Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- [11:43] <Luke-Jr> coblee: poke
- 02[11:44] * jeamy (~jeamy@80-110-44-54.static.surfer.at) Quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
- 06[11:45] * OneMiner popcorn
- [11:47] <@coblee> Luke-Jr: what's up?
- [11:48] <Luke-Jr> coblee: is there any chance you would be willing to shutdown litecoin, or request mtgox to not trade it, for the sake of Bitcoin?
- [11:48] <Luke-Jr> (pending further discussion of course)
- [11:48] <@coblee> Luke-Jr: you do know that no one (not even me) can shutdown a decentralized currency, right?
- [11:49] <iddo> Luke-Jr: it's good to test social behavior with litecoin, suppose for example that litecoin and all other alcoins didn't exist, and you
- invested in bitcoin, you wouldn't know what will happen to your invest when suddenly some new alt coin like litecoin would appear
- [11:49] <Luke-Jr> coblee: yes and no
- 02[11:50] * C0deMaver1ck (~C0deMaver@unaffiliated/beau/x-8351432) Quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
- [11:50] <Luke-Jr> iddo: the threat isn't litecoin per se, as much as it is MtGox trading litecoin
- [11:50] <iddo> coblee: maybe Luke has this in mind:
- http://www.reddit.com/r/litecoin/comments/1bf2l6/ask_for_litecoin_on_mtgox_and_on_every_other_btc/c96abou
- [11:50] <@coblee> and if somehow litecoin does die, some other alt coin will take its place
- [11:50] <@coblee> you should talk to MagicalTux instead then
- [11:50] <Luke-Jr> coblee: MagicalTux is not discussing it
- 03[11:50] * C0deMaver1ck (~C0deMaver@gravypod.lieks.the.mudkipz.ws) has joined #litecoin-dev
- 02[11:50] * C0deMaver1ck (~C0deMaver@gravypod.lieks.the.mudkipz.ws) Quit (Changing host)
- 03[11:50] * C0deMaver1ck (~C0deMaver@unaffiliated/beau/x-8351432) has joined #litecoin-dev
- [11:50] <@coblee> i thought it was just an april fools joke
- [11:51] <iddo> i think that it's just the marketing dept. of mtgox
- [11:51] <iddo> not sure about april fools, two people there said that they got same reply
- [11:51] <Luke-Jr> coblee: currently my only option is to coordinate a FPGA-based 51% shutdown; I'm hoping to find some other more friendly
- avenues
- [11:51] <[yAK]> https://data.mtgox.com/api/2/LTCUSD/money/ticker
- [11:51] <Graet> he is goxxing ltc, price has tripled since the gox announce - what will happen if he pulls support now? major crash....
- [11:51] <[yAK]> ^ ill just leave that there
- [11:51] <@coblee> might be a mtgox pump and dump. buy a ton of litecoins, announce rumor of supporting it, adnd dump
- [11:52] <iddo> seems more like standard marketing mumbojumbo
- [11:52] <Graet> Luke-Jr, how about not supporting scrypt in your miner - if you really want o do something....
- [11:52] <Luke-Jr> Graet: explain how that would change anything?
- [11:53] <iddo> Luke-Jr: do you have a rough estimate of the cost of that 51% FPGA attack?
- [11:53] <Graet> well seems strange you running around calling ltc a scam, aking coblee to take it down, but you support it in your miner....
- [11:53] <@coblee> Luke-Jr: I don't think you will be able to shut Litecoin down without losing a ton of money. And you'd only be able to do it
- temporarily. look at bbqcoin, it's back too
- [11:54] <Luke-Jr> coblee: it doesn't need to be shutdown permanently, just enough to make MtGox reconsider
- [11:54] <Luke-Jr> iddo: existing Bitcoin FPGAs are sufficient, just a matter of the right bitstreams
- 02[11:54] * rdponticelli (~rdpontice@200-081-044-238.wireless.movistar.net.ar) Quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
- [11:55] <iddo> Luke-Jr: how many FPGAs could you control?
- [11:55] <Luke-Jr> iddo: 10 FPGAs is enough to get 51%
- [11:55] <iddo> i doubt that figure
- [11:56] <Luke-Jr> admittedly, it's not proven in practice yet, but I doubt it would vary significantly
- [11:56] <@coblee> Luke-Jr: that's funny
- [11:56] <iddo> how much faster is a typical FPGA comapred to say 5970 ?
- [11:56] <Luke-Jr> coblee: ?
- [11:56] <@coblee> are you working on a script fpga?
- [11:56] <iddo> Luke-Jr: don't forget that a lot of GPU power is probably migrating to litecoin now, because of bitcoin ASICs
- [11:57] <Luke-Jr> coblee: I know multiple people who are thinking about it, and who are willing to take action to protect bitcoin
- [11:57] <@coblee> afaik, fpga are equivalent to gpus. maybe a bit more efticient
- [11:57] <iddo> there was forum post on scrypt FPGA, i don't remember if it was in final stage yet
- [11:57] <Graet> funny thing Luke-Jr - there are plenty of gpu miners that would jump over if you attacked....
- [11:58] <Graet> but really Luke-Jr stooping to altchain type wars isnt good fort bitcoin....
- [11:58] <@coblee> right now, you can make 5x the bitcoins mining litecoins: http://dustcoin.com/mining
- [11:58] <iddo> Luke-Jr: multiple people? i'm not aware of anyone else hostile to litecoin as much as you... who?
- [11:58] <@coblee> i'm sure a lot of gpu miners are switching over
- [11:58] <Luke-Jr> iddo: they'd prefer I take the backlash of course
- [11:59] <iddo> ok
- [11:59] <Luke-Jr> coblee: anyhow, back to the topic: are YOU willing to do anything to protect bitcoin?
- [11:59] <iddo> but you'll probably need 100s or 1000s of FPGAs, not 10
- [11:59] <iddo> Luke-Jr: i don't think that most people agree with your reasoning, the litecoin hurts bitcoin
- [12:00] <iddo> Luke-Jr: could you please explain why you disagree with the reason that i gave, about testing human behavior towards altcoins in
- order to get real price discovery for the value of bitcoin?
- [12:01] <iddo> s/the litecoin/that litecoin
- [12:02] <@coblee> Luke-Jr: I don't think Litecoin hurts Bitcoin
- [12:02] <Luke-Jr> iddo: again, the problem isn't litecoin as much as it is MtGox trading litecoin
- [12:02] <@coblee> if it did, i don't think btc will be at $100 today
- [12:02] <Graet> well fix gox, dont break litecoin
- [12:02] <Luke-Jr> litecoin is clearly a pump and dump scheme, and when it fails, the fact that *the* Bitcoin exchange was promoting it is going to
- reflect terrible on bitcoin
- [12:03] <Luke-Jr> people are going to just write off all cryptocurrency as pump & dump
- 03[12:03] * GordonG3kko (~GordonG3k@gateway/tor-sasl/gordong3kko) has joined #litecoin-dev
- [12:03] <iddo> ok now at least i understand your reasoning
- [12:03] <@coblee> Luke-Jr: no need to attack litecoin. quoting you: "the existing network effect of Bitcoin, combined with the lack of meaningful
- differentiation between Litecoin and Bitcoin and Litecoin's adoption of a "designed to fail" proof-of-work algorithm; that Litecoin is bound to fail in the
- end."
- [12:03] <Luke-Jr> even if you disagree with it being a scam, are you willing to stake Bitcoin on your opinion being right?
- [12:03] <@coblee> so in time, it will fail by itself. unless you don't believe your own lies on the wiki :)
- [12:04] <Luke-Jr> coblee: yes, it will. but with MtGox promoting it, it will kill ALL cryptocurrency at the same time
- [12:04] <iddo> you describe what possible scenario, you seem to be convinced that it's inevitable scenario, but most people (at least here) disagree
- [12:04] <iddo> s/what/one
- [12:04] <@coblee> Luke-Jr: i don't have a god complex such that I believe I have the power to kill or save bitcoin
- [12:04] <Luke-Jr> iddo: are you willing to bet Bitcoin's existence on that?
- [12:05] <Luke-Jr> s/existence/success/
- [12:05] <@coblee> mtgox promoting litecoin and litecoin failing will not kill bitcoin
- [12:05] <Luke-Jr> coblee: think about it, I gotta run to the airport and back
- [12:05] <iddo> Luke-Jr: i disagree with that dichotomy because i think that having litecoin is helpful for bitcoin
- [12:05] <@coblee> 1 exchange + 1 alt currency should not be able to kill bitcoin. if it does, then bitcoin had no chance from the start
- [12:05] <Luke-Jr> coblee: from the perspective of a normal person, who sees MtGox as the face of Bitcoin
- [12:06] <Graet> i agree with coblee , if bitcoin is that fragile its doomed to failure anyway
- [12:06] <@coblee> you're too short sighted. maybe it will hurt bitcoin a bit. like the mtgox hack caused it to drop to $2. but in the long term, bitcoin (and
- litecoin) will survive
- [12:06] <@coblee> anyways, i got to go. we can talk later if you want
- [12:06] <Luke-Jr> coblee: you're being (unrealistically) optimistic there..
- [12:07] <Luke-Jr> how can you be 100% certain litecoin will survive?
- [12:07] <@coblee> who's 100% certain of anything?
- [12:07] <iddo> Luke-Jr: maybe you should think about it from another perspective: if bitcoin cannot survive the litecoin (supposed) crash, then bitcoin
- is too weak to be allowed to exist?
- [12:07] <@coblee> iddo: exactly
- [12:07] <Luke-Jr> iddo: it is too weak today, yes
- [12:07] <Luke-Jr> bbiab
- [12:07] <@coblee> ok, later
- [12:08] <iddo> Luke-Jr: ok we can continue this discussion later:)
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment