Every spekr question:

Each individual enjoys bodily autonomy and have rights that no other individual or group may violate
- Agree

Individuals have the freedom to to decide what they knowingly and volountarily consume
- Disagree

Slavery is acceptable in certain circumstances, such as punishment for a crime
- Neutral

Freedom of expression should be unhindered by the gov.
- Strongly agree

Hate speech should be banned
- Disagree

The control of comms. by gov. is necassary to prevent the spread of dangerous ideas
- Strongly disagree

Provision of the internet should be socialized and made free of charge
- Strongly agree

People should be free to engage in or abstain from religious activities that do not violate others' rights
- Strongly agree

Blasphemy laws should be reinstated
- Disagree

Government should neither aid nor attack any religion
- Agree

Religious orgs. should not be exempt from taxes
- Agree

"You have nothing to hide if you have nothing to fear" is valid
- Disagree

Government transparency is vital to ensuring accountability
- Strongly agree

Gov. surveilance should be expanded to combat terrorism
- Neutral

People should be secure in their persons, homes, property, and communications
- Agree but what the fuck that is too vague

In order to solve crimes, the police need to search/seize without consent or warrent
- Theoretically agree but practically strongly disagree

Sexual orientation, gender, etc should not impact gov. treatment of individuals
- Strongly agree

Gov. should have the authority to define, license, or restrict personal relationships
- Strongly disagree

Consenting adults should be free to choose their sex. practices and relationships
- Strongly agree

Access to abortion should be regulated by gov.
- agree in the opposite way than expected (e.g. in healthcare reg. way), so put disagree

Criminal laws should be limited to violation of rights of others
- Agree, more or less

"No victim, no crime" is a valid statement
- Agree

Banned medicinal and rec. drugs should remain illegal
- Disagree, mostly

Police, ambulance, fire, etc should be provided by market
- Strongly disagree

Individuals who volountarily assume themselves risk of harm are a burden and such behavior should be banned
- Neutral

Restitution should be paid to victims at expense of wrongdoer
- Agree

Rights and due process are relics of the past and only interfere with convictions
- Theoretically agree, practically strongly disagree

Juries should be able to judge not only facts but also the justice of law
- disagree

Dispute resolution cannot be effectively provided by market and thus needs gov.
- Agree

Prisons, as they currently exist, should be abolished
- Slightly agree

The only legit. use of force is in defence of individual rights against aggression
- Too vague

All people have a right to self-defence and may agree to be aided by any others
- neutral

Individuals do not have a right to keep and bear arms
- slightly agree

People should be prosecuted for using right to self-defence
- Disagree

Private property owners should be free to set rules with regard to weapons on property
- too vague

Gov. should restrict and monitor manufacture, ownership, and transfer of guns/ammunition
- Agree

Respect for private property is fundamental to a free and prosperous society
- Disagree

Contracts to obtain, retain, profit from, manage, or dispose of one's private property should be regulated
- Slightly agree

Private property owners have the right to control and enjoy their property if not infringing on rights of others
- Disagree

Eminent domain and civil forfiture should be abolished
- Disagree

In order to protect poor form rich, limits on profits, production mandates, and controls on prices are needed
- Strongly agree

For volountary dealings, parties should be able to trade with whomever they want on mutually agreeable terms
- disagree

Private landowners do not have an incentive to maintain natural resources and need reg.
- strongly agree

To prevent gov. pollution and misuse of land, public land should be made private
- Strongly disagree

Protecting the environment requires that resources like land, air, water, etc be held in common and private ownership restricted
- Strongly agree

The profit motive stifles innovations and changes needed to protect the environment, requiring intervention
- Strongly agree

Environment advocates and social pressure are more effective than gov. intervention
- Strongly disagree

Subsides for energy production should be abolished
- Energy production should be public in first place

Energy pricing, allocation, production are too important to be left to market and need gov. control
- Strongly agree

People who think they are entitled to keep what they earn are merely being selfish and should be made to pay their share
- Agree

"Taxation is the price we pay for civilazation" is valid
- Strongly agree

Gov budgets should be balanced by curbing expendature and not raising taxes
- disagree

People should be free to choose what products and services they want to purchase and not be forced to pay
- agree in theory, but disagree with the implication here and this is also super vague

Free market banking is preferable to central
- Disagree

Profits and losses should be socialized
- Strongly agree

Individuals who engage in volountary exchange should be able to use anything as currency
- agree somewhat

Inflationary money policies and legal tender laws should be banned
- disagree

Money should be abolished
- Agree

Individuals have the right to form corps., coops., and other types of entities based on volountary association
- Slightly disagree

Private ownership of means of production should be abolished
- Agree

Subsides and bailouts to buisnesses, labour, and other special interests should be abolished
- They should probably be public in the first place, but practically in the current system somewhat agree more or less

Public entities should be able to compete with private
- agree (practically)

Employment and compensation agreements between employers and employees should be private
- Strongly disagree

Private employers and employees should be required to bargain through a labour union
- Theoretically disagree, practically agree

Membership in a labor union should be required for obtaining employment
- Theoretically disagree, practically agree

Compulsory arbitration and laws to bargain are needed to prevent worker exploitation
- Agree

Provision of edu. should be made free
- Strongly agree

Education is best provided by the free market
- Strongly disagree

The education of children is the financial responsibility of the parents, not gov.
- Disagree

Health insurance companies exploit the sick to make a profit and thus need regulation
- Strongly agree

Individuals should be free to determine what level of health insurance they want, if any
- Strongly disagree by implication

Health care should be provided by free market
- Strongly disagree

Suicide and euthanasia should be illegal
- Slightly disagree

Provision of healthcare should be socialized and made free
- Strongly agree

Pension for retirement
- Strongly agree

Socialized welfare should be replaced with private charity
- Strongly disagree

Welfare services needed to combat poverty
- Strongly agree

Charity and civil society will weaken without gov. direction ability
- Strongly agree

Gov. needs to act as policeman for world and embrace alliances
- Strongly disagree

Service in milatary should be required
- Strongly disagree

Rights are not inaleable and cannot be suspended during war
- Neutral

Intel. agencies would be obstructed from preserving security if subjected to transparency
- Technically agree, practically strongly disagree

Gov. should not use secret classifications to keep info from public that public should have
- Strongly agree

Foreign policy should seek to keep nation in position of strength relative to others
- Disagree

Foreign policy should emphasize defence against attack from abroad and enhance likelihood of peace by avoiding entanglements
- Strongly agree

Foreign intervention are necassary for preserving security of a nation
- Technically agree, practically disagree

All people have the right to resist tyranny and defend their rights
- agree

Impediments for free trade should be taken away
- strongly disagree

Policial freedom and escape from tyranny mean that individuals not be unreasonably constrained in border-crossing
- neutral

Trade should be regulated by gov.
- Strongly agree

Econ. freedom demands unrestricted movement of human and financial capital across borders
- Disagree

All people are born with right to life, liberty, and property
- Disagree

Some rights impose an obligation for others to fulfil them
- agree

Gov. should neither deny nor abridge rights based on bio. characteristics of prefs.
- strongly agree

members of private orgs can set standards of association and individuals are free to respond with boycott or whatever
- Strongly disagree with implicaiton

Parents/guardians should be able to raise children according to their beliefs
- Agree

Parents should be able to freely abuse or neglect their children
- Strongly disagree

Without the state there would be chaos or disorder
- Slightly agree

it's the right of individual to resist tyranny by abolishing and replacing it
- Agree

the state should be abolished
- disagree