Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
May 22nd, 2018
125
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 9.65 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  2. You seem more of a leftie so
  3. CNN I guess is ok?
  4. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/04/17/politics/trump-abe-meeting-north-korea-trade/index.html
  5. CNN
  6. Trump says 5 locations are being considered for Kim Jong Un meeting
  7. President Donald Trump told reporters on Tuesday that five locations are being considered for his widely anticipated meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
  8.  
  9. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  10. No.
  11. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  12. Or is this fake news
  13. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  14. I prefer the APSR
  15. which is numerically based and open to challenges from other professionals in the field
  16. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  17. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/04/09/donald-trump-north-korea-meeting-delay/499329002/
  18. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  19. Sorry, news sources like USA Today and CNN, literally are not even scratching the surface about what I'm taking about
  20. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  21. You are misunderstanding me if you think that he is full effect of this
  22. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  23. I don't misunderstand
  24. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  25. ok good
  26. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  27. I'm saying he has had an almost 0 affect
  28. You're saying he had some
  29. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  30. I don't believe that
  31. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  32. I disagree
  33. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  34. yes
  35. why
  36. there has been systematic (and stupid) communication with NK and SK with DT/potus
  37. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  38. Trump currently is so weak on the global stage that nothing he does or says can be taken seriously. Only through the random chance that he might actually FUCK you up, is he somewhat effective at policy.
  39. Oh I agree
  40. And it's NK taking advantage of such a stupid man and no Real US foreign policy anymore
  41. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  42. why you are sayin ghe is weak
  43. because m5m says he is seen as a joke or
  44. just curious
  45. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  46. When it's on the whims of one man who rolls out of bed every morning and changes his mind is NOT a way to lead global policy
  47. Trump IS a joke. An unfunny one.
  48. Germany is leading the free world now-- hahahahah its funny to even say that.
  49. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  50. i find him an amusing joke
  51. one president doesnt change leadership of the world
  52. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  53. Believe me, living here and having to experience his policies of bleached sand is not as funny
  54. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  55. germany is not leading hte free world atm
  56. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  57. You are surely mistaken
  58. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  59. or our terms of free world are conflicted
  60. germany is more in bed with russia now
  61. because of nodstream
  62. nordstream
  63. than with free world
  64. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  65. Oh I'm sure.
  66. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  67. or are you saying russia is part of the free world
  68. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  69. Oil and gas prices will do that to a country reliant on them
  70. Hahah FUCK no
  71. But let me say this, Europe isn't looking to the US to lead
  72. And Germany is filling up the vacuum
  73. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  74. france and UK used USA with syria situation
  75. and that is the biggest part of "free world world politics" of 2018
  76. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  77. Anything different about this and the Iraq war?
  78. Nope
  79. Just different geopolitical location
  80. Same fight over pipelines
  81. Same bullshit about a terrorist state
  82. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  83. yeah, but that still needs leadership?
  84. or what are you talking about when you mean free world leadership being under germany
  85. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  86. There you go
  87. One could argue it's also France trying to lead with Macron
  88. But eh...
  89. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  90. that would be a bs argument but yes could
  91. i am still (as a FULLY OBJECTIVE NON-OPINIONATED PERSON) thinking DT/potus had an effect on the progress
  92. it makes me a bit sad, because i wanted to see him fail
  93. but o well
  94. i understand how you feel about this
  95. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  96. I don't really care if he fails
  97. But like his presidency
  98. I feel like this is a trap
  99. Why is NK scrambling if they have nukes?
  100. China must have wanted to abandon them if Trump decided to really fight them on it.
  101. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  102. naturally
  103. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  104. Nvm the trade "deals" going on now
  105. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  106. but china has counted chips together why to abandon them
  107. if so
  108. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  109. I mean-- they are already in a trade war with us
  110. A real war would cripple the Chinese economy
  111. As well as a flood of immigrants coming into their country
  112. It strategically was nothing that trump did, it's the culmination of 50 years of merciless US and SK policy
  113. ISOLATIONISM WORKS
  114. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  115. oh yeah just happened to happen on trump's mid term
  116. i dont believe in chance
  117. specially when trump has been this active regarding nk
  118. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  119. Trump active on NK?
