” and means, “A tax collector. A publicanus
- 26
- was described as “a farmer of the public revenue,” although
- the publicanus reaped only the money from that sown by the
- labor of others.” Would you agree with this Black’s Law
- Dictionary definition? Yes? or No? If No, please provide the
- Republican Party’s definition.
- 32. The definition of the term LEGAL. “the undoing of God’s Law.”
- 1893 Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, Encyclopedia
- Britannica; a dictionary of arts, sciences and general
- literature/ The R. S. Peale 9th 1893. God’s Law is also known
- as “Natural Law,” and Natural Law is the foundation for
- “Commercial Law,” wherein, “the Truth bounds all contracts.”
- Does the A.B.A., the I.B.A., or the D.O.J., then, promote &
- support the “undoing of God’s Law”? Yes? or No? If No,
- please identify, describe, and explain who you serve.
- 33. Following this definition, what does the A.B.A., the I.B.A.,
- or the D.O.J., actually produce in real labor, or in benefits
- for the people, other than non-productive, self-serving, job
- programs for its own members, and its affiliated corporations
- & contractors, such as the I.R.S., J.P. Morgan Chase, Wells
- Fargo Bank, Citicorp, and its privately-controlled &
- administrated for-profit jail & prison systems? Please be
- specific in your answers!
- 34. According to the Northern Trust Corporation documents
- obtained from the Federal Securities & Exchange Commission,
- the Bar, a.k.a. “The A.B.A.” is the very same corporation as
- the Internal Revenue Service, and that, the A.B.A. owns Wells
- Fargo Bank, J.P. Morgan Chase, Citicorp, and a host of Fortune
- 500 companies. Are these documents correct? Yes? or No? If
- No, please provide the documents that show anything different.
- 27
- 35. If your answer to #34 is “Yes,” does this NOT present an
- incredibly serious “Conflict of Interest” for the A.B.A., the
- I.B.A., and the D.O.J., pursuant to their very own corporate
- laws prohibiting such misconduct, fraud, and
- misrepresentation, when the I.R.S. issues fraudulent mortgage
- foreclosure liens against living inhabitants of the Land, and
- the A.B.A.’s membership, which includes Attorney Generals,
- District Attorneys, prosecuting attorneys, and/or defense
- attorneys, re-presents the I.R.S. in these kangaroo court
- cases, and where the Administrative Clerks, a.k.a. “bankruptcy
- judges” adjudicating over such matters are, also, members of
- the A.B.A.? Yes? or No? If No, please explain why you believe
- such “Conflicts of Interest” should be accepted as “Truth in
- Commerce.”
- 36. If the answer to #35 is “No,” please present the law, or
- even the “legal statute,” which gives any A.B.A., the D.O.J.,
- or any I.B.A. member the privilege & right to criminally
- usurp, subvert, obstruct commerce, or to deprive, the
- Unlienable & Natural Rights of any living individual of land
- ownership on the land. Please be very specific in your
- answer.
- 37. The A.B.A., and the I.B.A., as “political organizations,”
- are two of the most powerful political lobbying organizations
- within the City/State of Washington, D.C., Brussels, The
- Hague, the Vatican, and in each of the 50 states, wherein, the
- A.B.A., and the I.B.A., and their subsidiary corporations,
- have an unprecedented “financial interest” in all national &
- state government agencies, when the A.B.A., I.B.A., and the
- 28
- D.O.J., create, draft, construct, present, and instruct,
- elected & appointed government officials & agents of these
- Nation/States, including the Federal & State quasi-government
- agencies, on how best to execute these revenue-bearing
- statutes, codes, rules, ordinances, and a broad mix of “colors
- of law,” from which the A.B.A., the I.B.A., the D.O.J., its
- members, and/or their affiliate corporate shell franchises,
- are awarded lucrative corporate-government contracts involving
- the embezzlement of taxpayer sureties & treasuries, and the
- execution & enforcement of their copyrighted & legislated
- statutes, codes, rules, etc.. Is this an accurate assessment
- of the A.B.A.’s, and I.B.A.’s “financial interests,” their
- actual lobbying power & efforts used by its individual &
- corporate executives, officers, members, and contractors?
- Yes? or No? If No, please explain what your true “financial
- interests” are.
- 38. Once, again, with such broad legislative & executive powers
- to enforce these revenue-bearing statutes, codes, rules, and
- ordinances, does this NOT abrogate those very limited
- Constitutional powers delegated to the Judiciary by the united
- States, and the people, and do they NOT violate the A.B.A.’s ,
- and I.B.A.‘s very own Corporate Charters, their Policies,
- Procedures, Bylaws, and Professional Codes of Conduct? Yes?
- or No?
- 39. As the “Principals (Individuals)” behind the A.B.A.’s, and
- I.B.A.’s “financial interests,” lobbying, legislating, and the
- execution of these revenue-bearing statutes, codes, and
- ordinances, and with all Federal & State Law Enforcement
- officials now being under the control of the A.B.A., a.k.a.
- 29
- “DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,” or the I.B.A.’s “INTERPOL,” does this
- NOT make these Law Enforcers culpable, responsible as
- “Accessories after the fact,” and “parties to fraud,
- and voluntary, or “conscripted parties” to the null & void
- contracts,” and does this NOT directly implicate the agents,
- employees, and contractors, as criminal co-conspirators of the
- A.B.A.’s, and I.B.A.’s Corporations? Yes? or No? If No,
- please explain why law enforcement officers are NOT, more
- truthfully & accurately, referred to as “Legal Enforcement
- Officers.”
- 40. If you answered “Yes” to Question #39, are you attesting,
- then, that the A.B.A., and the I.B.A., have “financial
- interests” in all elected, selected, and appointed Law
- Enforcement officials, and that, these individuals have, inconcert,
- whether “voluntarily,” or “conscripted,” and under a
- myriad of “colors of law,” committed voter & election fraud
- under the presumptions & misrepresentations, that the People
- have been dooped & hoodwinked into believing they have any
- type of say over who they may elect, select, or appoint? Yes?
- or No? If No, please explain how the A.B.A., and the D.O.J.,
- were able to obtain their consent, and maintain the compliance
- of these public servants.
- 41. Such reckless behaviors & “criminal presumptions,” then, can
- be easily construed by any competent, and properly convened &
- seated common law jury of the people, as forms of extortive
- racketeering, hijacking, and the piracy of the People’s voter
- & election systems, along with the press-ganging of the
- People’s public servants, the piracy & seizures of the
- People’s lands & labors, and the destruction of the People’s
- 30
- Unlienable & Natural Rights, for the exclusive benefit, use,
- and pleasure of the members of the BAR, and the banking elite.
- Would this be a correct assessment & assertion? Yes? or No?
- If No, please explain how you believe these acts to be civil &
- just in any society, or culture.
- 42. Given the heavy “contractual & commercial nature” of your
- debt money system, your high-priced lobbying, your
- “legalized,” and copyrighted legislations, and the excessive
- use of force in executing your revenue-bearing statutes,
- codes, rules, ordinances, and other colors of law, by those
- ‘allegedly’ elected, selected, and appointed Law Enforcement
- agents, who were, in fact, duelly sworn under Oath to protect
- & serve the State & Federal Constitutions, does this NOT
- present a very serious, and Tortious “Conflict of Interest,”
- and a major “misrepresentation” by the individual/corporate
- members of the A.B.A., the I.B.A., and their “contractors?”
- Yes? or No? If No, please provide the lawful Constitution(s)
- your contractors actually operate under.
- 43. Would you NOT agree, that these criminal acts are, equally,
- violative of the “Supreme Laws of Land,” and the A.B.A.’s, and
- the I.B.A.’s, very own Corporate Charters, along with
- violating each & every commercial filing & registry of your
- corporate subsidiary’s “Articles of Incorporation” on public
- record in each nation, and in each of our 50 states of
- America? Yes? or No?
- 44. Given the Maxim of Law, which states, “NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
- IS NOTICE TO AGENT, AND NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO
- PRINCIPAL,” does it NOT follow, then, the terms & conditions
- 31
- drawn in the Commercial Obligation Lien processes, that, any &
- all of A.B.A.’s, and I.B.A.’s executives, officers, directors,
- employees, agents, and their contractors, ie; Government
- “Legal Enforcement Agents,” are violating the terms &
- conditions set forth under law, and they are all, presently,
- operating in commercial dishonor & default? Yes? or No? If
- No, please provide the Laws of Commerce, which give the A.B.A,
- the I.B.A., and the D.O.J., the authority to operate outside &
- above these Maxims of Law.
- 45. This means, then, any & all A.B.A., I.B.A., and D.O.J.
- executives, officers, directors, employees, agents, and
- contractors, are lawfully & “legally” prohibited from
- approaching, engaging, or contacting, any & all witnesses,
- informants, or crime victims, who, under the “injurious
- presumptions” of being “lost at sea,” “left on the
- battlefield,” or are “dead estates,” but who are, in fact,
- genuine, Living beings, residents, and inhabitants on the
- Land, Territories, and/or Colonial Districts. This
- PROHIBITION exists until the terms & conditions of this
- Commercial Obligation Lien (Agriculture Lien), pursuant 15
- USC, are satisfied in full. Would you NOT agree? Yes? or No?
- If No, please provide the “Natural Law” that gives you the
- privilege, and the right, to harass, intimidate, coerce,
- assault, detain, arrest, incarcerate, imprison, or punish, a
- genuine Living being.
- 46. Inasmuch; This Commercial Lien, a.k.a. “Agricultural Lien,”
- is, also, to be received & considered a Writ of Injunction &
- Restraint against the A.B.A., the I.B.A., and the D.O.J.,
- along with a formal & official order by the People to CEASE &
- 32
- DESIST with all violations & crimes against humanity,
- including, but NOT limited to, ending the lobbying, bribery,
- influencing, scripting, construction, drafting, legislating,
- executing, or profiting from any & all revenue-bearing
- statutes, codes, rules, ordinances, or any other “color of
- law” enactments in, or from, any house of the people’s
- lawfully constituted government agencies, congresses,
- commission, or collective venues. Do you agree that these
- demands & claims for remedy are warranted, lawful, and just?
- Yes? or No? If No, please explain why you should not Cease &
- Desist with these activities.
- 47. If your answer, or response, to Questions #45 & #46, is
- “No,” please reconsider 18 USC, #3771, wherein, every Living
- resident, and inhabitant of the Land, has been, and is,
- either, a “Witness,” or a “Crime Victim” of the A.B.A., the
- I.B.A., and the D.O.J., and as such, they are entitled to
- protection by their dejure & defacto US Marshal Services, the
- Civilian Provost Marshal, the dejure Military, and their own
- County Sheriffs, wherein, these officers are held to their
- “dejure contracts in commerce,” and they are under their very
- own Oaths of Office to protect “Witnesses,” and “Crime
- Victims,” and to serve, both, State & Federal Constitutions,
- with all revenue-bearing statutes, codes, rules, ordinances,
- and other colors of law, NOTWITHSTANDING! Are these NOT the
- obligations & duties of the US Marshals & County Sheriffs
- stated, defined & described under your very own statutes,
- codes, etc.? Yes? or No?
- 48. Having invoked 18 USC #3771, which is, clearly, a lawful &
- righteous derivative of the Continental united States
- 33
- Constitution’s prohibitions & constraints, all “witnesses,”
- and “crime victims” are guaranteed due process under the
- Supreme Laws of the Land, the Law of Nations, International
- Laws, Commercial Law, Natural Law, and under the Universal
- Declaration of Human Rights, proper remedy & recourse for
- their injuries, particularly, when these guarantees &
- protections have been intentionally & willfully obstructed,
- subverted, misrepresented, and/or totally denied by those
- charged & tasked with providing these guarantees &
- protections. Would you NOT agree? Yes? or No? If No, please
- provide the Law that gives your “Legal Enforcement Agents” the
- rights & privileges to operate outside of, or above, the Law.
- 49. There are THIRTY (30) Articles in the Universal Declaration
- of Human Rights. Of these Articles, which Article, or
- Articles, does the A.B.A., the I.B.A., or the D.O.J., support,
- and which Article, or Articles, does the A.B.A., the I.B.A.,
- or the D.O.J., reject? Please be specific in your answers.
- 50. The entities, Agents, and Individuals, that are listed above
- as Lien Debtors, by their own admissions, records, actions,
- inactions, omissions, malfeasance, misconduct, or pure
- negligence, prove, well beyond any reasonable doubt, that they
- are, at the very least, “guilty” of criminally violating Title
- 15 USC 1 & 2, a host of Title 18 USC violations, including,
- but not limited to; Title 18 USC 241, 242, Title 22 USC
- (Foreign Registrations Act), Title 26 USC, Title 28 USC, and
- numerous violations of trust & breach of contract under Title
- 42 USC 1983. Is this NOT a correct assessment? Yes? or No?
- If No, please provide the Law, or Laws, which would give you
- protection, or immunity, from such charges.
- 34
- 51. With the Lien Claimants, and other injured parties, having
- invoked these laws, derivative codifications, protections &
- immunites, each & every law & code MUST, then, in a point-bypoint,
- article-by-article, be protested, argued, and/or
- rebutted, in an Affidavit of the Truth, and taken under Oath,
- that these protests, arguments, and rebuttals, are the Truth,
- the whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth, under the Penalty
- of Perjury. If you are willing & capable of doing so, you are
- being given NINETY (90) DAYS in which to answer these charges
- & allegations? Do you understand? Yes? or No? If No, what
- elements of these charges & allegations do you NOT understand?
- 52. Again, under the terms & conditions set forth in Commercial
- & Natural Law, the above mentioned Lien Debtors have NINETY
- (90) DAYS in which to respond, protest, or rebut, this
- International Commercial Obligation Lien & Affidavit, and to
- return same via USPS Certified/Registered Mail to each Lien
- Claimant listed. Failure to do so, will result in an
- immediate “Asset Forfeiture & Seizure” of the “Accounts
- Payable” of TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY-NINE TRILLION
- ($279,000,000,000,000) US GOLD DOLLARS, currently held by the
- A.B.A., and the I.B.A., pursuant U.S. Codes UCC-9/102
- (Agricultural Liens), and UCC 9/607-610 (Secured Party’s Right
- to take possession after default). Do you understand these
- terms & conditions? Yes? or No? If No, please state what
- terms & conditions you do NOT understand.
- 53. A perfected & cured Lien also commands the recovery of the
- “Accounts Receivable,” pursuant to 12 USC #411 mandates &
- guidelines, for each Affiant and Lien Claimant, who, by the
- 35
- endowed proxy of this Claim for Remedy, a.k.a. “Commercial
- Obligation Lien,” and their Affidavit, will, under Oath, act
- in the capacity of an Administrator, Creditor, Beneficiary,
- and Grantor, in the assignment of a qualified “Authorized
- Agent,” or Agents, for the “redistribution” of the “Accounts
- Receivables,” (ie; all laundered, pirated, and stolen assets,
- monies & properties), and to restore same to any & all injured
- parties, individuals, “witnesses,” and “crime victims” of the
- A.B.A., the I.B.A., and the D.O.J., their Ponzi Franchise
- Corporations, and their subcontractors.
- PROOF OF ALLEGATIONS:
- 1. The “PROOF OF ALLEGATIONS” lies directly at the feet of the
- individual Officers & Crew of the A.B.A., the I.B.A., and the
- D.O.J., ie; their Administrators, Executives, Officers,
- Directors, Employees, Agents, and Contractors, and with their
- honor, willingness, and their ability, to respond, protest,
- argue, or rebut the allegations made, herein, point-by-point,
- and article-by-article, under an Affidavit of Truth, under
- sworn Oath, and under the Penalty of Perjury.
- 2. It is anticipated & expected, that these individual members &
- contractors of the A.B.A., the I.B.A., and the D.O.J., rather
- than admit to their crimes against humanity, in-writing, will
- choose to go silent, or simply invoke the Fifth Amendment of
- the US Constitution, which, again, is NOT open to ANY A.B.A.,
- I.B.A., or D.O.J. member, agent, employee, or contractor.
- 3. Their acquiescence, or silence, then, will, under the weight
- of Commercial Law & Natural Law, result in their waiving all
- 36
- of their corporate, public, private, and individual rights &
- immunities, as per 28 USC #455, and they will, also, be
- attesting to their acceptance & agreement to all allegations
- made, to accept all fines, fees, penalties & punishments they
- are deserving of, and entitled to, under Common Law, the Law
- of Merchants, International Law, Commercial Law, Natural Law,
- and to have violated their very own corporate laws & selfengineered
- codifications, which are grounds for the immediate
- dissolution of their corporate charters. Are these terms &
- conditions clear to you? Yes? or No?
- LEDGERING AND TRUE BILL:
- 1. The ledger for this “TRUE BILL” is based on the Truth, the
- whole Truth, nothing but the Truth, and upon the MONETARY FACE
- VALUE of TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY-NINE TRILLION
- ($279,000,000,000,000.) US GOLD DOLLARS retrievable from
- stolen & pirated properties & assets, pursuant 12 USC #411,
- believed to be of record, and all properties & assets
- suspected of being hidden in privatized off shore properties &
- accounts by various individuals & members the AMERICAN BAR
- ASSOCIATION, and the INTERNATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION.
- 2. These stolen & pirated “assets” and “properties” will be
- confirmed & verified by a People’s open, complete &
- independent audit of the Federal Reserve Bank, and an audit of
- the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
- 3. This “TRUE BILL” is, also, set against the MAXIMUM PUBLIC
- HAZARD BONDS/INSURANCES held by the A.B.A.‘s, and the I.B.A.’s
- Bonding Companies, whether “in-house,” or “independent,” for
- 37
- all of these Entities, Agents, and Individuals, including, but
- NOT limited to, the individual Lien Debtors listed above.
- 4. As a Commercial Instrument, this “TRUE BILL” has an S.E.C.
- Tracer Number of #2640220, which is the Reception No.#
- assigned by the Mesa County Colorado Deputy Clerk & Recorder,
- Brandy Emow, for the filing of the fraudulent, fictitious, and
- fabricated Oath of Office signed by Colorado’s 21st Judicial
- District Crown Administrative Clerks, Craig P. Henderson, and
- David A. Bottger, and witnessed by Sandra Casselberry, the
- Judicial Administrator for Mesa County, Colorado.
- 5. This S.E.C. Tracer Number of #2640220 is a “commercial
- securities tag,” and is but a single Exhibit, out of
- thousands, of the prima facie evidence of the A.B.A.‘s
- conspiracy to commit sedition, piracy, and commercial fraud,
- against the Lien Claimants, and against the American people,
- wherein, any such Oath “prescribed, given, taken,”
- commercially securitized & monetized, was, and is, a “solemn
- mockery,” and “equally a crime,” according to the Crown’s very
- own Supreme Court ruling by US Supreme Court Chief Justice,
- John Marshal, in 1803.
- 6. This S.E.C. Tracer Number of #2640220, as related to this
- Commercial Obligation Lien, may be used as form of
- identification for any & all “Witnesses,” “Crime Victims,”
- and/or “injured parties,” when asked for identification by any
- A.B.A., I.B.A., or D.O.J. contractor, or revenue/tax collector
- (“Pulbicanus”), (ie; I.R.S. Agent, H.L.S. Agent, F.B.I. Agent,
- C.I.A. Agent, Sheriff, Sheriff Deputy, Police Officer, etc.).
- 7. All such “Crown Contractors” are, under the terms & conditions
- of this International Commercial Obligation Lien/Agricultural
- Lien/Writ of Injunction & Restraint/Cease & Desist Order,
- 38
- prohibited from engaging with, detaining, arresting,
- incarcerating, harrassing, coercing, or intimidating, any
- “Witness,” “Crime Victim,” a.k.a. “any Living Being,” or
- citing same under any revenue-bearing statute, code, rule,
- ordinance, or any other “color of law” infraction, providing
- the Living Being has NOT harmed or injured another Living
- Being. [Corporations CANNOT be injured! Only Living Beings
- can be injured!] Without an “injury,” there can be NO crime,
- and NOWHERE can these revenue-bearing statutes adhere, and no
- “false presumptions of a crime” shall be made, authorized, or
- enforced!
- 8. Any encroachments, or violations, upon the terms & conditions
- stated above by any “Crown Officer,” “Crown Agent,” or “Crown
- Contractor,” will result in additional 15 USC penalties being
- levied upon the corporate, personal, and private properties &
- assets of these individual “Officers,” “Agents,” or
- “Contractors,” while operating privately, or in their
- “corporate capacities.”
- 9. This S.E.C. Tracer Number of #2640220, however, and wherever,
- presented, will serve as the People’s Rescission of Consent,
- and as fair, proper, and lawful notice to CEASE & DESIST with
- any & all criminal aggressions, trespasses, and
- transgressions, while operating on the Land, and/or under the
- ‘presumed & alleged’ jurisdiction, power, or authority of the
- Military/Admiralty Flag of the Crown Templar.
- SURETY & CERTIFICATION:
- The Sureties & Certifications of, and for, any & all Corporate,
- Public, Personal, or Private Accounts, Bonds, Securities,
- 39
- Profits, Procedes, Fixtures, Chattels, and Assets owned/managed
- by ANY individual operating within the jurisdiction, or control,
- of the A.B.A., the I.B.A., the D.O.J., or their, “in-house,”
- Bonding Companies, under the indirect, or direct control of the
- A.B.A., or the I.B.A., their Nation/State franchises, Inns of
- the Court, The Federal Reserve Banking System, or The
- International Monetary Fund (IMF) for these Entities, Agents and
- Individuals, are all considered forfeitable assets, and as “debt
- obligations” to the Lien Claimants, their assigns, and/or their
- heirs. As such, the Lien Debtors are lawfully responsible for
- producing, upon this commercial demand, these Sureties,
- Accounts, Financial Statements, and all Certificates of
- Liability & Indenture.
- ENFORCEMENT:
- 1. The Affiants & Lien Claimants, without prejudice, and
- Reserving All Rights, declares this Commercial Obligation Lien
- to be self-effecting, self-evident, and self-enforcing, noting
- that the US Marshal Service, is now lawfully restored to the
- People’s Executive Branch of the Continental united States of
- America, and they are no longer contractually obligated to the
- A.B.A.’s subsidiary corporation of the Department of Justice,
- both of which, are, hereby, dissolved for by the People for
- cause, and by necessity.
- 2. The US Marshal Service, a Constitutional Law Enforcement
- Agency, and NO LONGER a “Legal Enforcement Agency,” in the
- State of Illinois, and elsewhere throughout the 50 States,
- Washington, D.C., and their 94 government offices, will be
- tasked & charged with executing the seizing, freezing, and
- recovery of all the A.B.A.’s, and the I.B.A.’s corporate,
- 40
- public, personal, and private properties, found upon the Land,
- at sea, or found to be held by any & all individuals operating
- under the A.B.A., or the I.B.A., until such time, as it is
- determined that the full face amount of this Commercial
- Obligation Lien can be satisfied, and that all other Claims
- for Remedy made, herein, are unconditionally satisfied in
- full.
- 3. The US Marshals, having been given the preponderance of
- evidence, and probable causes stated, herein, that crimes have
- been committed, and that, crimes are being committed, shall
- under their own authority, jurisdiction, and powers, as dejure
- Marshals & Sheriffs, commence, IMMEDIATELY, with serving
- Notice of this Writ of Injunction & Restraint/Cease & Desist,
- without the need of a court order, or warrant, as is their
- privilege, duty, and obligation, under Law.
- 4. On the NINETY-FIRST (91st) DAY after receipt of this Lien, the
- US Marshals & Interpol, are to commence, at once, with the
- freezing, forfeiture, and seizing, of all corporate, personal,
- public, private, and individual properties, accounts, and
- assets, known to be in the possession of, or under control of,
- the A.B.A., I.B.A., D.O.J., and/or any & all of their
- corporate contractors, however related.
- 5. Fair compensation shall be made for the anticipated expenses &
- services rendered by these agents, and for their abiding by
- their own Oaths of Office (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/
- text/28/563). The US Marshal Service & Interpol will receive
- TWENTY(20%) of the recovered assets, and these funds will be
- divided equally. A Promissory Note shall be tendered to the
- dejure United States Treasury, and earmarked to the US Marshal
- Service & Interpol in this amount. The full face amount of
- 41
- the Promissory Note will be made payable to the US Marshal
- Service & Interpol immediately upon the successful recovery,
- reclamation, and return, of the Lien Claimant’s “Accounts
- Receivables.”
- 6. Should it ever be miscontrued, or misrepresented, that this
- Promissory Note, and/or payments made to the US Marshal
- Service & Interpol, is some form of bribery, the Lien
- Claimants shall argue & deny same, and declare these funds
- lawful & appropriate compensation for the tasks & expenses the
- US Marshals & Interpol are tasked & charged with. These funds
- constitute stolen & pirated properties & assets of the
- American people, and these compensations are to be considered
- “bounties,” “prizes,” and “rewards” for honest service by the
- people’s law enforcement agencies & agents.
- 42
- LIEN CLAIMANT’S CERTIFICATION/OATH & AFFIRMATION:
- I,_______________________________, a living, breathing, being, a
- Natural inhabitant of the Land, and who is of the age of the majority,
- and NOT a child, and who has NOT been found lost at sea, or left on
- the battlefield, am competent in commerce to certify on my own
- unlimited commercial liability, that I have read the above Affidavit
- of Obligation, and do know the contents to be true, correct, complete
- and not misleading of the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the
- truth, and do believe that the above described acts have been
- committed contrary to the Supreme Laws cited, defined, described,
- herein.
- " " " " " ! ! _____________________________
- ! ! ! ! ! ! :House & Family of________________
- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Date:_____/_____/_____
- As First & Second Witnesses to the content of this Affidavit, and to
- the Living Character & red-inked, blood signature of Affiant,and Lien
- Claimant, I attest to both as being true in material fact, and both
- were done without malice, contempt, the intent to defraud, or to evade
- the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
- ! ! ! ! ! ! ____________________________
- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Witness/Beneficiary
- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Date:_____/_____/_____
- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! _____________________________
- ! ! ! ! ! ! Witness/Beneficiary
- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Date:_____/_____/_____
- 43
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
- BE IT KNOWN TO ALL MEN, the Affiant shall post this Commerical
- Obligation Lien to the Public Record with a filing to the united
- State’s Secretary of State, and Colorado’s Secretary of State,
- and make every attempt of service to the Principals, via USPS
- Certified Mail, with Return Receipt Requested, noting that
- NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE PRINCIPAL, and that, NOTICE TO
- PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT(S). INASMUCH, the Affiant is NOT
- responsible for the qualification of service to each & every
- Lien Debtor, as AGENTS MUST NOTIFY PRINCIPALS, AND PRINCIPALS
- MUST NOTIFY AGENTS. THIS INCLUDES THE A.B.A.‘S, AND THE
- I.B.A.’S BONDING AGENTS & ENTITIES CHARGED WITH THE BONDING &
- INSURING OF SURETIES OF THEIR CLIENTS.
- USPS CERTIFIED MAIL REGISTRY NO.#’S:
- ______ ______ ______ ______ ______
- ______ ______ ______ ______ ______
- ______ ______ ______ ______ ______
- ______ ______ ______ ______ ______
- ______ ______ ______ ______ ______
- ______ ______ ______ ______ ______
- 44
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement