Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Sep 23rd, 2017
429
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 7.12 KB | None | 0 0
  1. %Date: Tue, 15 Nov 88 15:44:08 EST
  2. %From: stan <stan@csi2.UofO.EDU>
  3. %Message-Id: <8811152044.AA23067@csih.UofO.EDU>
  4. %To: aha@ICS.UCI.EDU
  5. %
  6. %1. Title: Final settlements in labor negotitions in Canadian industry
  7. %
  8. %2. Source Information
  9. % -- Creators: Collective Barganing Review, montly publication,
  10. % Labour Canada, Industrial Relations Information Service,
  11. % Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0J2, Canada, (819) 997-3117
  12. % The data includes all collective agreements reached
  13. % in the business and personal services sector for locals
  14. % with at least 500 members (teachers, nurses, university
  15. % staff, police, etc) in Canada in 87 and first quarter of 88.
  16. % -- Donor: Stan Matwin, Computer Science Dept, University of Ottawa,
  17. % 34 Somerset East, K1N 9B4, (stan@uotcsi2.bitnet)
  18. % -- Date: November 1988
  19. %
  20. %3. Past Usage:
  21. % -- testing concept learning software, in particular
  22. % an experimental method to learn two-tiered concept descriptions.
  23. % The data was used to learn the description of an acceptable
  24. % and unacceptable contract.
  25. % The unacceptable contracts were either obtained by interviewing
  26. % experts, or by inventing near misses.
  27. % Examples of use are described in:
  28. % Bergadano, F., Matwin, S., Michalski, R.,
  29. % Zhang, J., Measuring Quality of Concept Descriptions,
  30. % Procs. of the 3rd European Working Sessions on Learning,
  31. % Glasgow, October 1988.
  32. % Bergadano, F., Matwin, S., Michalski, R., Zhang, J.,
  33. % Representing and Acquiring Imprecise and Context-dependent
  34. % Concepts in Knowledge-based Systems, Procs. of ISMIS'88,
  35. % North Holland, 1988.
  36. %4. Relevant Information:
  37. % -- data was used to test 2tier approach with learning
  38. %from positive and negative examples
  39. %
  40. %5. Number of Instances: 57
  41. %
  42. %6. Number of Attributes: 16
  43. %
  44. %7. Attribute Information:
  45. % 1. dur: duration of agreement
  46. % [1..7]
  47. % 2 wage1.wage : wage increase in first year of contract
  48. % [2.0 .. 7.0]
  49. % 3 wage2.wage : wage increase in second year of contract
  50. % [2.0 .. 7.0]
  51. % 4 wage3.wage : wage increase in third year of contract
  52. % [2.0 .. 7.0]
  53. % 5 cola : cost of living allowance
  54. % [none, tcf, tc]
  55. % 6 hours.hrs : number of working hours during week
  56. % [35 .. 40]
  57. % 7 pension : employer contributions to pension plan
  58. % [none, ret_allw, empl_contr]
  59. % 8 stby_pay : standby pay
  60. % [2 .. 25]
  61. % 9 shift_diff : shift differencial : supplement for work on II and III shift
  62. % [1 .. 25]
  63. % 10 educ_allw.boolean : education allowance
  64. % [yes no]
  65. % 11 holidays : number of statutory holidays
  66. % [9 .. 15]
  67. % 12 vacation : number of paid vacation days
  68. % [ba, avg, gnr]
  69. % 13 lngtrm_disabil.boolean :
  70. % employer's help during employee longterm disabil
  71. % ity [yes , no]
  72. % 14 dntl_ins : employers contribution towards the dental plan
  73. % [none, half, full]
  74. % 15 bereavement.boolean : employer's financial contribution towards the
  75. % covering the costs of bereavement
  76. % [yes , no]
  77. % 16 empl_hplan : employer's contribution towards the health plan
  78. % [none, half, full]
  79. %
  80. %8. Missing Attribute Values: None
  81. %
  82. %9. Class Distribution:
  83. %
  84. %10. Exceptions from format instructions: no commas between attribute values.
  85. %
  86. %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  87.  
  88.  
  89. @relation labor-neg-nominal
  90.  
  91. % Classes
  92. % -------
  93.  
  94. % good, bad.
  95.  
  96. % Attributes
  97. % ----------
  98.  
  99. @attribute duration { 1, 2, 3 }
  100. @attribute "wage increase first year" { low, medium, high }
  101. @attribute "wage increase second year" { low, medium, high }
  102. @attribute "wage increase third year" { low, medium, high }
  103. @attribute "cost of living adjustment"{ none, tcf, tc }
  104. @attribute "working hours" { sub35, sub40, equal40 }
  105. @attribute pension { none, ret_allw, empl_contr }
  106. @attribute "standby pay" { 2, 4, 8, 12, 13 }
  107. @attribute "shift differential" { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6, 10, 11, 25 }
  108. @attribute "education allowance" {yes, no }
  109. @attribute "statutory holidays" { 9, 10, 11, 12,13,15 }
  110. @attribute vacation { "below average", average, generous }
  111. @attribute "longterm disability assistance" { yes, no }
  112. @attribute "contribution to dental plan" { none, half, full }
  113. @attribute "bereavement assistance" { yes, no }
  114. @attribute "contribution to health plan" { none, half, full }
  115. @attribute class { good, bad }
  116.  
  117. @data
  118.  
  119. 1,medium,?,?,?,equal40,?,?,2,?,11,average,?,?,yes,?,good
  120. 2,medium,medium,?,?,sub40,ret_allw,?,?,yes,11,"below average",?,full,?,full,good
  121. ?,?,?,?,?,sub40,empl_contr,?,5,?,11,generous,yes,half,yes,half,good
  122. 3,medium,medium,medium,tc,?,?,?,?,yes,?,?,?,?,yes,?,good
  123. 3,medium,,medium,medium,?, equal40,?,?,?,?,12,average,?,half,yes,half,good
  124. 2,low,low,?,?,sub35,?,?,6,yes,12,average,?,?,?,?,good
  125. 3,medium,medium,medium,tc,?,empl_contr,?,?,?,12,generous,yes,none,yes,half,good
  126. 3,high,medium,low,?,equal40,?,?,3,?,12,"below average",?,?,?,?,good
  127. 2,low,high,?,?,sub40,?,12,25,yes,11,"below average",yes,half,yes,?,good
  128. 1,medium,?,?,none,equal40,empl_contr,?,4,?,11,generous,yes,full,?,?,good
  129. 3,medium,medium,medium,none,sub40,?,?,3,?,13,generous,?,?,yes,full,good
  130. 2,high,high,?,?,sub40,?,?,4,?,15,?,?,full,?,?,good
  131. 2,medium,medium,?,none,equal40,?,?,2,no,10,"below average",no,half,?,half,bad
  132. 3,medium,medium,medium,tcf,sub40,?,?,4,?,13,generous,?,full,yes,full,good
  133. 1,low,?,?,none,sub40,?,?,10,no,11,generous,?,?,?,?,good
  134. 2,medium,medium,?,none,sub40,empl_contr,?,?,?,11,average,?,full,yes,?,good
  135. 1,low,?,?,?,sub35,?,?,2,?,12,"below average",?,?,?,?,good
  136. 1,low,?,?,tc,equal40,ret_allw,2,3,no,9,"below average",yes,half,?,none,bad
  137. 1,low,?,?,none,sub40,none,?,?,yes,11,average,no,none,no,none,bad
  138. 2,medium,medium,?,tcf,sub35,?,13,5,?,15,generous,?,?,?,?,good
  139. 2,medium,medium,?,?,sub40,?,?,4,?,12,generous,?,full,?,full,good
  140. 2,low,low,?,?,equal40,none,?,?,?,11,"below average",?,?,?,?,bad
  141. 3,medium,medium,medium,tcf,sub35,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,good
  142. 2,medium,medium,?,?,equal40,?,?,4,?,10,generous,?,half,?,full,good
  143. 1,high,?,?,?,sub40,?,8,3,?,9,generous,?,?,?,?,good
  144. 3,low,low,low,none,equal40,none,?,?,?,10,"below average",?,half,yes,full,bad
  145. 2,medium,medium,?,tcf,?,?,?,?,yes,10,"below average",yes,none,?,half,good
  146. 2,low,low,?,none,sub35,?,?,?,yes,12,generous,?,?,yes,full,good
  147. 2,medium,medium,?,none,sub40,?,?,5,no,11,"below average",yes,full,yes,full,good
  148. 3,low,low,?,?,sub35,none,?,?,?,10,average,?,?,yes,full,bad
  149. 3,medium,medium,medium,none,equal40,?,?,?,no,11,average,?,half,?,?,good
  150. 3,low,low,low,tc,equal40,none,?,5,no,10,"below average",yes,half,yes,full,bad
  151. 2,low,low,?,?,sub40,empl_contr,?,?,?,10,average,?,?,?,?,bad
  152. 2,medium,medium,?,none,equal40,none,?,3,no,10,"below average",no,none,?,none,bad
  153. 3,low,low,low,tc,equal40,none,2,1,no,10,"below average",no,half,yes,full,bad
  154. 2,low,low,?,none,equal40,none,?,?,no,11,average,yes,none,yes,full,bad
  155. 1,low,?,?,tc,equal40,ret_allw,4,0,no,11,generous,no,none,no,none,bad
  156. 1,low,?,?,none,sub40,empl_contr,2,3,no,9,"below average",yes,half,?,none,bad
  157. 3,low,low,low,?,sub40,empl_contr,?,?,?,10,average,?,?,yes,none,bad
  158. 2,medium,medium,?,none,equal40,?,?,4,?,12,average,yes,full,yes,half,good
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement