==HOW TO READ P COMMS==
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1187547459700121600


Two sets of two synonyms or three mentions of a term = significant.
re: repeated 3x = signal (NOT noise)
Check the timestamps on the posts and tweets capitalization on his Twitter
41 - George H. W. Bush
43 - George W. Bush
brainlets = tripcode users
0 deltas tweets = comms open
look for spoopy drop, thundercat arrival and or 0delta QnA
Also, check the timestamp on the last one vs the first one, and think mirror.
During homophones, hand signals will give you the coded (and correct, but unexpected) word to hear. Eyes open.

Pay attention to when Potus Uses homophone words
aye eye i
awe, oar, or, ore
metal, mettle
rose  flower, rose awake
lie down lie, to people
http://www.singularis.ltd.uk/bifroest/misc/homophones-list.html

It is dif variations of possible code. 'code check'
For example, if POTUS post at 4:45 then take a look at what Anons have been working on around that 'marker'.
4:45 > :45
4:45 - 1 hr = 3:45 (compare to Anon post)
4:45 - 10 min = 4:35
4:45 review posts before 4:45 for any Notable posts.
2:38:12, 21817, 1+2 = 3, 2+1 = 3, 38 38 17 etc.
Goes as deep or as shallow as you take it.
---
anon SPECIFICALLY cited a 10 minute delta
[10] Delta
>>21903 POTUS twat: The Democrats Scam goes on and on! They Do Nothing!
Uhhh, anons that is what this anon calls a proof

If this is the code, thinking within it is tricky.
I notice POTUS can do it on the fly.
Where as if i attempt, takes concentration.
Especially when much time between deltas.
Sometimes forget my own deltas markers, kek.
Also, tricky when sending Qs and As.
1 way comms easiest.
Return comms doesn't have to be in same format/platform, kek.

################
'Where is the Whistleblower, and why did he or she write such a fictitious and incorrect account of my phone call with the Ukrainian President? Why did the IG allow this to happen? Who is the so-called Informant (Schiff?) who was so inaccurate? A giant Scam!'
>Okay, which are the improperly cap'd letters?

I see:
>W
>I
>S

////////////////////////////////////////////////

I see this all as common interpretation -- typing together improper capitalized entities.

(W)histleblower
Ukranian (P)resident
- - - Ukranian is inherited because they together describe a single entity, linked with President.
- - - Technically, this could be considered proper capitalization. The ambiguity in this means Gematria is not applicable, and one should use interpretation.
(I)nformant
(S)cam


Now, relate to other capitalized, since we are interpreting and not germatria

Where Whistleblower (with) Ukranian President [we already know no whistleblower was legitimately on the call.]
Why, IG?
Who (is the informant)? Schiff?
(Schiff is) A Scam!

This is how I read it.
Maybe this is the right way to read it, maybe not...
Any anons have thoughts on my decode?