  120. Boi you trolling
  121. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  122. i dont troll regarding this
  123. yes he was active
  124. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  125. He's about as active on NK as he is on civil rights
  126. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  127. what the heck
  128. you live in a bubble
  129. :smile:
  130. have to
  131. even i seen million things regarding him and koreas
  132. in the past year
  133. and i live in finland
  134. but this is going exactly how i assumed it would
  135. most would deny 100% anything trump did regarding this
  136. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  137. Sorry dude, that's not how I see it-- reversing 50 years of policy on whims and publicly flipping on your State department is not a strategy nor is it something that would have an affect on negotiations
  138. Because this is a SK lead effort
  139. Not US
  140. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  141. even if SK lead it
  142. US is always prat when it comes to koeras
  143. koreas
  144. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  145. US has done nothing but saber rattle
  146. What real change has there been in policy other than trump agreeing to a meeting?
  147. 0
  148. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  149. saber rattling is a lot
  150. you do know this
  151. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  152. Not with NK
  153. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  154. actually i think its most that yo ucould do
  155. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  156. doing that for 50 years
  157. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  158. i am not saying htis was done by DT
  159. but osmebody in their administration knew what to do regarding this
  160. and did
  161. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  162. I'm saying the most erratic of saber rattling was some by DT
  163. sorry, but with how many people are moving in and out of this administration, in high profile positions, i.e.: Rex tillerson, there is hardly much the US could have done in terms of policy
  164. Literally this is SK realizing, "holy shit this might actually boil into a himanitarian catastrophe, better take the lead here"
  165. Because there IS no leadership
  166. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  167. there is actaully no
  168. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  169. Leadership has to be done with consistency
  170. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  171. proof regarding that anywher
  172. that i can find at the moment
  173. that i am trying to find
  174. so it has to be your own assumptions based on feeling or what
  175. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  176. Excuse me?
  177. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  178. all sources claim that usa has been with sk/nk talks
  179. i am trying to google :smile:
  180. information where sk dumped usa in this
  181. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  182. take a broader perspective and stop looking at the internet for your answers here.
  183. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  184. what is your broader perspective?
  185. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  186. What would I know about US foreign politics and shit
  187. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  188. i need sources, not feelings
  189. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  190. I only worked for the government
  191. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  192. exactly
  193. a lot less than thousand sources online
  194. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  195. And I only have a degree in politics
  196. And only specialized in Asia/ us relations
  197. But go on
  198. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  199. you know that matters little in an argument
  200. arguments need proof
  201. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  202. Tell me more about my countries policy
  203. :3
  204. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  205. any kind of proof
  206. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  207. I'm not going to source you tons of PSR papers
  208. You won't even read them
  209. Too dense, too much econometrics
  210. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  211. i will
  212. i dont mind reading
  213. link me anything that proves that and ill consider it an option
  214. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  215. Proves?
  216. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  217. prooves
  218. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  219. I'm not going to waste my time
  220. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  221. im not english
  222. what
  223. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  224. Seriously
  225. I'm not going to waste my time. I have a class to teach now
  226. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  227. so the argument is
  228. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  229. See ya
  230. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  231. 1) believe rem cos he has a degree and worked for goverment (i dont even know as what)
  232. 2) online information is fraud
  233. 3) wikipedia is fraud
  234. 4) see ya
  235. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  236. Actually, the reason is I really don't have the time
  237. You want me to prove things
  238. But you reference Cnn
  239. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  240. i found 10 different sources
  241. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  242. As if you can play a double standard and that's fine. Which is it? CNN is fake news or it's not.
  243. Wikipedia is not good for sources
  244. Sorry, you're not convincing me otherwise
  245. Enough.
  246. Don't care.
  247. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  248. that is why i asked you to tell me what you accept as a source
  249. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  250. I told you.
  251. Peer reviewed PSR papers with numbers and data.
  252. Something I can look at numbers on.
  253. lol. I've had enough trolling for a morning. Time for work.
  254. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  255. i am not trolling :))
  256. im astonished how stubborn you are, but sure, ill try to find psr paper with numbers and data!
  257. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  258. Good luck with that dude.
  259. Half of those papers are tied up behind a paywall
  260. But sure, go ahead
  261. :3
  262. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  263. so you are saying only proof you can get to convince you that DT had anything to do with SK/NK peace is behind paid services
  264. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  265. I'm telling you, that half of these papers are behind a paywall
  266. Not my fault it is
  267. Not my fault you likely can't access it
  268. Anttu - 27.04.2018
  269. you can?
  270. TheOneTornApart - 27.04.2018
  271. Yeah, I could, but I'm not going to.
  272. I'm not doing your legwork.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement